[رينف.كم]: ال يكسر أخبار خيار
|
![]() |
يكسر أخبار |
التدمير نظاميّة [فوت ريغت]
يوم الإثنين, يوليو-تمّوز [28ث], 2008 تناقشت هذا تقرير في ال [رينف] ساحات > ب [هيدي] [ستفنسن] | أنت أمكن فكّرت يتلقّى أنت الحق أن يقترع. أنت أمكن فكّرت ك إقتراع حسابات. أنت أمكن فكّرت أنّ هناك مشكلة هنا أو هناك, غير أنّ أنّ هم الاستثناء. أنت أمكن فكّرت أنّ ال 2000 كان إنتخاب رئاسيّة شذوذ, في أيّ الولايات المتّحدة الأمريكيّة محكمة عليا انتهك أخلاقية ويلاطف سوابق أن يتوّج الإنتخاب خاسرة, يقاوم [ث ويلّ] من الالناس. أنت أمكن فكّرت هو يستطيع لا من المحتمل كنت مشكلة جارية. أنت أمكن كنت جدّا بحزن أخطأت. [فوت ريغت] تحت هجوم نظاميّة في الولايات المتّحدة الأمريكيّة. تقنيات يتضمّنون: * [ديسنفرنشسمنت] صريحة. * إقتراع تحويل في إنتخاب آلات. * رفض أن يسمح الجمهور أن يرى كيف إقتراعات يكون عددت. * إستعمال من ال [بيوبل كورت] بأحزاب سياسيّة و مؤسسات أن يزعزع القانون. * إستعمال من قضية تهديدات بمؤسسات كبيرة ضدّ [كش-ستربّد] حكومة محلّيّة أن يمنعهم من يفحص يقترع آلات. [إش ون] أمكن لم يبدو مثل إصدار كبريات, غير أنّ يأخذ معا, هو واضحة أنّ هناك ينسّق هجوم على مواطنات أمريكيّة' حقوق أن يقترع. إقتراع ينقف يتبع مسمار بلا رأس [فريدمن] يتلقّى يكون المشكلة لسنون, غير أنّ يساوي هو كان بهتت عندما هو حدث إلى ه عندما هو اقترع في [لوس نجلس] أثناء يونيو - حزيران [3رد] كاليفورنيا إنتخاب: "يصحّ قبل أعيني جدّا, ال [كمبوتر-برينتد] اقتراع سرّيّ ينتج ب ال يقترع نظامة أنا كان استعملت, بشكل غير لائق يملأ داخل فقاقيع ل أربعة من الأجناس اقترع أنا كان [إين.]. تلقّيت أنا لا [ب] بشكل لا يصدّق حريصة, عقب [برينتد-ووت] الاقتراع سرّيّ كان, أن باجتهاد قارنت ماذا كان طبعت إلى ماذا أنا واقعيّا اقترعت ل, أنا يتلقّى أبدا عرفت إقتراعاتي كان يكون أعطيت إلى مرشحات أنا لم أقترع ل." بما أنّ [فريدمن] ذهب فوق أن يشير, إن هو كان قد كان عمياء, كان هناك ما من طريق أن يعرف أنّ إقتراعاته كان غيّرت. نقفت [فورتي] نسبة مئويّة من إقتراعاته كان. بسبب مرتفعه, [قورنتيند] الآلة هو كان قد اقترع فوق كان. لا أحد ازعج أن يفحص خارجا الإستراحة من الآلات في أنّ إقتراع مكان أو أخرى من ال نفسه نوع. مقترعة يحبس شرعيّة مقترعات الذي يكون مرجّحة أن يقترع ل ال "خاطئة" عيّنت مرشحات ومنهجيّا استثنيت من المقترعة ألفاظ. Different techniques are used, but one documented by reporter Greg Palast tells of one method. Before the 2004 election, military personnel who came from predominantly black neighborhoods were targeted. The Republican National Committee sent them letters addressed “Do Not Forward”. Most, if not all, of the addressees were serving their country in foreign lands. Lists were drawn up of the names on the letters that had been returned as undeliverable. The lists were sent to the RNC. These soldiers had been “caged”. Their voting registrations were challenged, based on the returned mail. Once their names had been removed from the voting rolls — without any attempts to locate and inform them — they lost the right to vote in the next election, whether they had returned home and gone to the polls or they had sent absentee ballots. Through voter caging and other techniques, over half a million voters were disenfranchised during the 2004 election. The vast majority of those who were disenfranchised by caging were black military personnel. Lack of Transparency in Vote Counting In the recent June 3rd election in Monterey, California, two election observers were harassed and prevented from observing the process and the equipment used for tabulating votes. From the first, when they formally requested access, citing the California code that specifies the rules for observation — which quite clearly gives the right to check out all phases of the election, along with all computer and tabulating equipment — they were stonewalled. In spite of the attempts to stop them, Valerie Lane and Brian Rothenberger were able to see obviously illegal activities and clear indications that it would be easy to tamper with the vote count. They were stalled, ordered to leave, and threatened with arrest. The second article in this series will discuss the specifics of how Mr. Rothenberger and Ms. Lane were prevented from doing precisely what the law — and democracy — requires. Lawsuit Threat In New Jersey’s Union County, paper records of the number of voters in the recent primary election did not match the results produced by Sequoia Voting Systems’ machine printouts. Naturally, the County Clerk, Joanne Rajoppi, wanted the problem investigated. The Constitutional Officers Association of New Jersey, an organization of state sheriffs, county clerks, and other similar officials, concurred, calling for an independent review. They planned to have it done by a Princeton University computer scientist who has experience with voting machines. It isn’t going to happen. Sequoia claims, without any proof, that the errors were the result of errors by poll workers — an interesting concept, considering it’s never happened before. Using double-speak without a hint of embarrassment, they say that they “welcome all such responsibly executed review activities.” How that can be done, though, they don’t say — but they aren’t going to let Union County do an investigation. Sequoia threatened a lawsuit against Union County, claiming that an independent investigation would violate their licensing agreement. The county has no option but to capitulate. The cost of defending such a lawsuit is prohibitive for them. Left in the balance are the voters who have been disenfranchised. A Chilling Subversion of Our Democracy The implications for American democracy are chilling. A concerted and systematic effort has been underway to prevent the will of the people from being heard. The very basis of the governance of our nation is at extreme risk. Thomas Jefferson wrote: “Should things go wrong at any time, the people will set them to rights by the peaceable exercise of their elective rights.” He had faith in the people’s ability to make good decisions through voting. What would he think now, when that most basic of freedoms — the one at the heart of our society — is becoming a ghost, nothing more than the image of what it was meant to be? Alexander Hamilton said that a republic’s right to vote “ought to stand foremost in the estimation of the law.” Now, the right to vote is becoming little more than a shadow cast behind the actions of those who cast their votes into a void. Increasingly, it exists more in form than in substance. Different techniques that have been used — and continue to be used — will be discussed in depth in upcoming articles. The only way to stop the theft of democracy is through awareness of what’s happening. If you know that you’re a potential target of vote theft, then you can protect both yourself and the future of the nation. References The Brad Blog, by Brad Friedman, (http://www.bradblog.com/?p=6043) , (http://www.blackboxvoting.org/) Black Box Voting, (http://www.blackboxvoting.org/) “Buffalo Soldiers Scrubbed by Secret GOP Hit List”, by Greg Palast, ((http://www.gregpalast.com/massacre-of-t…) “Plan for voting machine probe dropped after lawsuit threat”, by Diane C. Walsh, Real-Time News, ((http://www.nj.com/news/index.ssf/2008/0…) “Sequoia Threatens Lawsuit Over E-Voting Machine Review”, by K.C. Jones, Information Week, ((http://www.informationweek.com/news/man…) About the author* Heidi Stevenson, BSc, DIHom, FBIH Discuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: The Systematic Destruction of Voting Rights This entry was posted on Monday, July 28th, 2008 at 7:38 pm and is filed under Political News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site. |
Translations![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |