![]() |
|
|
In de Krachtmeting van de Rechtszaal, de Amnestie van de Eisen van Bush voor het Spioneren Telecommunicatie
Woensdag, 3 December, 2008
In the telecom immunity challenge, the government argues that the telecoms should not be punished, or suffer the threat of punishment, for a surveillance program that the Bush administration claims was designed only to fight terrorism. The government also denies the lawsuits’ allegations that the surveillance was a broad dragnet that sucked down Americans’ communications on a wholesale basis. The administration also says the immunity is warranted because the lawsuits threaten to expose government secrets. The EFF brought the original spying lawsuit in 2006 against AT&T, and has since been joined by dozens of others targeting the nation’s telecommunications companies. The EFF’s case, which has been consolidated with the others in the U.S. District Court of San Francisco, includes so-called whistle-blower documents from a former AT&T technician. The EFF claims the documents describe a secret room in an AT&T building in San Francisco that is wired to share raw internet traffic with the NSA. The government sought to dismiss the original EFF case, and others that followed, on the grounds that they threatened to expose state secrets. Judge Walker has ruled against the government, saying the case could proceed. The government appealed. But before the appeal was decided, Congress on July 9 gave the president the power to grant immunity to the carriers. The EFF is now challenging the immunity legislation on the grounds that it seeks to circumvent the Constitution’s separation of powers clause, as well as Americans’ Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable searches and seizures. “The legislation is an attempt to give the president the authority to terminate claims that the president has violated the people’s Fourth Amendment rights,” the EFF’s Cohn says. “You can’t do that.” Two weeks ago, the administration told Walker in a court filing (.pdf) that the immunity legislation “represents the considered judgment of our nation’s political branches that, in the unique historical circumstances following the 9/11 attacks, telecommunications companies should not bear the burden of defending against claims that those companies assisted the government in its efforts to detect and prevent further terrorist attacks.” Congress, the government continued, “concluded that those companies should not face further litigation if they provided such assistance pursuant to a court order or a written certification, directive or request from a senior government official, or did not provide the alleged assistance.” The immunity law allows the government to file a classified brief with Judge Walker activating immunity for a particular communication company. Walker then has little power to deny the request, unless the judge finds the immunity legislation is itself unconstitutional. Oral arguments in Walker’s courtroom are scheduled for 10 a.m. PST on Tuesday. Threat Level will cover the proceedings live. Have Your Say: In Courtroom Showdown, Bush Demands Amnesty for Spying Telecoms Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Icke. Conspiracy & Anti-Semitism Last post by Unregistered @ 10:40 PM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Barack Obama 1961 birth announcement from Honolulu Advertiser Last post by Unregistered @ 10:29 PM HEY HUMAN! - YES you! - You do not have to be livestock - SO WAKE UP! Last post by StuartG @ 10:22 PM Live comments as kid kills himself on live webcam Last post by loki @ 08:55 PM US Special Forces counterinsurgency manual leaked Last post by loki @ 08:49 PM Prophetic Signs that we are in the End Times Last post by Unregistered @ 06:55 PM Marxism is GREEN! Part 1 Last post by Unregistered @ 06:33 PM 9/11 Truther Suspended From Bristol Green Party Last post by Unregistered @ 06:05 PM Washington exploits Mumbai attack to promote "war on terror" Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 05:39 PM The Big Brother state - by stealth Last post by Unregistered @ 04:53 PM Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More World News Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |