Feds to Collect Millions of DNA Profiles Yearly联邦调查局收集以百万计的DNA纹印每年
By通过 Ryan Singel瑞安singel | The feds will soon be collecting about one million DNA samples a year under a new program that lets federal agents collect cheek swabs from citizens merely arrested for any federal crime or from any non-citizen detained by federal agents — including visitors to the country who have visas. |联邦调查局将很快收集约一百万的DNA样本，每年根据新的程式，让联邦特工收集的脸颊样本只是从公民被捕的任何联邦的犯罪所得或从任何非公民被拘留被美国联邦特工-包括游客到该国谁有签证。
The intent is build a其意图是建立一个 massive database of DNA samples海量数据库的DNA样本 (.pdf) that police can use to catch rapists and murderers, but even the innocent should fear being in the database, due to the vagaries of how cold case DNA searches can easily pinpoint an innocent person. （ PDF格式）表示，警方可以使用赶上强奸犯和杀人犯，但即使是无辜的，应该害怕被在数据库中，由于难以预测的情况下有多冷， DNA的搜索可以很容易针对一个无辜的人。
Thanks to an amendment in the Violence Against Women Act of 2005 that was sponsored by Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Arizona), the feds now have the authority to immediately take DNA from any arrestee or ‘detained’ non-citizen and immediately upload it to the FBI’s CODIS database. That database is currently fed by federal law enforcement agencies and all 50 states, a few of which collect and upload感谢的一项修正案，在对妇女的暴力行为， 2005年是由参议员琼kyl （的R -亚利桑那州） ，联邦调查局现在有权力立即采取DNA的任何被逮捕或'扣留'非公民，并立即将它上传向联邦调查局的codis数据库。数据库是目前美联储联邦执法机构和所有50个州，数，其中收集和上传 DNA samples from people arrested DNA样本从人被捕 , but not convicted of a crime. ，但没有被定罪的犯罪行为。
DNA profiles are composed of 13 genetic markers that are meant not to reveal genetic makeup or disease. DNA纹印组成的13个遗传标记是指没有透露化妆或遗传疾病。 Like fingerprints, DNA are very powerful and scientifically sound evidence, when used to connect a known suspect to evidence found at the scene of the crime.像指纹， DNA的是非常强大和可靠科学的证据时，用来连接一个已知的嫌疑人的证据，发现在犯罪现场。 Jurors are easily persuaded to accept the DNA link for someone who had already been suspected of a crime scene when told the odds against a false identification are 1 in millions or billions.陪审员很容易说服接受DNA的连结，有人谁，已涉嫌犯罪现场时告诉赔率对虚假鉴定是一，在数百万或数十亿。
But DNA is far less certain when you compare one sample against all of the profiles in the database typically known as one-to-many.但DNA是远不及某些当您比较一个样本对所有的配置文件在数据库中通常称为一到很多。 In that case the chances that a match between a DNA sample — especially an incomplete one — and a person in a DNA database could nab an innocent person has different math.在这种情况下的机会，比赛之间的DNA样本-特别是一个不完整的一-和一个人在一个DN A资料库，可新借贷安排一个无辜的人有不同的数学。 Very different math.非常不同的数学。
So if you have a probability of 1 in 1.1 million chance of people having a certain sequence of DNA markers and you have a database of 550,000 people, you have a 50% chance of making a match.因此，如果你有一个概率为1的110.0万人的机会，有一定的序列的DNA标记和您有一个数据库， 55.0万人，你有50 ％的机会，使比赛。 That’s great, if you know that the perpetrator is in that database.说的伟大，如果您知道肇事者是在该数据库中。 But what it also means is that as you start testing DNA profiles against more and more people, the chances that you will match an innocent person to a DNA profile from a crime scene gets higher.但它也就是正如你开始测试DNA纹印反对的人越来越多，机会，你将匹配一个无辜的人的DNA的个人资料，从犯罪现场获得较高的。
A recent LA Times story about a cold case prosecution of a 1972 rape and murder in California, where 30 years later, police matched a DNA sample from the scene to that of a convicted rapist in its 338,000 profile strong DNA database.最近洛杉矶时报的故事，一冷案起诉1 1972年强奸和谋杀在加利福尼亚州，那里30年后，警方匹配的DNA样本从现场说，一个被定罪的强奸犯在其338000的个人资料强烈DNA资料库。 Given the number of markers that were used there was a one in three chance that some profile in the database would match.由于人数标记被用于有一个在三个机会，一些个人资料在数据库中会匹配。 In this case, it matched John Puckett, who lived in the same city.在这种情况下，匹配的约翰puckett ，谁住在同一城市。
The jury however, wasn’t told about the probability that someone in the database would match against the profile (The LA Times story erroneously says that there was a 1/3 chance that someone innocent would be fingered in such a search. If one knew for a fact that every person in the database were innocent, then there was a 1 in 3 chance that an innocent person would get fingered, but in Puckett’s case, one simply knows that there was a one in three chance someone in the California criminal database would be fingered.)陪审团然而，没有告诉有关的概率，有人在该数据库的比赛中的配置文件（洛杉矶时报的故事，错误地说，有一个1 / 3的机会，有人无辜的，将指在这样一个搜索，如果人知道。为一个事实，每个人都在数据库中是无辜的，然后有一个一在三的机会，一个无辜的人会得到指，但在puckett的情况下，一只是知道有一个在三个机会，有人在美国加州刑事数据库将指） 。
And that’sa problem when the government starts collecting millions of DNA samples, sticking them in a massive database and finding ‘cold hits.’和that'sa的问题，当政府开始收集以百万计的DNA样本，他们坚持在一个庞大的数据库，并寻找'冷战安打。
Imagine the innocent man facing down a jury of his peers, hoping that they understand something about statistics.试想，无辜的人所面临的一个陪审团，他的同行，希望他们了解一些有关的统计数字。
The Justice Department is taking司法部正在采取 comments on the proposed DNA rules评论就拟议的DNA规则 until Monday, May 19.直到星期一， 5月19日。
See More: 看到更多的： USA News 美国新闻Have Your Say: Feds to Collect Millions of DNA Profiles Yearly 你说：联邦调查局收集以百万计的DNA纹印每年
Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的我们的新论坛
This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 14th, 2008 at 3:40 pm and is filed under 此项目被张贴在周三， 2008年5月14日在下午3时40分，并提交下 Surveillance, Civil Liberties & Human Rights News 监视，公民自由及人权新闻 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反应，此项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 喂养。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回应 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 从你自己的网站。
Free Newsletter 免费通讯 
Related News 相关新闻
- A DNA recipe for injustice一个DNA食谱不公正
- ‘POLICE SHOULD TAKE DNA OF ALL BABIES’ '警方应采取DNA的所有婴儿
- DNA database threatens civil rights in health care DNA资料库的威胁公民权利，在健康护理
- Police must not store DNA details of the innocent - report警方绝不能存储的DNA的细节无辜-报告
- 5,000 children a month added to DNA database 5000儿童每月增加DNA资料库
Email This Page To A Friend 电子邮件此页给朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新闻标题
- CIA death squads killing with “impunity” in Afghanistan美国中央情报局行刑队杀害与“有罪不罚的现象”在阿富汗
- Why should we pay the Orwellian licence fee?我们为什么要支付奥威尔的牌照费？
- Firms await verdict on £2 billion ID cards project公司正等待判决英镑， 20.0亿的身份证项目
- I was tortured to confess, Pervez tells appeal court我是折磨招供，佩尔韦兹告诉上诉法庭
- Iran busts CIA terror network伊朗胸围中央情报局的恐怖网络
- Propaganda and the media宣传和新闻媒体
- Cluster Bomb Ban Opposed by US, China, Russia集束炸弹，禁止反对由美国，中国，俄罗斯
- Is the Creative Internet Just About Dead?是创造性的互联网仅仅是死？
- Hybrid embryos ’should be banned’混合胚胎'应被禁止'
- ‘Challenging Authority’ '富有挑战性的权威'
More更多 Breaking News突发新闻
Archive 存档
