![]() |
|
|
NY police cleared in 50-bullet wedding day shooting
Saturday, April 26th, 2008
A New York state judge cleared two police officers of manslaughter and other charges and a third of reckless endangerment in the death of Sean Bell, 23. Bell was shot, along with two friends, after a bachelor party at a strip club in November 2006. But federal authorities said they would consider civil rights charges in the case in a review to be conducted by the Justice Department, federal prosecutors and the FBI. They will “take appropriate action if the evidence indicates a prosecutable violation of federal criminal civil rights statutes,” the Justice Department said in a statement. After the verdict, hundreds of demonstrators yelled angrily, and there was pushing and shoving in the crowd as police, reporters and spectators packed the sidewalk. Civil rights leader Al Sharpton, who has been highly critical of police and is influential in New York’s black community, called for wider protests. “They want us to act crazy so they would have an excuse to do more,” Sharpton told the audience of his radio show. “We are going to be strategic. We are going to close the city down in a nonviolent effective way.” Mayor Michael Bloomberg called for calm after the verdict, saying, “We don’t expect violence or law-breaking, nor is there any place for it.” The case had generated outrage in New York’s black community, though police said they did not expect violence because numerous demonstrations against the perceived police brutality had remained peaceful. “It shows that there is no justice in America for the black man. This is telling us the cops can do whatever they want and get away with it,” said B.M. Marcus, a community organizer. APOLOGY The acquitted officers gave brief statements thanking their friends and family. “I’d like to say sorry to the Bell family for the tragedy,” said detective Marc Cooper, who had been charged only with reckless endangerment. The other two detectives, Gescard Isnora and Mike Oliver, were charged with manslaughter. All three defendants waived their right to a jury trial and decided to have the judge decide guilt or innocence. The defense lawyers said jurors in the borough of Queens were likely to be biased against the policemen due to the intense media coverage generated by the case. State Supreme Court Judge Arthur Cooperman said the charges could not be proved beyond a reasonable doubt, noting that some prosecution witnesses contradicted themselves from prior statements and may have had motivation to lie. “At times the testimony just didn’t make sense,” Cooperman said. After the verdict, loud sobs were heard in the courtroom. The judge gave credibility to the detectives’ statements that they believed they were in danger but also offered, “Questions of carelessness and incompetence must be left to other forums.” The eight-week trial centered on whether the detectives had reason to believe they faced imminent danger and whether they made it clear to Bell and the two survivors that they were police officers. On the night of the shooting, Isnora, the undercover officer who fired first, followed Bell and his two friends to Bell’s car believing they went to fetch a gun to settle a dispute at the club. He opened fire after being grazed by Bell’s car as Bell attempted to drive away. The other officers reached Bell’s car after the initial confrontation and said they believed Isnora was being fired at from inside the vehicle. (Reporting by Edith Honan; Editing by Jackie Frank) Have Your Say: NY police cleared in 50-bullet wedding day shooting Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. One Response to “NY police cleared in 50-bullet wedding day shooting”
Related News
|
you tube pulling a lot of conspiracy vids. Last post by Nostalgia @ 10:55 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Bush's 11th-Hour Bid for Secrecy Last post by Unregistered @ 10:06 AM Drug Companies Ordered to Pay Alabama $114 Million in Medicaid Pricing Fraud Scheme Last post by Unregistered @ 10:04 AM Climate Activists Invade Washington DC Offices of Environmental Defense Last post by Unregistered @ 09:59 AM Prophetic Signs that we are in the End Times Last post by ArthurBorges @ 05:57 AM Zombie Palin Last post by ArthurBorges @ 05:51 AM Your Monday Message from the Libertarian Party: Last post by ZingPao @ 04:16 AM Just A Comment... Last post by ZingPao @ 03:57 AM GM Covered With Giant Tarp Until It Has Money To Work On Cars Again Last post by ZingPao @ 03:45 AM God Help Him, But Area Man Loves That Crazy Bitch Last post by ZingPao @ 03:41 AM Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More World News Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
There is no excuse for any police officer firing on anyone that is unarmed , while there are other so-called non-lethal means of officers protecting themselves such as tasers ect , yes they themselves carry risks but i would suggest that they may not be so dangerous too life as a hail of bullets ! . It does not supprise me that they waived their right too be tried by jury as obviousely a jury would have seen the inconsistancies in the various statemants and there would have been a more likely result of the officers being found guilty . It amazes me how they always look after their own , when will someone finaly be held accountable ? . I also agree that NON-VIOLENT protests are indeed wise as any violence would give vindication to the police that they were in the right in their actions ! .