|
|
翻譯：
             
擁有照相機不做您一名罪犯
星期二， 2009年4月21日
當喬治・布什在旅遊業發音了反恐怖戰爭作為「戰爭」，我們認為它是，因為他是蠢貨。 可能沒有，因為看起來旅遊業和恐怖主義是同一件事-或至少，他們是對一些警察。 怎麼能我們解釋拍攝汽車站的照片遊人的騷擾？ 哀傷地， Klaus Matzka的經驗绝不是異常的。 所有种的攝影師，從非職業攫奪者到讚成，發現照相機受到各種各樣專制的關注。 攫取警察在一平安的演示，并且您可能找到自己被刻痕在反恐怖主義行動的第76部分之下2008年; 短冷期別的和您能找到自己被指責恐怖主義和被命令刪除您的相片。 一部分的問題是過分熱忱的人在制服，他們是否是治安警衛或服務警察。 大城市警察的發狂的反恐怖主義注意(PDF)，烙記攝影師，因為潛在的轟炸機不確切地幫助。 但也有一個問題以法律。 想法反恐怖主義行動牌子的拍攝警察的第76部分非法是純淨的幻想。 它根本不提及相片。 相反，它認為收集或出版可能是「是有用」對狂怒轟炸機、外國間諜或者本・拉登關於警察或武力的信息是非法的。 行動的誤解 與幾乎一切在與恐怖主義連接的世界那些日子-冰島銀行』財產凍結了根據反恐怖主義立法，而反恐怖主義監視力量也用於制裁這樣威脅到生活和自由像狗胡扯和飛行卸車-然後看是容易的怎麼那個詞組可以是由事故或故意地誤譯。 這例子。 會攻擊以後死於內部出血是有用對恐怖分子的一個無辜的平民的警察的英尺長度？ 一位警察的英尺長度怎麼樣在重擊婦女的身體裝甲，他的ID徽章掩蓋，因此沒人能報告他？ 當然他們會。 這樣英尺長度的循環破壞對警察的人的尊敬，做我們奇蹟，如果有些是正義惡棍與徽章，并且艱苦做工作好警察-誰是，當然，多數人-。 他們是為交戰的精采補充工具，也是。 That doesn’t make the photographs or video clips illegal, though. If you’re hanging around military bases with a zoom lens, then of course you’re going to get nicked - but irrespective of what uniformed goons might tell you, it’s legal to take photos of pretty much anything else provided you’re not breaking any other laws in the process. Deleting photos Forcing you to delete your snaps, on the other hand, is not legal - because if you’re committing a crime, then your photos are evidence. Think about that for a second. If someone orders you to delete your shots, they’re saying: “I have caught you committing a crime and I am ordering you to delete all the evidence.” Security guards don’t have the powers to search you, and they can’t legally delete your photos. The police can’t delete your photos, either, unless they get a court order. If you’re hanging around RAF airfields with a zoom lens or you’re on privately owned property then there are laws stopping you from taking pictures - but in most circumstances there’s no reason why you can’t photograph whatever you want. Don’t believe us? Ask the government. Here’s Shahid Malik, Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for the Home Department, on 1 April 2009: “Police officers have the discretion to ask people not to take photographs for public safety or security reasons, but the taking of photographs in a public place is not subject to any rule or statute. There are no legal restrictions on photography in a public place, and there is no presumption of privacy for individuals in a public place.” As Malik told Parliament: “Our counter-terrorism laws are not designed or intended to stop people taking photographs. That is simply not their aim. People have the right to take photographs in public places for legitimate reasons and we will do everything we can to uphold that right.” Mr Malik says that police forces around the land are being issued new guidance telling them just that. Here’s hoping they actually read it. Copyright 2006 - 2009 Future Publishing Limited Have Your Say: Owning a camera doesn’t make you a criminal Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
podcasts about money, the economy, etc Last post by paul w @ 03:05 AM
Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
British MP expenses scandal podcast Last post by paul w @ 02:03 AM Planet X/Niburu Last post by paul w @ 01:44 AM Australia: Man Sees Ball Shaped Object With Strange Markings Last post by paul w @ 01:42 AM ExxonSecrets.org: How Exxon funds Global Warming Denial Last post by TwistBeats @ 01:34 AM VIDEO: The New American Century Last post by Regina @ 12:05 AM Is Jesus a Myth? Last post by Nostalgia @ 09:59 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive
|
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
10 Things You Might Not Know About ID Cards Lost Military Disks Had Personal Information |
Hassan commented on: Anonymous - Why we fight Scientology You should look into other blogging platforms, wordpress is getting slower and slower these days, I... Continue Reading & Reply Victor commented on: 10 Things You Might Not Know About ID Cards The ID card scam is just like Microsoft software, it looks good at first appraisal, but has so... Continue Reading & Reply Technology Impacts commented on: Lost Military Disks Had Personal Information via Lost Military Disks Had Personal Information. Continue Reading & Reply Adam %9 commented on: SEO Internet Marketing Skyrockets I dont normally post comments to blogs but I have to say this is a great post and a big thanks for this... Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
