Прогрессивно
Activism средств
Нагрузка…
| Регистр | Lost пароль? | Информационый бюллетень
Пароль будет переслан к вам. Logon | Lost пароль?
Email будет послан к вам. Logon | Регистр
Переведите:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Инструменты: Новости | Комментарий столба | Вариант принтера | Email к другу

Пятница 11-ое октябрь 2007

Парламентский барбос убеженный о отдельно e-пасспортах и удостоверениях личности

Делите эту статью:

Эти иконы соединяют к социальным bookmarking местам где читатели могут делить и открывать новые страницы стержня.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Antony Savvas

парламентский комитет счет государственной организации (Pac) хвалит дорогу e-пасспорты сверните вне, но говорит правительство имеет некоторую работу, котор нужно сделать для того чтобы убедить публику о потребности для отдельно удостоверений личности в результате.Pac говорит информация, котор держат на e-пасспортах подобна к информации, котор содержат в предложенных удостоверениях личности, и планы правительства для отдельно удостоверения личности могут быть unwarranted.

Edward Leigh MP, chairman of the Pac, said, “The introduction of the first generation of e-passports was an excellent example of successful project management and procurement by the Identity and Passport Service.

“The introduction from 2009 of second generation e-passports, digitally storing holders’ fingerprints as well as their photographs, will present an even more demanding implementation challenge.”

The Pac is also concerned about the reliability of the chip in the passports. Leigh said, “The best manufacturer’s warranty that the Identity and Passport Service could get for the electronic chip embedded in the passport was for only two years, even though passports are valid for ten years.

“The public will want to be told just how durable the chip is and, if it stops working, who will pay for a replacement. The prospect of e-passport failures contributing to yet further delays at border controls is not an enticing one.”

Leigh says, “Most of us are going to have to have both an e-passport and an identity card. The Home Office needs to explain why an e-passport could not serve both purposes. At the very least, the Identity and Passport Service should reduce areas of overlap as the identity card project progresses and make sure that the combined fee for the two documents is minimised.”

A Pac report examines how lessons learnt from the introduction of e-passports will be incorporated into future projects, the cost of authenticating applicants’ identities, passport fee trends, the measures being taken by the Identity and Passport Service to hold down passport fees, and working with others to reduce costs and improve border security.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Parliamentary watchdog not convinced about separate e-passports and ID cards' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Cost of ID cards blasted by MPs
  • IPS leak suggests ID card fingerprint chop
  • Government Technologies Reduce National Security
  • Home Office reveals first projects for ID Scheme
  • ID card SCAM ‘to cost £5.6bn’‏

  • This entry was posted on Thursday, October 11th, 2007 at 2:08 pm and is filed under Surveillance . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com

    Breaking News