London ANPR mass surveillance snooping倫敦anpr大規模監視窺探
Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008 週二， 2008年4月22日
By通過 SpyBlog spyblog |
Just in case you thought that Spy Blog has not tried the available, alleged “checks and balances” which are supposed to prevent the disproportionate abuse of our privacy and freedoms, you might be interested in our brief correspondence with the只是在情況下，您認為間諜博客並沒有試圖可用，所謂“制衡” ，這是假定，以防止過度濫用我們的隱私和自由，您可能有興趣在我們的簡短書信與 Office of the Surveillance Commissioners辦公室監察專員 , regarding the function creep of what were supposed to have been “save the environment” schemes: the London Congestion Charge and the London Low Emission Zone, but which have now mutated into a secretive, unaccountable, mass surveillance snooping scheme. ，關於函數蠕變是什麼假定已“拯救環境”計劃：在倫敦擁擠費和倫敦低排放區，但現在已經突變成為一個秘密，不負責任的，大規模監視竊聽計劃。
Rt.逆轉錄。 Hon.提問。 Sir Christopher Rose克里斯托弗梅耶爾上升
Chief Surveillance Commissioner行政監察專員
Office of Surveillance Commissioners辦公室監察專員
PO Box 29105,郵政信箱29105 ，
London, SW1V 1ZUCopy via email: oscmailbox@osc.gsi.gov.uk倫敦， sw1v 1zucopy通過電子郵件： oscmailbox@osc.gsi.gov.uk20th September 2007 2007年9月20日
Dear Sir Christopher,親愛的先生克里斯托弗，
I am writing to you in respect of the current Automatic Number Plate Recognition mass surveillance scheme, which was announced by Home Office Minister Tony McNulty on 17th July 2007, involving “real time” “bulk data transfers” between the London Congestion Charge system run by Transport for London and the Metropolitan Police Service.我寫信給你，在尊重目前的自動車牌識別質量監控計劃，這是所公佈的家庭辦公室部長托尼mcnulty對2007年7月17日，涉及的“實時” “批量數據傳輸”之間的倫敦交通擠塞收費系統的運行由運輸和倫敦大都會警察局服務。
” The Minister of State, Home Department (Mr. Tony McNulty) : I would like to inform the House that my right hon. “ 國務大臣，民政署 （ 先生托尼mcnulty ） ：我想告訴房子，我的權利的提問。 Friend the Home Secretary has signed a certificate to exempt Transport for London (TfL) and the Metropolitan Police Service (MPS) from certain provisions of the Data Protection Act 1998 to facilitate the bulk transfer of Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) data from TfL to the MPS.朋友民政司已簽署了證明書，以豁免運輸倫敦（ tfl ）和首都警察服務（總薪級表）由若干條文對1998年數據保護法，以方便批量轉讓自動車牌識別（ anpr ）的數據，以tfl強制性公積金計劃。 The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police believes that it is necessary due to the enduring, vehicle-borne terrorist threat to London.專員大都會警察局認為有必要，由於長期，車輛傳染的恐怖威脅到倫敦。 The MPS requires bulk ANPR data from TfL’s camera network in London specifically for terrorism intelligence purposes and to prevent and investigate such offences.強制性公積金計劃需要大量的數據anpr從tfl的相機網絡在倫敦專門為反恐情報的宗旨和防止和調查這類罪行。 The infrastructure will allow the realtime flow of data between TfL and the MPS.As one of the conditions of this certificate, the MPS will provide an annual report to the Information Commissioner so that he can satisfy himself that the personal data processed under the certificate is required for the purposes of safeguarding national security, and that any processing that is undertaken other than under an exemption set out in the certificate is carried out in compliance with the Data Protection Act 1998.基礎設施將允許實時數據流之間的tfl和mps.as的條件之一此證書，強制性公積金計劃將提供一個年度報告的信息專員，使他能夠滿足自己的個人數據處理下，該證書是所需的目的，維護國家安全，而任何處理即是承諾以外的其他下，豁免內容已載列於該證書是進行了在遵守1998年數據保護法。
My right hon.我的權利的提問。 Friend the Home Secretary will review the operation of the certificate in three months time when the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police provides her with a separate, interim report so that she can be personally satisfied that the certificate is being operated in accordance with the agreement and that the privacy of individuals is protected.朋友民政司會的運作情況進行檢討，該證書在3個月的時候，專員大都會警察局提供了她與一個單獨的，臨時報告，以便她可以親自感到滿意，該證書是經營根據該協定，並個人隱私是受到保護的。 In the coming months, proposals will be developed and discussed across Government to ensure that bulk ANPR data-sharing with the police is subject to a robust regulatory regime which ensures reasonable transparency and scrutiny.”在未來的幾個月中，建議將制定和討論了全國政府，以確保散裝anpr數據共享與警方是受強勁的規管制度，確保合理的透明度和審議“ 。
This is obviously far more than a simple Data Protection Act section 29 Notice request for details about a particular suspect vehicle.這顯然是遠遠多於一個簡單的數據保護法第29條通知的要求，詳細了解某一特定嫌疑人的車輛。 The use of Ministerial Certificates must mean Mass Surveillance, presumably on a 24/7 basis, outside of the normal Congestion Charge enforcement period ie also at night, at weekends and on public holidays, to cover what would otherwise be “excessive data processing” for a purpose other than which the data was originally collected, without explicit personal consent, thereby flouting the fundamental Principles of Data Protection.使用部長級會議的證書必須是指大規模的監視，想必對24 / 7的基礎上，以外的正常擁擠費的執法期間，也即在夜間，週末及公眾假期，以涵蓋什麼，否則， “過多的數據處理”一目的以外的其他目的，其中的數據本來是收集，沒有明確的個人同意，從而藐視的基本原則，數據保護。
I note that there is no mention in the Ministerial Statement of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, which surely must also apply to this Mass Surveillance project, especially in the light of your comments on Automatic Number Plate Recognition in your first Annual Report,我注意到有沒有提及，在部長聲明，該規例的調查權力法案2000年，這當然也必須適用這項大規模的監察項目，尤其是在根據您的意見就自動車牌識別在您的第一份年度報告，
“11.3 Improvements in technology continue to enhance the capability of those charged with the responsibility of tackling crime. “ 3月11日在技術方面的改進，繼續提高的能力，這些被控的責任，解決犯罪問題。 But, as indicated in last year’s report, the speed of change often surpasses the limitations of current legislation.但是，正如表示，在去年的報告中，轉變的速度，往往超過了限制，目前的立法。 With regard to Automatic Number Plate Recognition, my position is the same as that of my predecessor and I adhere to the view that legislation is necessary to resolve some issues arising from enhanced technological capability.”關於自動車牌識別，我的立場是一樣，即我的前任，我堅持認為，立法是要解決的一些問題所引起的增強技術能力“ 。
Were any of the Surveillance Commissioners consulted about this project before it was announced ?任何的監察委員徵詢對這個項目之前，據宣布？
Have you given your permission for this Mass Surveillance scheme to go ahead, which must catch vast numbers of innocent people and vehicle movements, contrary to the principle of narrowly targeted, proportionate, lawful surveillance under RIPA ?你有你的許可，這個大規模的監察計劃，以繼續進行，必須急起直追，大量無辜的人及車輛的運動，相反的原則，狹義的有針對性的，相稱的，合法的監視下， ripa ？
Yours Sincerely,此致，[name] [姓名]
[address] [地址]
The short reply was frustrating and depressing - we are obviously “little people”, whose concerns and worries, are simply ignored by the bureaucracy and the politicians:短期的答复是令人沮喪的和令人沮喪的 -顯然，我們的“小人們” ，他們的關注和憂慮，根本忽略了官僚和政客：
Office of Surveillance Commissioners[name] [address]辦事處監察專員[姓名] [地址]
1 October 2007 2007年10月1日
Dear [name]親愛的[姓名]
Thank you for your letter of 20 September about the Automatic Number Plate Recognition mass surveillance scheme.感謝您的信9月20日關於自動車牌識別質量監控計劃。
The Chief Surveillance Commissioner has seen your letter and asked me to reply on his behalf.行政監察專員已經看到你在信中問我要答复代表他發言。 He notes your interest in these matters but does not think it appropriate to answer your questions.他注意到，您有興趣在這些事情上，但並不認為是適當的回答您的問題。
I am sorry I cannot be more helpful.我很抱歉我不能更有幫助。
Yours sincerely此致
[name of secretary] [名稱司]
Secretary to the Office of the Surveillance Commissioners局長辦公室監察專員Office of the Surveillance Commissioners辦公室監察專員
PO Box 29105郵政信箱29105
London, SW1V 1ZU倫敦， sw1v 1zu
Telephone: 020 7828 3421電話： 〇二〇七八二八三四二一
Facsimile: 020 7952 1788傳真：零二零七九五二一七八八
Web: www.surveillancecommissioners.gov.uk網址： www.surveillancecommissioners.gov.uk
email: oscmailbox@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk電子郵件： oscmailbox@homeoffice.gsi.gov.uk
How is this supposed to represent adequate or proper “independent scrutiny” of the vast powers, and function creep of secret state surveillance snooping, which is increasingly and wastefully being directed at millions of innocent people , rather than being targeted proportionately and narrowly at actual terrorist suspects or serious organised criminals ?如何這是假定代表足夠或適當的“獨立審查”廣大的權力，職能和蠕變國家秘密監視竊聽，這是越來越多和浪費正針對數百萬無辜人民 ，而不是有針對性的和狹義的比例在實際恐怖嫌疑人或者嚴重有組織的罪犯？
Is it any wonder that people are frustrated by, and resentful of, the people and systems which purport to “protect” the public, whilst maintaining their freedoms and liberties, but which do not do so in practice ?是它，難怪人們感到沮喪，不滿，人民和系統的旨趣，以“保護”公眾，同時維持他們的自由，但不這樣做，在實踐中呢？
See More: 看到更多的： Big Brother 大哥哥 UK News 英國新聞Have Your Say: London ANPR mass surveillance snooping 你說：倫敦anpr大規模監視窺探
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。
This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 22nd, 2008at 8:51 amand is filed under 此項目被張貼於週二， 4月22日， 2008at 8時51 amand是提交下 Surveillance, Civil Liberties & Human Rights News 監視，公民自由及人權新聞 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。
Free Newsletter 免費通訊 
Related News 相關新聞
- UK TV Documentary about surveillance and privacy needs YOU!英國電視紀錄片約監視及隱私需要你！
- US and UK rank poorly as global privacy is being eroded美國和英國的排名不佳，作為全球的隱私是受到侵蝕
- Academic: CCTV Leads To inequality In Legal Cases學術：中央電視台，導致不平等的法律案件
- Report: Surveillance a Threat to Fundamental Rights報告：監視威脅的基本權利
- VIDEO: History Channel Surveillance Tech視頻：歷史頻道監測技術
Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
- Teachers threaten more strikes教師威脅罷工
- FBI: We Warned About Torture of Detainees聯邦調查局：我們警告，被拘留者施加酷刑
- US ‘war on terror’ backfiring, says thinktank美國的'反恐戰爭'回火說， thinktank
- White House Influence Is Cited in Corruption Trial白宮的影響力是引用的貪污審判
- Promotion an ominous sign of possible war with Iran推廣是一個不祥的徵兆的可能發生的戰爭與伊朗
- Question For RINF Users: Do You Want a Forum?問題rinf用戶：你是否希望有一個論壇？
- Students Skip Class For Obama Event, Get Suspended學生跳過班奧巴馬活動，得到暫停
- Olympic protest movement turns its sights on to sponsors奧運抗議運動輪流其著眼於以提案國
- Gitmo Torture Orders Came From The Top關塔那摩酷刑的訂單來自頂端
- Feds to require visitors’ fingerprints when they leave US聯邦調查局要求旅客的指紋，當他們離開美國
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞
Archive 存檔