The Prosecution of George W. Bush起訴布什
By通過 Vincent Bugliosi文森特布廖西 | There is direct evidence that President George W. Bush did not honorably lead this nation, but deliberately misled it into a war he wanted. |有直接證據表明，布什總統並沒有非常嚴重導致這個國家，但故意誤導它變成一場戰爭，他想。 Bush and his administration knowingly lied to Congress and to the American public — lies that have cost the lives of more than 4,000 young American soldiers and close to $1 trillion.布什和他的政府明知說謊，向國會和美國公眾-謊言有成本的生命， 4 000多年輕的美國士兵和接近1萬億美元。
A Monumental Lie一個巨大的謊言
In his first nationally televised address on the Iraqi crisis on October 7, 2002, six days after receiving the National Intelligence Estimate (NIE), a classified CIA report, President Bush told millions of Americans the exact opposite of what the CIA was telling him -a monumental lie to the nation and the world.在他的首全國發表電視講話對伊拉克危機對2002年10月7日，六天後，接到國家情報評估（聶） ，中央情報局的一份機密報告，美國總統布什說，數百萬美國人完全相反的是什麼中情局告訴他-一個巨大的謊言向全國和世界。
On the evening of October 7, 2002, the very latest CIA intelligence was that Hussein was not an imminent threat to the US This same information was delivered to the Bush administration as early as October 1, 2002, in the NIE, including input from the CIA and 15 other US intelligence agencies.關於傍晚2002年10月7日，最新的美國中央情報局的情報是，侯賽因是不是一個迫在眉睫的威脅到美國的這一相同的信息，被送到布什政府早在2002年10月1日，在聶，包括投入，從美國中央情報局和其他15個美國情報機構。 In addition, CIA director George Tenet briefed Bush in the Oval Office on the morning of October 7th.此外，美國中央情報局局長特尼特介紹了布什在橢圓形辦公室於當天上午10月7日。
According to the October 1, 2002 NIE, “Baghdad for now appears to be drawing a line short of conducting terrorist attacks with conventional or CBW [chemical and biological warfare] against the United States, fearing that exposure of Iraqi involvement would provide Washington a stronger case for making war.” The report concluded that Hussein was not planning to use any weapons of mass destruction; further, Hussein would only use weapons of mass destruction he was believed to have if he were first attacked, that is, he would only use them in self-defense.根據該2002年10月1日，聶， “巴格達現在看來，要畫線短期進行的恐怖襲擊與常規或生化武器[化學和生物戰]對美國，怕暴露伊拉克的參與將提供更強的華盛頓案件作出戰爭“的報告的結論認為，薩達姆不打算使用任何大規模殺傷性武器;此外，侯賽因只會使用大規模殺傷性武器，他被認為是有，如果他是第一次攻擊，那就是，他將只使用他們在自衛的需要。
Preparing its declassified version of the NIE for Congress, which became known as the White Paper, the Bush administration edited the classified NIE document in ways that significantly changed its inference and meaning, making the threat seem imminent and ominous.編寫其解密版本的聶為國會，後者後來被稱為白皮書，布什政府已修改分類聶文件的方式，大大改變了其推理和意義，使迫在眉睫的威脅似乎是不祥的。
In the original NIE report, members of the US intelligence community vigorously disagreed with the CIA’s bloated and inaccurate conclusions.在原來的聶報告，委員對美國情報界大力同意與中央情報局的臃腫和不準確的結論。 All such opposing commentary was eliminated from the declassified White Paper prepared for Congress and the American people.所有這些反對的評論被淘汰，從解密的白皮書編寫的國會和美國人民。
The Manning Memo人手備忘錄
On January 31, 2003, Bush met in the Oval Office with British Prime Minister Tony Blair.對2003年1月31日，布什會見了在橢圓形辦公室與英國首相布萊爾。 In a memo summarizing the meeting discussion, Blair’s chief foreign policy advisor David Manning wrote that Bush and Blair expressed their doubts that any chemical, biological, or nuclear weapons would ever be found in Iraq, and that there was tension between Bush and Blair over finding some justification for the war that would be acceptable to other nations.在一份備忘錄中總結了會議的討論，布萊爾的首席外交政策顧問戴維曼寧寫道，布什和布萊爾表示懷疑，任何化學，生物或核武器，將永遠不會在伊拉克發現的，並有之間的緊張關係布什和布萊爾超過找到一些理由的戰爭將是可以接受的其他國家。 Bush was so worried about the failure of the UN inspectors to find hard evidence against Hussein that he talked about three possible ways, Manning wrote, to “provoke a confrontation” with Hussein.布什是這樣擔心失敗，聯合國核查人員找到確鑿證據對侯賽因說，他談到了三個可能的方法，曼寧寫道， “挑起對抗”與侯賽因。 One way, Bush said, was to fly “U2 reconnaissance aircraft with fighter cover over Iraq, [falsely] painted in UN colors.方法之一，布什說，這是飛“ U2的偵察飛機與戰鬥機在伊拉克上空封面， [附有虛假產地來源標籤]畫在聯合國的顏色。 If Saddam fired on them, he would be in breach” of UN resolutions and that would justify war.如果薩達姆對他們開槍，他將在違反“聯合國決議，這將是戰爭的理由。 Bush was calculating to create a war, not prevent one.布什計算，以創造一個戰爭，而不是防止一。
Denying Blix’s Findings無可否認，布利克斯的調查結果
Hans Blix, the United Nation’s chief weapons inspector in Iraq, in his March 7, 2003, address to the UN Security Council, said that as of that date, less than 3 weeks before Bush invaded Iraq, that Iraq had capitulated to all demands for professional, no-notice weapons inspections all over Iraq and agreed to increased aerial surveillance by the US over the “no-fly” zones.漢斯布利克斯，聯合國的首席武器檢查員在伊拉克，他在2003年3月7日，地址提交到聯合國安理會表示，由於該日期的，少於3個星期前，布什入侵伊拉克，伊拉克已經投降所有要求專業，沒有事先通知的武器檢查所有在伊拉克上空，並獲通過增加空中偵察，由美國在“禁飛區”地帶。 Iraq had directed the UN inspectors to sites where illicit weapons had been destroyed and had begun to demolish its Al Samoud 2 missiles, as requested by the UN.伊拉克已指示聯合國核查人員的網站的非法武器已被銷毀，並已開始拆除其薩穆德二型導彈，要求聯合國。 Blix added that “no evidence of proscribed activities have so far been found” by his inspectors and “no underground facilities for chemical or biological production or storage were found so far.” He said that for his inspectors to absolutely confirm that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction (WMD) “will not take years, nor weeks, but months.”布利克斯補充說： “沒有證據顯示被禁止的活動至今已被發現”他的督察及“沒有地下設施，化學或生物武器的生產或儲存被發現至今。 ”他說，他的督察，絕對證實，伊拉克沒有核武器大規模殺傷性（大規模殺傷性武器） “將不會需時多年，也不是幾個星期，而是幾個月” 。
Mohamed ElBaradei, the chief UN nuclear inspector in Iraq and director of the International Atomic Energy Agency, told the UN Security Council that, “we have to date found no evidence or plausible indication of the revival of a nuclear weapon program in Iraq.”穆罕默德巴拉迪，行政聯合國核檢查員在伊拉克和主任國際原子能總署，告訴聯合國安理會說， “我們已迄今為止沒有發現任何證據或跡象顯示可能復甦的一個核武器計劃在伊拉克” 。
The UN inspectors were making substantial progress and Hussein was giving them unlimited access.聯合國核查人員均取得重大進展和侯賽因是給予他們的無限次訪問。 Why was Bush in such an incredible rush to go to war?為什麼布什在這樣一個令人難以置信的繁忙去戰爭？
Hussein Disarms, so Bush … Goes to War侯賽因解除武裝，使布什…去戰爭
When it became clear that the whole purpose of Bush’s prewar campaign — to get Hussein to disarm — was being (or already had been) met, Bush and his people came up with a demand they had never once made before — that Hussein resign and leave Iraq.當人們清楚地看到整個的目的，布什的戰前的運動-得到侯賽因解除武裝-正在（或已被）會晤，布什和他的人成立了一個需求，他們從來沒有一次，之前所作的-侯賽因辭職和離開伊拉克。 On March 17, 2003, Bush said in a speech to the nation that, “Saddam Hussein and his sons must leave Iraq within 48 hours. 3月17日， 2003年，布什說，在一次講話中向全國， “薩達姆侯賽因和他的兒子必須離開伊拉克在48小時內。 Their refusal to do so will result in military conflict.” Military conflict — the lives of thousands of young Americans on the line — because Bush trumped up a new line in the sand?他們拒絕這樣做將導致軍事衝突的“軍事衝突-生命的數千名年輕的美國人就行-因為布什捏造了一個新的線在沙子裡呢？
The Niger Allegation尼日爾的指控
One of the most notorious instances of the Bush administration using thoroughly discredited information to frighten the American public was the 16 words in Bush’s January 28, 2003 State of the Union speech: “The British government has learned that Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of uranium from Africa.” The Niger allegation was false, and the Bush administration knew it was false.其中最惡名昭彰的實例，布什政府使用，徹底抹黑的資料，嚇唬美國公眾是16的話，布什的2003年1月28日發表的國情咨文講話中說： “英國政府獲悉，薩達姆侯賽因最近尋求大量鈾來自非洲的“尼日爾的指控是虛假的，布什政府知道這是假的。
Joseph C. Wilson IV, the former ambassador to Iraq, was sent to Niger by the CIA in February 2002 to investigate a supposed memo that documented the sale of uranium yellowcake (a form of lightly processed ore) to Iraq by Niger in the late 1990s.約瑟夫威爾遜四，前駐伊拉克大使，被送往尼日爾由中央情報局在2002年2月調查一假定的備忘錄記載了出售鈾黃餅（一種形式的輕率處理礦石）向伊拉克尼日爾在20世紀90年代末。 Wilson reported back to the CIA that it was “highly doubtful” such a transaction had ever taken place.衛奕信報回給美國中央情報局，這是“高度懷疑”此類交易曾經發生。
On March 7, 2003, Mohamed ElBaradei told the UN Security Council that “based on thorough analysis” his agency concluded that the “documents which formed the basis for the report of recent uranium transactions between Iraq and Niger are in fact not authentic.” Indeed, author Craig Unger uncovered at least 14 instances prior to the 2003 State of the Union address in which analysts at the CIA, the State Department, or other government agencies that had examined the Niger documents “raised serious doubts about their legitimacy — only to be rebuffed by Bush administration officials who wanted to use them.”對2003年3月7日，穆罕默德巴拉迪說，聯合國安理會“的基礎上深入分析” ，其管轄的機構得出結論認為， “文件形成的基礎，報告最近的鈾之間的交易，伊拉克和尼日爾的，其實不是真實的” 。事實上， ，作者克雷格昂格爾發現至少有14實例之前， 2003年發表的國情咨文中，分析師在中央情報局，國務院，或其他政府機構已審查了尼日爾的文件“提出嚴重質疑其合法性-不僅要碰壁由布什政府官員誰想利用他們“ 。
On October 5 and 6, 2002, the CIA sent memos to the National Security Council, National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice, and to the White House Situation Room stating that the Niger information was no good. 10月5日和6月， 2002年，美國中央情報局發出備忘錄，以國家安全委員會，國家安全顧問康多莉扎賴斯和白宮情況室指出，尼日爾的資料是沒有好。
On January 24, 2003, four days before the president’s State of the Union address, the CIA’s National Intelligence Council, which oversees all federal agencies that deal with intelligence, sent a memo to the White House stating that “the Niger story is baseless and should be laid to rest.”對2003年1月24日，四天之前，總統的發表的國情咨文，中央情報局的國家情報委員會，負責監督所有聯邦機構處理與情報，發出一份備忘錄中向白宮指出， “尼日爾的故事是毫無根據的，並應訂定的休息“ 。
The 9/11 Lie 9 / 11謊言
The Bush administration put undue pressure on US intelligence agencies to provide it with conclusions that would help them in their quest for war.布什政府施加不當的壓力對美國情報機構向它提供的結論，這將有助於他們在追求戰爭。 Bush’s former counterterrorism chief, Richard Clarke, said that on September 12, 2001, one day after 9/11, “The President in a very intimidating way left us — me and my staff — with the clear indication that he wanted us to come back with the word that there was an Iraqi hand behind 9/11.”布什的前反恐行政，理查德克拉克說， 9月12日， 2001年，一天後， 9 / 11 ， “總統在一個非常恐嚇的方式，給我們留下了-我和我的工作人員-與清楚地表明，他希望我們回來與Word有是伊軍的一個手背後9 / 11 “ 。
Bush said on October 7, 2002, “We know that Iraq and the Al Qaeda terrorist network share a common enemy — the United States of America.布什說， 10月7日， 2002年， “我們知道，伊拉克和蓋達組織的恐怖網絡共享一個共同的敵人-美國。 We know that Iraq and Al Qaeda have had high level contacts that go back a decade,” and that “Iraq has trained Al Qaeda members in bomb-making and poisons and deadly gasses.” Of Hussein, he said on November 1, 2002, “We know he’s got ties with Al Qaeda.”我們知道，伊拉克和蓋達組織有高層次的接觸，回去十年“ ， ”伊拉克已受過訓練的基地組織成員在製造炸彈及毒藥和致命的氣體“ 。侯賽因，他說，二零零二年十一月一日， “我們知道他有關係，與基地組織” 。
Even after Bush admitted on September 17, 2003, that he had “no evidence” that Saddam Hussein was involved with 9/11, he audaciously continued, in the months and years that followed, to clearly suggest, without stating it outright, that Hussein was involved in 9/11.甚至後，布什承認， 9月17日， 2003年，他已“沒有證據”表明薩達姆參與了9 / 11 ，他audaciously繼續，在幾個月和幾年之後，清楚地表明，沒有說明它買斷賣斷，即侯賽因曾參與在9 / 11 。
On March 20, 2006, Bush said, “I was very careful never to say that Saddam Hussein ordered the attack on America.”對2006年3月20日，布什說， “我是很小心，從來沒有說薩達姆下令對美國的攻擊” 。
Vincent Bugliosi received his law degree in 1964.文森特布廖西收到他的法律學位，於1964年。 In his career at the LA County District Attorney’s office, he successfully prosecuted 105 out of 106 felony jury trials, including 21 murder convictions without a single loss.在他的職業生涯在洛杉磯縣地區檢察官的辦公室，他成功檢控105 106重罪陪審團的審訊，其中包括21謀殺定罪，沒有一個單一的損失。 His most famous trial, the Charles Manson case, became the basis of his classic, Helter Skelter, the biggest selling true-crime book in publishing history.他最著名的審判中，查爾斯-曼森的情況下，成為根據他的經典， h elter所向披靡，銷量最大的真實犯罪圖書出版業的歷史。 The Prosecution of George W. Bush For Murder is available May 27.起訴布什謀殺是可用的5月27日。
See More: 看到更多的： USA News 美國新聞Have Your Say: The Prosecution of George W. Bush 你說：起訴布什
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的我們的新論壇
3 Responses to “The Prosecution of George W. Bush” 3回應“起訴布什”
pingback: pingback ：
Posted: May 12th, 2008 at 6:26 am | 發布時間： 2008年5月12日在上午06時26分| Link to this 鏈接到本
Politics in America » The Prosecution of George W. Bush政治在美國»起訴布什Keith E 祁俊文e
Posted: May 13th, 2008 at 4:25 am | 發布時間： 2008年5月13日在上午04時25分| Link to this 鏈接到本Reply回复If our nation doesn’t take legal action against this corrupt administration we will never regain our standing in the world of nations.如果我們的國家不採取法律行動這個腐化的政府，我們絕不會恢復我們的會議在世界上的國家。 We also need to do it for our own collective conscience and bring America back from the brink of the dark chasm that we have faced for the last seven years.我們也需要這樣做我們自己的集體良知和使美國回來的邊緣，黑暗的鴻溝，我們所面臨的最後七年。 The obstruction from the nationalists and neocons can not be allowed to deter us from this necessity.阻撓，從民族主義和新保守主義者，不能讓阻止我們從這個必要性。 If justice is not served in this then it should be removed from our national vocabulary for no lesser crimes can ever be judged under the cover of “justice” again.如果司法是不是在這方面服務的話，應予取消，從我們國家的詞彙，沒有較輕罪行都不能判斷的掩護下， “正義” 。
Scott Rhinehart 斯科特rhinehart
Posted: May 19th, 2008 at 12:52 am | 發布時間： 2008年5月19日在上午12時52分| Link to this 鏈接到本Reply回复I believe that it is way to late to do anything about this or any other hanous thing the leader or leaders of this country has done and continue to do at present I also believe that this country has not been ORDERD by its own people for some time now thier just isnt enough people who care enough to even hear the truth much less do anything about it and the ones who do are td few and do posses enough power .我相信這是方法，晚做任何有關此或任何其他hanous件事的領導人或領導人，這個國家已做和繼續這樣做，目前我也相信這樣的國家沒有得到orderd由本國人民的一段時間，現在他們只是isn't足夠多的人誰照顧不夠，甚至聽到真話少得多做任何關於它和那些誰做的運輸署數並擁有足夠的電源。
Free Newsletter 免費通訊 
Related News 相關新聞
- Only 3% of Americans support sending more troops to Iraq只有3 ％的美國人支持派遣更多部隊到伊拉克
- Had media done their job, there’d be no Iraq War有媒體做他們的工作，有要沒有伊拉克戰爭
- Ex-CIA chief criticises Iraq war前中情局首席批評伊拉克戰爭
- CIA boss warned Bush on UK intelligence中情局老闆告誡布什對英國的情報
- CIA issued dire warnings before Iraq invasion美國中央情報局發出可怕的警告之前，美國入侵伊拉克
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
- Olmert to US: Impose naval blockade on Iran奧爾默特美國：實行海上封鎖對伊朗
- DU Shells Used by US Worse Than Nuclear Weapons杜砲彈所使用的美國遜於核武器
- US Soldiers Did ‘Dirty Work’ for Chinese Interrogators美軍士兵沒有'骯髒的工作' ，為中國審問
- Heart experts warn Tasers deadly心臟專家警告泰瑟槍致命
- Consciousness of Guilt: Genocide in Iraq?意識的罪惡感：種族滅絕在伊拉克？
- UK may store all phone calls and emails英國可能儲存的所有電話和電子郵件
- FBI Report Details Guantánamo War Crimes聯邦調查局的報告詳細說明了關塔那摩的戰爭罪行
- CIA death squads killing with “impunity” in Afghanistan美國中央情報局行刑隊殺害與“有罪不罰的現象”在阿富汗
- Why should we pay the Orwellian licence fee?我們為什麼要支付奧威爾的牌照費？
- Firms await verdict on £2 billion ID cards project公司正等待判決英鎊， 20.0億的身份證項目
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞
Archive 存檔
[…] North by Northwest wrote an interesting post today onHere’sa quick excerptBy Vincent Bugliosi | There is direct evidence that President George W. Bush did not honorably lead this nation, but deliberately misled it into a […] [ … … ]北西北寫了一個有趣的郵政今日onhere'sa快速excerptby文森特布廖西|有直接證據表明，布什總統並沒有非常嚴重導致這個國家，但故意誤導，它成為一個[ … … ]