![]() |
|
فيديراليّة قاضية قواعد 2 وطنية عمل إحتياطات غير دستوريّ
يوم الجمعة, سبتمبر - أيلول [28ث], 2007
[ستروك] [فدرل كورت] في يوم الأربعاء نزولا إلى اثنان إحتياطات من الوطنية عمل يعالج مع بحوت وذكاء تجميع, مثل هم ينتهكون الرابعة تعديل حماية ضدّ غيرمعقول بحوت وقبض [ويث رغرد تو] مقاضيات إجراميّة.
يقول [برندون] [مفيلد], يترك, وعامّة مدافعة ستيفن شمع من الصرف من الحالة ضدّ [مفيلد] في 2004. "هو حرجة أنّ كتب نحن, كأمة ديموقراطيّة, راتب إنتباه قريبة إلى تقليديّة رابعة تعديل مبادئ," قاضية [أنّ] [أيكن] من الولايات المتّحدة الأمريكيّة محكمة جهويّة للمنطقة [أرغن] في ه 44 صفحة قرار. "قد خدم التعديل رابعة هذا أمة جيّدا ل 220 سنون, من خلال كثير أخرى أخطار." الاستخبارات أجنبيّة مراقبات ثبت محكمة المراجعات, حتّى مراجعات تنصّت على خطّ هاتف تطبيقات في ذكاء حالات تحت الاستخبارات أجنبيّة مراقبات عمل, أو [فيسا], "يمسك أنّ الدستور يحتاج لا يضبط التصرّف إداريّ من مراقبات إجراميّة في الولايات المتّحدة الأمريكيّة," [أيكن] كتب. "[إين بلس وف] التعديل رابعة, توقّعت الالناس أن يؤجّل إلى ال [إإكسكتيف برنش] وتمثيله أنّ هو سيفوّض هذا مراقبات فقط عندما مناسبة." يسأل الحكومة "هذا محكمة إلى, جوهريّا, يعدّل ال [بيلّ وف ريغت], ب يعطي هو تفسير أنّ حرم هو من أيّ معنى حقيقيّة. المحكمة قال انحدارات أن يتمّ هكذا," [أيكن]. العدل راجع قسم كان القرار, يقول ناطق بلسان عميد [بود]. كان ال يحكم إستجابة إلى قضية يصنّف ضدّ الحكومة فيديراليّة ب [برندون] [مفيلد], بورتلاند, [أرغن], وكيلة الذي كان خطأ أوقفت لتورط مزعومة في ال 2004 مدريد قافلة تموين قصفات. اعتذر الحكومة فيديراليّة فيما بعد إلى [مفيلد] وقرّر جزء من [مفيلد] قضية ل $2 مليون. غير أنّ سمحت [مفيلد] كان أن يحافظ يتتبّع الأجزاء من قضيته صعبة الدستوريّة من الوطنية عمل. [مفيلد] يدّعى في الدعوى أنّ ه كسرت منزل و [لو وفّيس] كان سرّا داخل ب ال [فبي], زبوناته' مبارد في مكتبه كان بحثت, ه عمل وحاسوب شخصي كان سرّا نسخت, هاتفه كان [ويرتبّد] ومنزله كان تنصّتت. [مفيلد] قال كان هو "يثير وسعيدة" مع ال يحكم. "ليس هذا, إلى ي, كثيرا شخصيّة," هو قال. "يفكّر أنا هو صحيحة ال يصحّ شيء أن يتمّ. It was the right thing to continue to challenge the constitutionality of the Patriot Act.” “This is an example of the judicial branch doing what it should do, and that’s to be a check and balance for the legislative and executive branch of government,” he said. “I feel wonderful today, because the Fourth Amendment has been restored to its rightful place, and the balance between liberty and security is balanced again.” Mayfield’s attorneys — Gerry Spence, Elden Rosenthal and Michelle Longer Eder — lauded the ruling. “Judge Aiken, in striking down the challenged provisions of the Patriot Act, has upheld both the tradition of judicial independence and our nation’s most cherished principle of the right to be secure in one’s own home,” they said in a written statement. “We are relieved that the Bill of Rights can be honored and preserved even in times of perceived crisis.” Aiken ruled that FISA, as amended by the Patriot Act, permits the government to conduct surveillance and searches targeting Americans without satisfying the probable-cause standard in the Fourth Amendment. “Prior to the amendments [to FISA], the three branches of government operated with thoughtful and deliberate checks and balances — a principle upon which our nation was founded,” Aiken wrote. But the Patriot Act, she said, eliminated “the constitutionally required interplay between executive action, judicial decision and Congressional enactment.” “For over 200 years, this nation has adhered to the rule of law — with unparalleled success. A shift to a nation based on extra-constitutional authority is prohibited, as well as ill-advised,” she wrote. Aiken noted that FISA does not require that the subject of a search be notified, although the Fourth Amendment ordinarily does. In addition, she said, the Fourth Amendment requires particularity — authorities seeking a search warrant, for example, must list what they are looking for and where they are looking for it. Named to the bench in 1997 by President Clinton, Aiken is considered one of the more liberal judges on the federal bench in Oregon. http://edition.cnn.com/2007/US/law/09/26/patriot.act/index.html Have Your Say: Federal judge rules 2 Patriot Act provisions unconstitutional Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
ONE Minute, To See the Truth About Palestine- The Hidden Truth Last post by Victor @ 04:55 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Householders to be charged for each flush of toilet Last post by Unregistered @ 01:32 AM Saudi judge sentences pregnant gang-rape victim to 100 lashes for committing adultery Last post by Unregistered @ 01:32 AM Monkey Death Wish, hilarious Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:57 AM Brzezinski: U.S. Recession Could Lead to Riots Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:46 AM USA lured USSR into the trap of Afghanistan war Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:34 AM Kissinger's recovery plan: NWO or 'chaos' Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:23 AM Hunt for Allen Stanford and his billions Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:57 PM Largest collection of ice age fossils found beneath Los Angeles store Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:53 PM Met suspends nine police officers in corruption inquiry Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:49 PM Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive
|
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
UK Home Secretary Jacqui Smith, on drugs Iran Next Target, Warns Israeli Diplomat The Banality of Corporate Evil Facebook now owns your content - forever Amy Goodman: Obama?s Afghan Trap Scottish Ministers 'completely opposed' to ID cards |
Chris Morton commented on: Guantanamo: How many children were held? How many of these children were tortured? How many children are currently held by the US and... Continue Reading & Reply Sarah commented on: 16 US troops commit suicide in Iraq They killed themselves because they KNOW they did the wrong thing. You kill eventually you will also be... Continue Reading & Reply caged_negro commented on: Iran Next Target, Warns Israeli Diplomat actually every nation on the planet contains a mixed bag. Just as politicians poorly represent... Continue Reading & Reply Johnny G commented on: Facebook now owns your content - forever CONFIRMED. It’s been reverted to old terms and services. Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |