BREAKING: Discover How A Slacker Makes $100,000 A Year!

WEBMASTERS! Get Your Website To The Top Of Google

Wired editor: Google has us all in its web

Sunday, March 29th, 2009

Google’s new Street View service - which displays 360-degree photographs of streetscapes in 25 British towns - has made it a challenge getting pages proof-read in the Wired offices this week. First, we spot the magazine’s associate editor in a skirt in a West London street (to be fair, he insists it is a kilt). Then we discover that Google’s face-blurring algorithm has bizarrely pixellated Bobby Sands’s face on a Belfast mural, presumably to protect what the software assumes is his privacy.

But Simon Davies, who runs a generally estimable campaign group called Privacy International, isn’t much amused. Street View, Mr Davies complained to the information commissioner this week, “has created numerous instances of embarrassment and distress”, and so he pledged to bring a legal test case.

Why? A 15-year-old had complained to Privacy International that Google snapped him carrying a skateboard “which his parents had expressly forbade him from using”; oh, and a married man was captured “speaking at close proximity with a female colleague”. Forget ID cards, registers of children’s DNA and government trawling of our e-mails - in Street View, we have finally identified the ultimate threat to British citizens’ liberty.

Well, no, actually. Although some of those photographed exiting sex shops or being sick in pub car parks may have prompted panicked deletions by Google’s public-relations machine, the public sphere remains essentially public. Despite the creeping incursions of French-style privacy legislation, one can still lawfully capture images from and of the British public commons - so it’s an absurdity for those sneaking a work-break cigarette, or flirting at a bus stop, to claim that somehow their rights have been breached by a passing camera. A right to absolute privacy in public? Get over it.

No, the real public threat from Google is its ever-inflating scale as an unregulated profit-seeking company to which we are entrusting unprecedented swaths of confidential information. What was once simply a niftily effective search company now serves as a personal calendar, an e-mail archive, a store of our word-processing documents, a video repository, a mobile-phone-tracking service, a road-travel itinerary - a vigilant monitor of our medical obsessions, physical movements and political leanings. And that’s fine, provided Google is transparent and sensitive about how it collects and uses our personal data, and that it guards it unfailingly. But as Privacy International pointed out, after a survey found Google to be the worst-ranked leading internet company for respecting user privacy, it is secretive, even hostile, about the use to which it puts our data, often for an indefinite length of time. That is something that should concern us all - especially with the boom in cloud computing.

Previously, we stored most of our data on computers that we controlled in our homes or workplaces. Today, as we rely increasingly on a “cloud” of distant servers to host our e-mail or calculate our taxes, we are shifting such information at an unprecedented scale to networks administered by private corporations. So let’s say you’ve archived your family photos on Google’s Picasa, your confidential accounts on Google Docs and revealed your sexual preferences during searches of Google Images. Admit it: you have no idea how this might be used to help advertisers to target you personally, or governments to profile you surreptitiously.

I write as an admirer of a company whose innovations have enriched our digital lives. But I worry that its dominance is outpacing governments’ ability to challenge it. Two years ago I warned about the online trail Google collected about you “for ever”, all linked to a personally identifiable Internet Protocol address. I suggested that their proposed $3.1 billion acquisition of DoubleClick, the ad-serving business built on “understanding” internet users, gave a worrying indication of its corporate thinking. DoubleClick had made proud assurances about users’ privacy protection, until its CEO was forced to admit the company had made a “mistake by planning to merge names with anonymous user activity across websites in the absence of government and industry privacy standards”.

Earlier this month, Google launched “interest-based advertising” - what others call behavioural targeting - serving advertisements to users based on their online activity. Yet Google is not simply monitoring what you do at its own pages - it is also tracking your interests as you access other unrelated websites. A key benefit, it says, is that it will be able to serve you adverts that more accurately reflect your interests. But do you really want one company to know so much about you? Privately held data has a habit of leaking out. As recently as March 7, a security flaw meant that private papers stored at Google Docs could be accessed by unauthorised users. Mistakes happen - but the volume of data that the firm holds makes it a target for malicious hackers.

Then there is the immutable law of the digital age that data collected for one purpose may be used for purposes never originally intended. We have no idea how future technologies will exploit our historic data trail in ways that may disadvantage us. Will life insurers penalise our past medical search queries, or the tax office fret that we are aspiring to products beyond our declared income?

What we do know is that one database has an innate desire to merge with another to create ever more detailed personal profiles. Wired journalists have been investigating how broadcast, telecoms and internet businesses are planning to mine our viewing and clicking data as never before. Already, your TV set-top box can provide a vast information trail, allowing analysts to know whether you’ve fallen asleep, who in the family is using the remote according to how they navigate the menu, and what (based on the shows and ads they view) they want out of life. Now, let’s imagine how much more powerful this information would be if linked to other personal databases - not just your internet trail, but your purchase history at the supermarket.

Add to this near-future scenario interactive digital billboards that recognise faces and serve targeted ads based on what the database knows about you. And then crunch in real-time mapping of your precise location, based on signals emitted from your mobile phone. All, of course, benign services that will benefit the consumer by targeting special offers when in the vicinity of a store … But have we debated sufficiently how we want such information to be used, and what is being done to ensure that it does not fall into the wrong hands?

Google - did I mention? - has a rather cool mobile-phone tracking program called Latitude, which lets you know where your friends are according to signals emitted from their phones. Again, all perfectly fun, and Google makes both parties opt in to being tracked. But let’s just imagine that a jealous partner gains access to your unattended phone and enables Latitude without your knowledge. Or government bureaucrats, never satisfied with the extent of their power to track the populace…

This is the moment for us to demand clear answers from the tech industry’s data crunchers, not only Google, and to educate ourselves about what we are giving away. Because when one unaccountable company knows where we are, who we’re e-mailing, what’s in our work documents, what we’re buying and thinking - well, that starts to add up to real information.

David Rowan is the editor of Wired magazine, which launches in the UK on Thursday

Have Your Say: Wired editor: Google has us all in its web
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

3 Responses to “Wired editor: Google has us all in its web”

BARBARA DELANEY
Posted: Mar 29th, 2009 at 12:12 pm

i think google if an arm of or atleast infiltrated by the CIA as James Woolsey’s venture capital firm has given 100’s of million in dollars to them. See links below.
I would have to say that if the former director of CIA under Regan and Bush? is involved in venture capital in the forex markets, gold and Google he is up to no good and we no longer have any free markets. Gain capital are crooks as I dealt with them that is how I found out Wolsey Invested in a very small forex firm that now advertizes on bloomberg. The CIA is in the gold, and forex markets and is manipulating them and all these tech co. are all covers to spy on the US public. That is my personal opinion

James Woolsey
… James Woolsey is a principal in the Paladin Capital Group, a venture-capital … Bush’s inner circle is fighting to gain his ear, and the result of this contest …home.earthlink.net/~platter/neo-conservatism/woolsey.html - Cached
James Woolsey

California International Business Report ” Venture Capital
… Paladin Homeland Security Fund, Palomar Ventures III and Belvedere Capital II. … co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page. …www.caltrade.com/news/category/industries/venture-capital - 84k - Cached

A survey of The future of energy: The energy alternatives | The …Jun 19, 2008 … Yet that is one tack James Woolsey is trying in order to reduce his country’s … Larry Page and Sergey Brin, the founders of Google, have started an outfit … one of Silicon Valley’s best-known venture-capital firms. …
http://www.economist.com/specialreports/displaystory.cfm?story_id=11565685 - Similar pages
More results from http://www.economist.com »

PDF] R. JAMES WOOLSEYFile Format: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - View as HTML
R. James Woolsey is a Venture Partner with VantagePoint Venture Partners of San Bruno, … fund, Paladin Capital Group; is a Senior Executive Advisor to the …
http://www.ieeeusa.org/calendar/conferences

1
Web Images Maps News Video Gmail more ▼Shopping

Groups

Books

Scholar

Finance

Blogs

YouTube

Calendar

Photos

Documents

Reader

Sites

even more »
Sign in

Google Advanced Search
Preferences

Web Results 1 - 10 of about 2,760 for james woolsey and venture capital and gain capital. (0.20 seconds)
Tip: Save time by hitting the return key instead of clicking on “search”

Search Resultsvantagepoint venture partners Resources | BNETMay 15, 2008 … of R. James Woolsey as Venture Partner and David Edwards as Partner. … Articles 2008-05-14; GAIN Capital Group Completes $117 Million … VantagePoint Venture Partners, one of the nation’s leading venture capital …
resources.bnet.com/topic/vantagepoint+venture+partners.html - 41k - Cached - Similar pages
James WoolseyMay 13, 2003 … James Woolsey, former CIA boss and influential adviser to President … is a principal in the Paladin Capital Group, a venture-capital firm that … Bush’s inner circle is fighting to gain his ear, and the result of this …
home.earthlink.net/~platter/neo-conservatism/woolsey.html - 12k - Cached - Similar pages
GridPoint Gets $15M and Big-Name AdvisersMar 28, 2008 … staff is busy searching to find the top 100 venture capital firms worldwide. … former Deputy Secretary of Energy; R. James Woolsey, …
http://www.redherring.com/Home/24040 - 47k - Cached - Similar pages
WHO DIES : Who Thrives?James Woolsey, former CIA director, friend of Ahmed Chalabi and member of the … Woolsey is also a principal in the Paladin Capital Group, a venture capital …. Bush adviser Karl Rove told Republicans to use the war to gain votes. …
http://www.whodies.com/thrives.html - 47k - Cached - Similar pages
Venture NewsletterVenture Capital. UF Start-Up AGTC Announces Initiation of Phase 1 Clinical Study … 2006, James Woolsey and Robert McFarlane cite UF ethanol researcher Lonnie … The Gainesville Area Innovation Network (GAIN) is inviting all community …
research.ufl.edu/otl/venture/ufventure.html - 28k - Cached - Similar pages
MIT Enterprise Forum - Entrepreneurship BroadcastENTERPRISING GEORGIA, a joint venture of the MIT Enterprise Forum and … Come and gain answers to these thought-provoking and timely questions: … R. James Woolsey is a Vice President and officer of Booz Allen Hamilton in … Woolsey is presently a principal in the Homeland Security Fund of Paladin Capital Group. …
enterpriseforum.mit.edu/network/broadcasts/200710/index.html - 28k - Cached - Similar pages
Cap in Hand: Power Companies Feel Credit Crunch, Too …Please register to gain free access to WSJ tools. …. you secured a large line of credit or venture capital, and proceeded without the administrative … Ironically: Duke Energy has close ties with Jim Woolsey. … Environmental Capital is led by Journal energy reporter Russell Gold, and includes …
blogs.wsj.com/environmentalcapital/2008/10/02/cap-in-hand-power-companies-feel-credit-crunch-too/ - 72k - Cached - Similar pages
Building a better grid | tallahassee.com | Tallahassee Democrat… because they allow small-scale producers to gain automatic access to the grid by … 8 a.m. R. James Woolsey presents to House Energy and Utility Committee. … of the Central Intelligence Agency and a venture partner with VantagePoint, … is visiting the capital at the invitation of the Florida Alliance for …
tallahassee.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=2009903100304 - 65k - Cached - Similar pages
venture investing posts - Green Tech - Page 2 - CNET NewsVenture capital investors have high hopes for green-tech companies. … a 60 percent gain over 2006, according to a United Nations report (PDF) Tuesday. … R. James Woolsey, the former CIA director, has been hired as a clean-tech …
news.cnet.com/8300-11128_3-54-1.html?keyword=venture+investing - 131k - Cached - Similar pages
The Shadow Government - The Center for Public IntegrityFormer CIA director James Woolsey is a principal in the Paladin Capital Group, a venture-capital firm that like Perle’s Trireme Partners is soliciting …
projects.publicintegrity.org/shadow/report.aspx?aid=91 - 25k - Cached - Similar pages

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next

Search within results - Language Tools - Search Tips - Dissatisfied? Help us improve - Try Google Experimental

Google Home - Advertising Programs - Business Solutions - Privacy - About Google

Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

Jules McConnaughey
Posted: Mar 29th, 2009 at 4:05 pm

Very balanced article, Mr. Rowan. You present the real issues and leave out the paranoia abundant in other blogs.

One thing, though - we do have the option to use other search engines and not to use cloud computing. Personally, I don’t trust distant servers and prefer to retain my data the old-fashioned way - on my hard drive, with regular backups. However, I’ll continue to use Google search because in my opinion, it provides the most pertinent search results. I have no habits I want to hide from the government or anyone else, but if I ever do I’ll choose an alternate means of searching.

Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

pingback:
Posted: Jun 20th, 2009 at 4:14 pm

ø Worldofwarcraft Paladin - Devastation Paladin Guide | World of Warcraft Info ø

[...] Wired editor: Google has us all in its web (The essay itself exemplifies “freemium”—free for anyone who wanders by WSJ.com, not just to those of us who pay to subscribe to the site’s full content.) It works for the consumer, or as Anderson puts it, “It’s a consumer’s paradise: The … Anderson has apparently changed his stance since his “Free” Wired article in which he was much more optimistic about the chances of zero prices. Both that article and this new one are free of any form of business sense whatsoever. … [...]

Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

SexyComments by BorkWeb

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News

This entry was posted on Sunday, March 29th, 2009 at 2:39 am and is filed under Science & Technology News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Translate: