Прогрессивно
Activism средств
Нагрузка…
| Регистр | Lost пароль? | Информационый бюллетень
Пароль будет переслан к вам. Logon | Lost пароль?
Email будет послан к вам. Logon | Регистр
Переведите:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Инструменты: Новости | Комментарий столба | Вариант принтера | Email к другу

Среда 12-ое июнь 2007

Академично: CCTV водит к неравноправности в законных случаях

Делите эту статью:

Эти иконы соединяют к социальным bookmarking местам где читатели могут делить и открывать новые страницы стержня.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Mick Meaney
Новости алтернативы RINF

Университет Cambridge академичный, Ross Anderson, профессор инженерства обеспеченностью на университете и стуле учредительства для исследования политики информации, сегодня предупреженный парламент неравноправностей произвели электронными данными, включая изображения CCTV.

A growing number of academics, police and politicians are becoming ever more concerned about the Big Brother state juggernaut that is quickly eroding our civil liberties, removing our personal freedoms and destroying our privacy, due to Tony Blair’s Labour government since the horrific events of 9/11.

Professor Anderson will give evidence to the Commons home affairs committee’s inquiry into the “surveillance society” and follows on from last week, when Nick Eland, legal services manager of Tesco, and Martin Briggs, corporate affairs director of LMG, the firm that created the privacy invading Nectar cards, also presented evidence to the committee.

Professor Anderson said: “Surveillance creates an inequality of arms in both civil and criminal cases. The police can easily get CCTV or ANPR [automatic number plate recognition] data to show you committed a crime, but you have great difficulty getting this data to establish an alibi.

“A bank can get CCTV data to prove you made a disputed ATM transaction, but you can’t get this data to prove that you didn’t.”

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Academic: CCTV Leads To inequality In Legal Cases' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Growing use of CCTV in classrooms
  • CCTV runs risk of data protection breach
  • 8 - 10 CCTV Cameras per Irish Bus
  • Watchdog says most UK CCTV cameras are illegal
  • Do we trust government on ID cards?

  • This entry was posted on Tuesday, June 12th, 2007 at 12:18 pm and is filed under Surveillance, Mick Meaney . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 642 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 681 Total Comments

    Breaking News