Progressiv
Mittel-Aktivismus
Laden…
| Register | Verlorenes Kennwort? | Rundschreiben
Ein Kennwort wird zu Ihnen verschickt. LOGON | Verlorenes Kennwort?
Ein email wird Ihnen geschickt. LOGON | Register
Übersetzen Sie:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Werkzeuge: Nachrichten | Pfosten-Anmerkung | Drucker-Version | Email zum Freund

Donnerstag, den 11. Oktober 2007

Parlamentarische überwachung überzeugt nicht über unterschiedliche Epässe und Identifikation Karten

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel:

Diese Ikonen verbinden mit bookmarkenden Sozialaufstellungsorten, in denen Leser neue Webseiten teilen und entdecken können.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Antony Savvas

parlamentarische öffentlichkeit erklärt Ausschuß (Pac) hat die Weise gepriesen Epässe sind heraus gerollt worden, aber sagen, daß die Regierung etwas Arbeit hat, zum zu tun, um die öffentlichkeit über die Notwendigkeit an den unterschiedlichen Identifikation Karten infolgedessen zu überzeugen.Das Pac sagt, daß die Informationen, die auf Epässen gehalten werden, den Informationen ähnlich sind, die in den vorgeschlagenen Identifikation Karten enthalten werden und die Pläne der Regierung für eine unterschiedliche Identifikation Karte unbefugt sein können.

Edward Leigh Wartungstafel, der Vorsitzende des Pac, gesagt, „die Einleitung des ersten Erzeugung der Epässe war ein ausgezeichnetes Beispiel des erfolgreichen Projektmanagements und -beschaffung durch Identität und Pass-Service.

“The introduction from 2009 of second generation e-passports, digitally storing holders’ fingerprints as well as their photographs, will present an even more demanding implementation challenge.”

The Pac is also concerned about the reliability of the chip in the passports. Leigh said, “The best manufacturer’s warranty that the Identity and Passport Service could get for the electronic chip embedded in the passport was for only two years, even though passports are valid for ten years.

“The public will want to be told just how durable the chip is and, if it stops working, who will pay for a replacement. The prospect of e-passport failures contributing to yet further delays at border controls is not an enticing one.”

Leigh says, “Most of us are going to have to have both an e-passport and an identity card. The Home Office needs to explain why an e-passport could not serve both purposes. At the very least, the Identity and Passport Service should reduce areas of overlap as the identity card project progresses and make sure that the combined fee for the two documents is minimised.”

A Pac report examines how lessons learnt from the introduction of e-passports will be incorporated into future projects, the cost of authenticating applicants’ identities, passport fee trends, the measures being taken by the Identity and Passport Service to hold down passport fees, and working with others to reduce costs and improve border security.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Parliamentary watchdog not convinced about separate e-passports and ID cards' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Cost of ID cards blasted by MPs
  • IPS leak suggests ID card fingerprint chop
  • Government Technologies Reduce National Security
  • Home Office reveals first projects for ID Scheme
  • ID card SCAM ‘to cost £5.6bn’‏

  • This entry was posted on Thursday, October 11th, 2007 at 2:08 pm and is filed under Surveillance . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    Fair use notice

    This website contains some copyrighted material that has not been specifically authorised by the copy right owner. RINF is making such material available in our efforts to advance public understanding of poverty alleviation, political economy, popular democracy and social justice issues both in Scotland and overseas. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material provided under US Copyright Law.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 621 Users Online Right Now

    Breaking News