9 Responses to “Your Privacy for Sale: Internet Providers Cash In”九月的反应， “您的隐私作出售用途：互联网服务供应商的现金”

1. Jelv jelv Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 8:15 am | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在上午8时15分| Link to this 链接到本

   Phorm and BT were supposed to start running trials several weeks ago. phorm和BT被假定开始投放审判数星期前。 But they have run in to such a wall of opposition and legal problems that they have been postponed.但他们却运行在这样一个墙的反对和法律问题，他们已被推迟。 It begins to look a distinct possibility that conforming to the law may undermine the entire business model and so it may never happen.它开始寻找一个独特的可能性，符合法律，可能会破坏整个的业务模式和因此可能永远不会发生。 There is speculation that Virgin Media may be on the verge of announcing that it is pulling out altogether.有猜测认为，美属维尔京媒体可能对即将公布，这是完全退出。 Reply回复

2. Richard Head 理查德头 Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 8:36 am | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在上午8时36分| Link to this 链接到本

   This sytem is not live in the uk…yet.这个系统是不是住在英国… 。 Many people from MP’s, MEP’s, The Lords and thousands of people on many websites are fighting for your internet privacy on this matter.很多人从国会议员，军事的，上议院和成千上万的人在很多网站都在争取您的Internet隐私就这件事。 Come and join the fight.来参加这场斗争。 Google ‘phorm webwise’ and you’ll find us. Google的phorm webwise ' ，你会发现我们。 Reply回复

3. revrob revrob Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 9:31 am | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在上午09时31分| Link to this 链接到本

   I am a BT customer and I can categorically state that BT are NOT yet using this technology.我是一名英国电信的客户，但我可以明确地指出，英国电信尚未使用这种技术。 They have carried out secret illegal trials in 2006 and 2007, and they are planning to carry out further trials (much delayed and currently due to start prior to 26th May - about the third or fourth date they have announced) but there is NO evidence that any of the three ISP’s you name are currently using the despicable Webwise software designed by ex-spyware producers Phorm/121Media, the people responsible for PeopleonPage and also for rootkits.他们已进行了秘密非法审判在2006年和2007年，他们正计划进行进一步的审判（多延误及目前由于之前开始，到5月26日-关于第三或第四位的日期已宣布） ，但目前并没有证据显示任何三个ISP的名称，你目前正在使用的卑劣webwise而设计的软件，由前间谍软件生产商phorm/121media ，人民负责peopleonpage ，也为的rootkit 。 There are vigorous campaigns going on to prevent this technology being implemented and while your report is welcome, it needs to be accurate.有积极的运动，将来为了防止这种技术正在实施的同时，您的报告是值得欢迎的，它需要得到准确的。 For further information try here为进一步资料，尝试在这里 http://www.inphormationdesk.org/ and then follow the links.然后按照链接。 Reply回复

4. PA 坝 Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 1:57 pm | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在下午1时57分| Link to this 链接到本

   BT appear to be the only ISP who are so far down the line with this that they feel compelled to push on regardless. Bt基因似乎是唯一的ISP谁是迄今下来，符合这个他们认为强制推动，不论。 However, even they may have hit a brick wall.不过，即使他们可能击中砖墙。 Read the post by BTInsider on the BadPhorm forum:阅读帖子由btinsider就badphorm论坛： http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?5226.0#post_5235 http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?5226.0 ＃ post_5235 Reply回复

5. Mick Meaney 米克meaney Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 2:16 pm | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在下午2时16分| Link to this 链接到本

   It has been reported that Phorm IS in use, see:据报道， phorm正在使用中，看到： http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/29/phorm_documents/ http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2008/mar/06/internet.privacy http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/04/07/phorms-all-seeing-parasite-cookie/ http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/29/phorm_roundup/ Reply回复

6. Mark 马克 Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 2:18 pm | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在下午2时18分| Link to this 链接到本

   I suggest your revenue estimates for BT are now wide of the mark.我建议你的收入估计为英国电信现正广泛的马克。 This figure was based on ‘implementation by stealth’ with all users included by default.这个数字是基于'执行隐形'与所有用户，包括默认情况下。 Clearly the covert nature has been blown and the Information Commissioner now insists on an opt-in with informed consent.清楚的秘密性质，已被炸毁和信息专员，现在，坚持一个选择-在与知情同意。 BT won’t make a fraction of the figure you publish.英国电信将不会使一小部分的数字您发布。 Reply回复

7. Mick Meaney 米克meaney Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 2:24 pm | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在下午2时24分| Link to this 链接到本

   If they are making it an opt-in, then yes I agree they will not make anywhere near that amount.如果他们是使之成为一项选择-在，那么我同意，他们将不会作出任何地方，附近的金额。 Afterall who would opt-in for this?毕竟会选择谁-在此？ Reply回复

8. Sul 无薪假期 Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 2:26 pm | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在下午2时26分| Link to this 链接到本

   All you people have to do is search for phorm and you’ll find loads of information about it from good sources, the article is correct all you have to do is research it and stop listening to BT.所有的人，你需要做的就是寻找phorm ，你会发现载荷的相关资讯，从良好的来源，文章是正确的，所有你必须做的是研究并停止听Bt基因。 Reply回复

9. peter white 彼得白皮书 Posted: May 15th, 2008 at 2:32 pm | 发布时间： 2008年5月15日在下午2时32分| Link to this 链接到本

   how many opt-in depends on the spin and lies and how little real detail of just how intrusive the product is, presented for the users to make the “informed choice”有多少选择-在依赖于自旋和谎言，以及如何真正的小细节，只是如何侵入该产品，介绍了为用户作出“知情选择” if the full details of what the system can see and use then nobody in there right mind will opt-in如果全部细节什么样的制度可以看到和使用，然后在没有人有正确的态度会选择-在 also look at也要看 http://blog.iwr.co.uk/2008/05/behaviour-model.html this seems to detail the possible planned mission creap of phorm / webwise from serving adverts to serving / meddling with actual content这似乎是可能的详细计划任务creap的phorm / webwise从服务广告服务/插手的实际内容 Reply回复