°íµî ¹ý¿øÀº ÀüÀÚ ¿ìÆí ±â¹ÐÀ» À§ÇØ Áö¹èÇÑ´Ù
¿¬¹æ Á¶»çÀÚ´Â ¾Ë·ÁÁö´Â Ãʺ» º¸Ãæ±³Àç ȸ»ç¿Í °ü·ÃÀÖ´Â »ç±â ¼ö»ç µ¿¾È¿¡ ¿µÀå ¾øÀÌ ±×°ÍÀÇ "¹Ì¼Ò ¹Ùºê" ads ÀÇ ¿ù¿äÀÏ Áö¹èµÈ ¿¬¹æ °íµî ¹ý¿øÀ» ÀüÀÚ ¿ìÆíÀ» ã¾Æ¼ üÁú»ó °æ°è¸¦ Áö³ªÃÆ´Ù.
¿©¼¸¹øÂ° ¹Ì±¹ÀÇ three-judge À§¿øÈ¸¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© Áö¹è. ¿¬¹æ ¼øÈ¸ Ç×¼Ò ¹ý¿øÀº ÀÓ½ÃÀûÀ¸·Î ¹öŬ¸® ÇÁ¸®¹Ì¾ö NutraceuticalsÀÇ Steven Warshak, ¼ÒÀ¯ÀÚ ¹× ´ëÅë·É¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© À̷п¡ ÀÖ´Â Ãß°¡ÀûÀÎ ÀüÀÚ ¿ìÆí ¼ö»ö¿¡¼ Á¶»çÀÚ¸¦ ¸·´Â ÇÏ±Þ ¹ý¿ø ÆÇ°áÀ» ÁöÁöÇÑ´Ù.
±×ÀÇ È¸»ç°¡ "ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀÎ ³²¼º ÁõÁø" Á¦Ç°À» ºÎ¸¥ Enzyte¸¦ Æ÷ÇÔÇÏ´Â º¸Ãæ±³À縦 ½ÃÀå¿¡ ³»³õ´Â Warshak´Â, ±×ÀÇ ÀüÀÚ ¿ìÆíÀÌ ±â·ÏÇÑ ÈÄ¿¡ Á¤ºÎ°¡ °¥ ¶§ ¹«¸®ÇÑ ¼ö»ö ¹× ³ªÆ÷¿¡ ´ëÇÏ¿© ±×ÀÇ Á¦ 4 °³Á¤ º¸È£°¡ À§¹ÝµÇ¾ú´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» À̶ó°í¿Í ÁÖÀåÇß´Ù.
¡°The district court correctly determined that e-mail users maintain a reasonable expectation of privacy in the content of their e-mails,¡± Judge Boyce Martin said in a case closely watched by civil-liberties advocates in the still-emerging field of Internet privacy.
Warshak has pleaded not guilty to charges that he and his business defrauded customers and banks out of at least $100 million in an alleged scheme that included billing credit cards without authorization.
USA News Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Appeals Court Rules for E-Mail Privacy' :
Related News:














¼±Àû¡¦













