// Guest Post by Vic Smith from SEOever | Before the major search engines like Google became so finicky, the primary SEO strategy was to “build more links”. At that time, you could build a variety of links that were backed [...] Related posts:
  1. The Golden Rule of Effective SEO Link Building
  2. Creative On-Site Back-linking Link Building Techniques
" />

Home » SEO News »

How Much SEO Weight Does Link Building Carry In 2010?

 

Guest Post by Vic Smith from SEOever |

Before the major search engines like Google became so finicky, the primary SEO strategy was to “build more links”. At that time, you could build a variety of links that were backed by the original standard of thought – the more links the better.

Just a few years ago I was in such a rush to comment on blogs and forums, dozens of times per day that hundreds even thousands of links were built in a manner of months! During that period, backlinks were the deciding ranking factor, and their impact on search engines was overwhelming. Quantity!

In today’s link building, that train of thought is considered outdated. Google currently decreases the power that various links have on your ranking. Additionally, backlinks building is not anymore considered important, as most websites have lost their power, trust and authority through Search Engines’ manipulative tendencies of their webmasters.

Quality link building is still possible, but it is done through a new qualitative method, which happens to be the newest and most dominant trend, not quantity but quality.

Greater weight is being placed on authority, which is the confidence that others have in your website being high quality and offering no spam.

The trust issue may not be easily or exactly understood and is also quite subjective making impossible to measure the authority of a website at the time of link building – you can only see in time if a link is giving you in return PR juice, traffic or even both.

Today, Google’s algorithm is adjusted manually (this is what I believe, is just a personal opinion though) to place a vote of trust on websites and to utilize these sites as the standard, in order to locate useful pages instead of spam. With this said, in the SEO world today trust is much more paramount than page rank. If until today we were using as guides the PR, it seams that the Page Rank is not anymore something to trust but website authority. Sadly for SEOs, the authority, as we speak, is hard to determine when doing link building.

Although many links failed to maintain the value they once had, link building is still an important factor in deciding rank. Links will remain the foremost scalable SEO parameter aside from the website’s content. The popularity of a website, as well as the trust from a search engine, originates via links.

Links are a great way for search engines to simplify the status and relevance of a website. There are no current alternatives to links, even though some search engines are looking into possible future alternatives, such as user behavior and whatnot.

Website importance is parallel to having a natural, varied, and well-formed link profile. This profile will include pertinent links from academic sites, authority sites, forums, blogs, fan pages, discussion groups, consumer information, directories, and review sites, just to name a few. It will also include an assortment of links, such as “nofollow” and “do follow” links, to the same page, with different anchor texts. These include long tail keywords, deep links to existing pages that use longer tail anchor text, and genuine natural links.

The best piece of advice is to be sure that the link profile occurs at an even pace, or a natural pace, preferably without large spikes and long interruptions.

No Follow – Google changed the way in which the rel=”nofollow” attribute of links being used in 2009. Prior to this time, “nofollow” stopped page rank from following a link. “Nofollow” conserved the page ranking (PR) for the linking site known as PR-sculpting. Now, however, things have changed to where the “nofollow” will stop the page rank from following; but the amount of PR that would have followed is not thrown out.

In other words “nofollow” does not stop anymore search bots from following but in the same time, will block the PR delivery.

Vic Smith is a seasoned Web Developer and a SEO enthusiast, writing about the ways any website can achieve a good place in search results. He owns a Toronto SEO business addressing to small and family businesses and helping them to rank higher in Google SERPs.

 

Related Posts

  • No Related Posts
 
  • Pingback: 7 Simple SEO Tasks to Complete for a New Site – Search Engine Journal : SEO Blogger Tips | Free SEO Tips and Resources |

  • Pingback: News about Google Pagerank issue #1

  • Jerry S.

    I noticed the same thing, the link building got deprecated somehow. I have around 100 links from important websites, they were PR4-5 and now the majority are with 0. Also my PR has going down to 0 probably for the same reason.

    Now, to be honest I don’t give a damn on Google PR but I also noticed that I loosed the rank in SERPs which is not that OK.

    Any advice on this situation?

  • http://www.rinf.com Mick Meaney

    Good question.. one thing I'd look at Jerry, is the backlink frequency.. how quickly are you adding backlinks.. and how quickly are they disappearing.

    It's hard to predict what's causing the problem without looking through your site and the link profile (at least, what can be found publicly).

    Google say that PR doesn't influence rank.. I know that's up for debate.

    I'd say your best bet, if you do want to increase your PR is to update on a regular basis, with original content (no spun articles), don't link to spammy sites, and put the interest of your readership above all else – even Google.

  • http://www.freestuff4free.com/ FreeStuff4Free

    I still think link building does work and has value but it's more if you have a site that is in a very competitive keyword market is where quality will beat quantity. I mean if there's no competition then surely quantity is better than nothing.

  • Pingback: Choupal India » Blog Archive » Avoiding SEO Disasters

  • http://www.bikinis.tv roddy@BusinessShow

    It seems that perhaps the anchor text of the links may be more important at this point , the text stays the same and doesn't rely on the page rank which seems harder and harder to maintain

  • http://www.seoever.com Vic

    Roddy, sure, the link anchor is one of the most important think when doing link building. Also the authority of the website you are placing links on, has its importance.

    But there are others factors coming in place when doing link building as the frequency the page your have a link is coming into search results, the time spent by people on that page, the number of comments and rating that page has got (especially if is a blog article) and so on.

    Some friends of mine are getting crazy thinking that even the number of tweets / facebook "likes" a page get is influencing the links placed there, as a measure of the importance (popularity / authority / trust) a page can carry over to those links on it.

    In short the link building is getting complicated in the year of 2010. Too many factors (mostly unknown yet) are coming in place and getting good quality links has become a complex process.

    Mick, one of the ranking in search results, factors, is Google PR. Still no one know exactly how much, pretty much sure is getting deprecated nowadays.
    My recent post Desktop vs Mobile Searching 2010

    • http://www.rinf.com Mick Meaney

      Google are looking at social media sites like they are looking at forums, newswires and blogs to see if a brand/site is being discussed, so I'm guessing there's some truth that the number of tweets might play a (small) role in ranking.

      With anchor text, in my tests I've found it best to vary the keywords (other SEO's might have different results) because having 100% targeted anchor text looks unatural.. but that's just in my experience. I've got better results from mixing things up a bit compared to 100% targeted anchor text.

      Are you seeing similar results?

    • http://www.rinf.com Mick Meaney

      Gah.. comments will only let me post a long(er) reply if I split it up.

      Yep, looks like PR is on the way out or at least isn't as important as it was a few years ago. Last year Matt Cutts said: “We crawl roughly in the order of PageRank, that means the more PageRank you have the faster you are likely to be found and more deeply we crawl your site and more often we visit your pages if they have been refreshed.”

      As we know only too well, a year can be a long time in SEO.. so things might be different now, but even this statement might not be completely true.. and (again) I'm guessing the crawl rate can be temporarily influenced by Pubhubsubbub – but I haven't tested that theory yet.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_NHHPIIBKWQHYFOSQ7LM3BU3BTQ Paul Simon

    Yes, link building is the oldest techniques for optimizing the website. However, it is still in used widely for Increasing SERP of the page. Main concept to remember is that back links should be of relevant site. Google likes the natural ways for link building. Most of the seo firms like zigseoservices are using natural ways for creating back links.
    link building service