De V.N. drukken „ernstige zorg“ over de marteling van de CIA uit
De vertegenwoordiger van de V.N. drukt „ernstige zorg“ over de marteling van de CIA, hoorzittingen Guantánamo uit
Door Spencer Naomi
Na een bezoek vroeger deze maand aan de militaire gevangenis van de V.S. bij Baai Guantánamo, meldde een de rechten van de mensvertegenwoordiger van de Verenigde Naties aan de gang zijnde misbruik, gerechtelijke werkzaamheden te velde, en andere schendingen van internationale wet. Het rapport door de ambtenaar van de V.N., die de overheid van de V.S. belast met wijdverspreide misdadigheid, is bijna volledig genegeerd door de media van de V.S.
In een rapport aan de Rechten van de mens van de V.N. zeiden de vergadering van de Raad in Genève 13 December, de Speciale Rapporteur voor rechten van de mens en counterterrorism Martin Scheinin hij geloofde de CIA in zogenaamde „buitengewone vertolking blijft in dienst nemen,“ geheime detentions en marteling. Scheinin stelde voor dat honderden gevangenen die in Guantánamo worden gehouden werden vervolgd om geen revelaties van misbruik te houden van het te voorschijn komen. Tijdens zijn bezoek, mocht hij geen unmonitored interactie met gevangenen hebben.
Van de 305 gevangenen Guantánamo, ongeveer zijn 80 reeds gezet door de strijdende rechtbanken van het statusoverzicht (CSRT) en verklaard om „geen vijandelijke strijders te zijn,“ hoewel zij niet zijn vrijgegeven. De militairen hebben aangekondigd dat het van plan is om deze hoorzittingen voor nog eens 80 gevangenen te houden, waarna konden zij schijnbaar door militaire proef worden veroordeeld. Maar voor 150 zogenaamde „hoogwaardige“ gevangenen, bovengenoemde Scheinin, „Er is niet genoeg bewijsmateriaal dat, zelfs aan een militaire commissie zou kunnen worden voorgelegd die door een militaire rechter wordt voorgezeten. Gedeeltelijk er kan geen bewijsmateriaal zijn en gedeeltelijk is het risico van kwesties van marteling die te hoog.“ wordt opgeheven
“Bringing them to court would bring to the court’s attention the method through which the evidence, including the confessions, were obtained,” Scheinin told the press following his report.
Naast de recente revelaties dat de CIA ondervragingsbanden had vernietigd, zei hij de onbepaalde detentie zonder proef „één verdere bevestiging van de conclusie is dat de CIA of anderen in methodes van ondervraging zijn geïmpliceerdz die met internationale wet.“ onverenigbaar zijn De CIA, verklaarde Scheinin, is „geïmpliceerdd en gebleven in het gebruik van ondervragingstechnieken worden geïmpliceerdn die het absolute verbod tegen marteling.“ overtreden
De vernietiging van de de ondervragingsbanden die van de CIA de marteling van minstens twee gevangenen tonen onderstreept het basisfeit dat de ongehoorde rechten van de mensschendingen door de V.S. geen geïsoleerdez gebeurtenissen zijn. On the contrary, torture and illegal detentions have been the standard operating procedure for the CIA, with the cooperation of military brass and the support of the entire political establishment.
Scheinin said that in a meeting with representatives of the CIA during his visit to the United States, “the CIA refused to engage in any meaningful interaction aimed at clarifying the means of compliance with international standards of methods of interrogation and accountability in respect of possible abuses.” He also said the CIA refused to meet with him a second time. This stonewalling is yet further evidence of the lawlessness of the US government.
Significantly, Scheinin noted that behavior by CIA officials “supports the suspicion that the CIA has been involved and continues to be involved in the extraordinary rendition of terrorism suspects and possibly other persons.”
Moreover, the report concluded, “It is unlikely that the CIA would be able to run a global programme of rendition and detention of terrorist suspects without at least logistical support by the United States military authorities.”
Although the Bush administration declared that it held no other “high value” detainees in secret detention after transferring 14 to Guantánamo Bay from around the world in 2006, it reserved the possibility of resuming the practice whenever it wished, and has rendered at least one other detainee since then. Other suspected detainees remain missing.
It should not be forgotten that, in addition to those detainees being held at Guantánamo, the US continues to hold some 700 detainees in Afghanistan and approximately 18,000 detainees in Iraq. Many of these are classified by the US as “unlawful enemy combatants” in order to deny them fundamental legal rights.
While at the Guantánamo Bay prison, Scheinin observed the pre-trial military proceedings against Salim Ahmed Hamdan, the alleged former driver of Osama bin Laden. Hamdan, captured in Afghanistan in 2001, has been held at Guantánamo since 2002.
The drumhead character Hamdan’s CSRT was evident. “The hearings provided graphic illustrations of the practical difficulties in providing fair trials at a distant military base, and confirmed the difficulties or even impossibility of the defense to provide evidence,” Scheinin told the press. “Neither witnesses from abroad or high-value detainees from the Guantánamo detention facility next door could be heard, at least on this particular occasion.”
The written report is more specific: “These are administrative processes rather than judicial ones. Detainees are not provided with a lawyer during the course of hearings.” Even if all charges are dropped, “the most that a reviewing court may do is to order reconsideration of a decision, not release.” This violates international prohibitions on arbitrary detention, habeas corpus rights, the right to a timely trial, and other fundamental legal protections.
As could be expected, US media coverage of the report and the Hamdan CSRT has been nonexistent. Neither the New York Times, Washington Post, nor Los Angeles Times published an article on the topic, with the main coverage in the US coming from brief wire reports from the AP and Reuters.
Also typical, the response of the US government to the report has consisted largely of the attempt to dismiss and discredit it. Melanie Khanna, a US legal adviser, was quoted in both the AP and Reuters articles at some length. Khanna said that sections of Scheinin’s report dealing with legal violations by the US “simply catalogue well-known criticisms and fail even to acknowledge that there are multiple ways of approaching the difficult issues discussed…”
“We hope that in future the work of the Special Rapporteur proceeds differently,” Khanna said, claiming Scheinin’s description of the combatant status reviews was “in part misleading about the facts of the process, and revisits well-worn, ill-informed criticisms of military commissions hearings. The unfortunate fact is that a large part of the report again repeats unfair and oversimplified criticisms of the United States.”
However, the “well-worn” arguments against the military tribunals have also been made by the US Supreme Court—specifically in regard to the case of Hamdan—before this decision was scuttled by Congress in the 2006 Military Commissions Act. In that case, Hamdan v. Rumsfeld, the court ruled that President Bush did not have the authority to establish military commissions, and found them to be illegal under military law and the Geneva Conventions.
When Hamdan was subject to another military commission in June 2007, charges of conspiracy and supporting terrorism were thrown out by the military judge, who ruled that the commission lacked jurisdiction because Hamdan had not been officially classified as an “unlawful enemy combatant.”
The government appealed this decision, asking a military court to declare Hamdan an “unlawful enemy combatant” so he can be tried once again. A ruling has not been issued as of this writing. During the hearing, the defense was denied the request to call three “high value” detainees held at Guantánamo for testimony on the spurious grounds that the request was not timely because of the clearance required to access such prisoners. The detainees, Khalid Sheik Mohammed, Ramzi Bin al-Shib and Abu Faraj al-Libi, have all been subjected to CIA interrogations and torture.
See More:UNHave Your Say: UN expresses “grave concern” over CIA torture
Please note, only selected comments will be published.
Or discuss this report in our our new forums
This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 19th, 2007 at 1:07 pm and is filed under Political News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
Free Newsletter
Loading ...Related News
- U.N. suspects CIA may continue torture at Gitmo
- UN expert: Guantanamo hearings unfair
- United Nations: U.S. violated international law
- Guantánamo torture records lost
- U.N. rights expert investigating U.S. criticizes counterterror laws
Email This Page To A Friend
Latest Headlines
- Banksy throws London stencil party
- Nepal police detain 100 Tibetan protestors
- Ex-Guantanamo man: “Torture is terrorism”
- Why Gordon Brown should halt ID cards
- Sex offender DNA files expanded
- Secret Bush “Finding” Widens War on Iran
- Denying Palestinians Free Movement in the West Bank
- RINF Forums Now Online
- Pentagon Documents Highlight Torture Methods
- Poll: Bush most unpopular in modern history
More Breaking News
Archive