<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: NY police cleared in 50-bullet wedding day shooting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/ny-police-cleared-in-50-bullet-wedding-day-shooting/3174/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/ny-police-cleared-in-50-bullet-wedding-day-shooting/3174/</link>
	<description>Breaking News, Alternative News &#038; Media</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 06:08:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: steve k</title>
		<link>http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/ny-police-cleared-in-50-bullet-wedding-day-shooting/3174/#comment-35852</link>
		<dc:creator>steve k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://rinf.com/alt-news/surveillance-big-brother/ny-police-cleared-in-50-bullet-wedding-day-shooting/3174/#comment-35852</guid>
		<description>There is no excuse for any police officer firing on anyone that is unarmed , while there are other so-called non-lethal means of officers protecting themselves such as tasers ect , yes they themselves carry risks but i would suggest that they may not be so dangerous too life as a hail of bullets ! . It does not supprise me that they waived their right too be tried by jury as obviousely a jury would have seen the inconsistancies in the various statemants and there would have been a more likely result of the officers being found guilty . It amazes me how they always look after their own , when will someone finaly be held accountable ? . I also agree that NON-VIOLENT protests are indeed wise as any violence would give vindication to the police that they were in the right in their actions ! .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is no excuse for any police officer firing on anyone that is unarmed , while there are other so-called non-lethal means of officers protecting themselves such as tasers ect , yes they themselves carry risks but i would suggest that they may not be so dangerous too life as a hail of bullets ! . It does not supprise me that they waived their right too be tried by jury as obviousely a jury would have seen the inconsistancies in the various statemants and there would have been a more likely result of the officers being found guilty . It amazes me how they always look after their own , when will someone finaly be held accountable ? . I also agree that NON-VIOLENT protests are indeed wise as any violence would give vindication to the police that they were in the right in their actions ! .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
