The European Court of Human Rights this week ruled that two men whose DNA and fingerprints were held by police but who had not been convicted of any crime, should have their records expunged.

This could have huge implications for the UK’s central DNA database which currently holds records for all those arrested regardless of whether they are charged or convicted. You can read the story in full on the BBC News website -
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7764069.THIS IS NEARLY THE SAME AS MY CASE WITH THE POLICE NOW ENDED AS AN INVESTIGATION BY POLICE,SINCE 2002 IVE BEEN SUBJECT TO HARRASSMENT/INTIMIDATION/DISCRIMINATION BY POLICE IN CLEVELAND, MY NUMBER IS 07846610325, AS IT REFERS TO THE ABUSE OF DNA IN MY CASE ITS DATA ABUSE BUT WITH THE SAME IMPLICATIONS,i did have 2 miner convictions in 1996 under crb disclosure rules police are allowed to hold for 5 years on record,in 2002 these are supposed to be removed,so in 2002 im supposed to have a clean crb disclosure to do my job as a bus driver,a crb is important to my job as it relies on safe transportation of school kids and the vulnerable,as a driver im open to the public for allegations,scruiteny,allegations were made and i stood with the consequences,i was found not guilty on all 10 accounts, in 42 years with 1 conviction of abusive language,wich i pleaded guilty too,for the last six years without conviction my data in the crb disclosure contains all allegations,ive been unemployed for 6 years,ive had problems getting hospital treatment,seeing a doctor,moving house to find work,getting police help,getting solicitors to deal with the problems i faced,there is no complaints proceedures for data abuse by police,considering damien green,he knows this well,clevelands polices answer is to loose the data covering up the facts,loose the complaints,covering up the facts,loose the evidence to cover up the facts,interferance with the course of justice is what i see,just like the house of lords timely investigations to forget the facts, instead of the quick/appropriate way of dealing with the problems,police are forgetting themselves in the facts they represent the laws,and that they are not the law personally,its not rights that when ipcc investigates a complaint they are allowed to dispence with a case becuase police apply to ipcc to dispence with a case,to many people cannot lie about a matter and this happens when police get things wrong,any how dna kept by government offices on non convicts is illegal but the damage to a persons lifetime employment is worsened when false and innacurate data is given out to the public for a person who has no convictions should be seen as an abuse of data,courts should decide the outcome of a case like that to consider compensation to a crime by police,trusted servants,transparent is not whats happening to me,im paying for 6 years crimes i did not commit but instead of allowing my crb to be cleaned for the future ive got to a stage wher i had to fight the powers that be to assist me get me help,the thing that gets to me and it would you is that we have a mayor in middlesbrough who has more on his crb disclosure than any criminal in cleveland,400 allegations were made in the operation lancett /robo copt/the bent cop, who took his collegues through the mud with him14 of those allegations were admitted by him to get out of there quick,so he could start his new career as mayor,i complained to the council and asked why he got the job a spokesman told me that he has no convictions because he pleaded to the offences he was released,and he cannot be in debt,or have worked for the council,but as a cleveland police cheif surely he worked for the council as a police officer in the same area,he became nmayor,the police in cleveland suffered the brunt of his morals 740 complaints were made about the police under him,the 6 million pound police station had a death a mans body was found in a cell dead of course at the patrolled station,and nnone saw anything unusual about it