Progressiv
Mittel-Aktivismus
Laden…
| Register | Verlorenes Kennwort? | Rundschreiben
Ein Kennwort wird zu Ihnen verschickt. LOGON | Verlorenes Kennwort?
Ein email wird Ihnen geschickt. LOGON | Register
Übersetzen Sie:
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish

Werkzeuge: Nachrichten | Pfosten-Anmerkung | Drucker-Version | Email zum Freund

Donnerstag, den 19. Juli 2007

Ermitteln Sicherheit Unternehmen Polizei spyware?

Teilen Sie diesen Artikel:

Diese Ikonen verbinden mit bookmarkenden Sozialaufstellungsorten, in denen Leser neue Webseiten teilen und entdecken können.
  • Digg
  • Slashdot
  • Technorati
  • StumbleUpon
  • del.icio.us
  • feedmelinks
  • Furl
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • De.lirio.us
  • blogmarks
  • Spurl
  • Fleck
  • Fark

Durch Declan McCullagh und Anne Broache

Eine neue Bundesgerichtshofentscheidung wirft die Frage von auf, ob antivirus Firmen spyware absichtlich übersehen können, das geheim auf Computer von der Polizei gesetzt wird.

In Fall früh entschieden dieser Monat durch die 9. US Schwurgericht von Anklänge, Bundesmittel benutzte spyware mit einem Tastenanschlag Blockwinde-benennen ihn fedware-zur Aufzeichnung das Schreiben eines vermuteten Ekstaseherstellers, der Verschlüsselung verwendete, um die Polizei zu vereiteln.

Eine CNET News.com übersicht von 13 führenden antispyware Verkäufern fand, daß nicht eine Firma cooperating unofficially mit Regierungsagenturen bestätigte. Some, however, indicated that they would not alert customers to the presence of fedware if they were ordered by a court to remain quiet.

Spyware survey

Most of the companies surveyed, which covered the range from tiny firms to Symantec and IBM, said they never had received such a court order. The full list of companies surveyed: AVG/Grisoft, Computer Associates, Check Point, eEye, IBM, Kaspersky Lab, McAfee, Microsoft, Sana Security, Sophos, Symantec, Trend Micro and Websense. Only McAfee and Microsoft flatly declined to answer that question. (Click here for the verbatim responses to the survey.)

Because only two known criminal prosecutions in the United States involve police use of key loggers, important legal rules remain unsettled. But key logger makers say that police and investigative agencies are frequent customers, in part because recording keystrokes can bypass the increasingly common use of encryption to scramble communications and hard drives. Microsoft’s Windows Vista and Apple’s OS X include built-in encryption.

Some companies that responded to the survey were vehemently pro-privacy. “Our customers are paying us for a service, to protect them from all forms of malicious code,” said Marc Maiffret, eEye Digital Security’s co-founder and chief technology officer. “It is not up to us to do law enforcement’s job for them so we do not, and will not, make any exceptions for law enforcement malware or other tools.” eEye sells Blink Personal for $25, which includes antivirus and antispyware features.

Others were more conciliatory. Check Point, which makes the popular ZoneAlarm utility, said it would offer federal police the “same courtesy” that it extends to legitimate third-party vendors that request to be whitelisted. A Check Point representative said, though, that the company had “never been” in that situation.

This isn’t exactly a new question. After the last high-profile case in which federal agents turned to a key logger, some security companies allegedly volunteered to ignore fedware. The Associated Press reported in 2001 that “McAfee Corp. contacted the FBI… to ensure its software wouldn’t inadvertently detect the bureau’s snooping software.” McAfee subsequently said the report was inaccurate.

Later that year, the FBI confirmed that it was creating spy software called “Magic Lantern” that would allow agents to inject keystroke loggers remotely through a virus without having physical access to the computer. (In both the recent Ecstasy case and the earlier key logging case involving an alleged mobster, federal agents obtained court orders authorizing them to break into buildings to install key loggers.)

Government agencies and backdoors in technology products have a long and frequently clandestine relationship. One 1995 expose by the Baltimore Sun described how the National Security Agency persuaded a Swiss firm, Crypto, to build backdoors into its encryption devices. In his 1982 book, The Puzzle Palace, author James Bamford described how the NSA’s predecessor in 1945 coerced Western Union, RCA and ITT Communications to turn over telegraph traffic to the feds.

More recently, after the BBC reported last year on supposed talks between the British government and Microsoft, the software maker pledged not to build backdoors into Windows Vista’s encryption functions.

 Section has more related reports

Help keep RINF going..

Comment on 'Will security firms detect police spyware?' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News:

  • Federal Agents Using Spyware
  • ‘Kill switch’ dropped from Vista
  • Government-sponsored cyberattacks on the rise
  • Court says no to CSIS wiretaps overseas
  • Users offered virus disguised as IE7

  • This entry was posted on Thursday, July 19th, 2007 at 8:07 pm and is filed under Sci Tech, Surveillance . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

    © RINF.COM Underground Gateway. All rights reserved.
    Send Alternative News And Breaking News To: Editor @ rinf.com
    There Are 584 Users Online Right Now
    Current Discussion - 695 Total Comments

    Brand Obama can’t take competition, hires Starbucks lawyer to fight Hillary… « Valentine Bonnaire on Obama's Blackwater Problem

    Breaking News