トムAllard

警備機関は秘密に彼らの携帯電話で人々を追跡でき、新しい法律の下で令状を得ないで3かまで月間のために拾い読みする彼らのインターネットを監視するために上院の前にこの週行きなさい。

力は比較的マイナーな犯罪調査の範囲、公正ではないテロリズムの場合で使用できる。

それらは呼出しがなされたか、またはウェブサイトが訪問されるちょうど数分後ASIOおよび中央政府および州の警察が- 「準リアルタイム」それらにことを電話会社およびインターネットサービスプロバイダーの流れ情報の要求するようにする。 情報は国家か中央政府警察が複雑ならASIOの調査の90日まで、および45日の間提供されなければならない。

Justified as a counter-terrorism measure, the legislation has already been passed by government and Labor members of the lower house. But it remains deeply unpopular with legal experts and privacy advocates.

As well as not requiring a warrant signed by a judicial officer, the powers could be used in any criminal investigation into a suspected offence that carries a jail term of three years or more.

The regime applies to all “telecommunications data”, including the time and destination of phone calls made and received, the duration of the calls and the location of the callers.

For computers, security agencies would be told what website addresses and chat rooms the user has visited and what files have been downloaded. The laws would also enable authorities to track internet conversations.

Security agencies would still need a judicial warrant to listen in on phone calls, or peruse emails.

The Greens senator Kerry Nettle said the powers would allow authorities to glean huge amounts of information. Every mobile phone could potentially become a tracking device for police and ASIO.

The bill “is more like something from East Germany than a party claiming to support liberal principles”, she said. “There is no judicial oversight. Police and ASIO should have to get a warrant to track and tap people’s mobile phones or web browsing.”

The Attorney-General, Philip Ruddock, was unavailable for comment yesterday. He has previously said the laws do not constitute new powers for security agencies, but a “more systematic and appropriate controls over the existing access framework”.

But the legislation’s own explanatory memorandum says the regime for “prospective” telecommunications data - the streaming of near real-time information for up to 90 days - is new.

The Law Council of Australia argues that technological advances mean the powers pose new dangers to privacy. Tracking someone with a mobile phone was far easier than secretly affixing a listening device without breaking and entering, it said. Therefore the proposed powers were “far more amenable to misuse or over-use by law enforcement agencies”.

Comment on 'Spy laws track mobile phones' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News: