The proposed framework represents an attempt to address privacy concerns that have dogged past counterterrorist data mining programs like Total Information Awareness.拟议的框架，是企图以解决隐私问题已困扰过去反恐数据挖掘程序，共计信息意识。

The report acknowledges the utility of a variety of technologies in the context of security, but cautions that counterterrorism programs need to be operated lawfully, with oversight, and with some recognition of the limits of technology.报告承认的效用了各种技术方面的安全，但警告说，反恐计划需要合法经营，监督，和一些认识的局限性的技术。

Automated terrorist identification, the report says, “is neither feasible as an objective nor desirable as a goal of technology development efforts.”自动恐怖查明，该报告说， “既不可行，作为一种客观可取的，也不作为一个目标，技术发展的努力。 ”

“To address [the threat of terrorism], new technologies have been created and are creating dramatic new ways to observe and identify people, keep track of their location, and perhaps even deduce things about their thoughts and behaviors,” the report says. “为了解决[恐怖主义的威胁] ，新技术已经建立和正在创造巨大的新方法来观察和鉴定人，记录他们的位置，甚至推断出事情的思想和行为， ”该报告说。 “The task for policy makers now is to determine who should have access to these new data and capabilities and for what purposes they should be used. “任务为决策者现在是决定谁应该获得这些新的数据和能力，并为何种目的，他们应该使用。 These new technologies, coupled with the unprecedented nature of the threat, are likely to bring great pressure to apply these technologies and measures, some of which might intrude on the fundamental rights of US citizens.”这些新技术，再加上空前的性质的威胁，有可能带来巨大的压力，适用这些技术和措施，其中一些可能侵入的基本权利的美国公民。 “

Privacy is one such fundamental right, and the report finds that current government policy doesn’t respect that right sufficiently.隐私就是这样的一个基本权利，该报告认为，目前政府的政策不尊重这一权利的充分。

“The current policy regime does not adequately address violations of privacy that arise from information-based programs using advanced analytical techniques, such as state-of-the-art data mining and record linkage,” the report states. “目前的政策制度并没有充分解决侵犯隐私而产生的信息为基础的计划利用先进的分析技术，如国家最先进的数据挖掘和记录的联系， ”报告指出。

Data mining techniques may have proven value in a commercial context, but the report warns that identifying terrorists this way is less reliable and prone to error.数据挖掘技术可以证明价值在商业方面，但报告警告说，恐怖分子确定这种方式是不可靠和容易出错。

“One might argue that the consequences of a false negative (a terrorist plan is not detected and many people die) are in some sense much larger than the consequences of a false positive (an innocent person loses privacy or is detained),” the report says. “人们可能认为的后果假阴性（恐怖分子的计划是没有发现，许多人死亡）在某种意义上远远大于后果的假阳性（是一个无辜的人失去隐私或扣留） ， ”报告说。 “For this reason, many decision makers assert that it is better to be safe than sorry. “出于这个原因，许多决策者断言，它是更好的安全比抱歉。 But this argument is fallacious.但这种论点是荒谬的。 There is no reason to expect that false negatives and false positives trade off against one another in a one-for-one manner.”我们没有理由期望，假否定和误报权衡对彼此在一对一的方式。 “

The report recommends that the government be particularly careful when using behavioral surveillance to predict dangerous intent.该报告建议，政府应特别小心，当使用行为监测预测危险的意图。 There’s no scientific consensus about whether such technology — brain scanning, for example — actually works, says the report.没有科学共识是否这种技术-脑扫描，例如-实际工作，报告说。

“[P]lacing people under suspicion because of their associations and intellectual explorations is a step toward abhorrent government behavior, such as guilt by association and thought crime,” the report says. “ [ P ]花边的人受到怀疑，因为他们协会和智力的探索是第一步可恶的政府行为，如内疚的结社和思想犯罪， ”报告说。 “This does not mean that government authorities should be categorically proscribed from examining indicators of intent under all circumstances — only that special precautions should be taken when such examination is deemed necessary.” “这并不意味着政府部门应坚决禁止从检查指标的意图在所有情况下-只有特别的预防措施时应采取这种检查是必要的。 ”

The report presents two major recommendations.报告提出了两个主要建议。 It argues that the US government should follow a framework, such as the one proposed in the report, to evaluate the effectiveness, lawfulness, and consistency with US values of every information-based program for counterterrorism.它认为，美国政府应当遵循一个框架，如报告中提出，评价的有效性，合法性，并符合美国价值观的每一个以信息为基础的反恐计划。 And it calls for a periodic review of laws and policies related to privacy in light of changing technologies and circumstances.并要求定期审查的法律和政策的有关隐私权根据不断变化的技术和情况。

The NRC plans to discuss its findings in a one-hour public briefing at 12:30 pm EDT today at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, DC A live audio Webcast should be available at the核管理委员会的计划，讨论其结果在一个小时的公开发布会上美国东部时间下午12:30今天在美国国家科学院在华盛顿特区的现场音频直播应可在 National Academies国家科学院 site.网站。