The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder起诉布什谋杀案
By Vincent Bugliosi | With respect to the position I take about the crimes of George Bush, I want to state at the outset that my motivation is not political.由文森特布廖西|与尊重的立场，我是否有关的罪行，布什，我想国家在开始时，我的动机是不是政治。 Although I’ve been a longtime Democrat (primarily because, unless there is some very compelling reason to be otherwise, I am always for “the little guy”), my political orientation is not rigid.虽然我已经长期民主党（主要是因为，除非有一些非常令人信服的理由，否则，我始终为“小人物” ） ，我国的政治方向，是不严格。 For instance, I supported John McCain’s run for the presidency in 2000.举例来说，我支持麦凯恩的竞选总统在2000年。 More to the point, whether I’m giving a final summation to the jury or writing one of my true crime books, credibility has always meant everything to me.更多一点，无论我作最后的总结，向陪审团或写作我的一个真实犯罪的书籍，信誉一向意味着一切给我。 Therefore, my only master and my only mistress are the facts and objectivity.因此，我唯一的硕士和我唯一的情妇都是事实性和客观性。 I have no others.我没有其他人。 This is why I can give you, the reader, a 100 percent guarantee that if a Democratic president had done what Bush did, I would be writing the same, identical piece you are about to read.Perhaps the most amazing thing to me about the belief of many that George Bush lied to the American public in starting his war with Iraq is that the liberal columnists who have accused him of doing this merely make this point, and then go on to the next paragraph in their columns.这就是为什么我可以给你，读者，百分之百的保证，如果民主党总统做了什么，布什，我会以书面形式相同，相同的作品您即将read.perhaps最了不起的事，向我有关的信念，很多人说谎，布什向美国民众在开始他的伊拉克战争是自由专栏作家，谁曾指责他这样做的，只是这一点，然后去上下段在其列。 Only very infrequently does a columnist add that because of it Bush should be impeached.只有很少是否专栏作家补充一点，就是因为它布什应该被弹劾。 If the charges are true, of course Bush should have been impeached, convicted, and removed from office.如果收费是真的话，当然，布什应该已经被弹劾，被定罪，并免职。 That’s almost too self-evident to state.这几乎太不言自明的国家。 But he deserves much more than impeachment.但他不愧远不止弹劾。 I mean, in America, we apparently impeach presidents for having consensual sex outside of marriage and trying to cover it up.我的意思是，在美国，我们显然弹劾总统后，协商一致的性别以外的婚姻和试图掩盖起来。 If we impeach presidents for that, then if the president takes the country to war on a lie where thousands of American soldiers die horrible, violent deaths and over 100,000 innocent Iraqi civilians, including women and children, even babies are killed, the punishment obviously has to be much, much more severe.如果我们弹劾总统，那么，如果总统把国家的战争谎言数千名美军士兵死亡的可怕，暴力死亡和超过十万无辜的伊拉克平民，包括妇女和儿童，甚至婴儿被杀害，处罚显然有要得多，严重得多。 That’s just common sense.这只是普通常识。 If Bush were impeached, convicted in the Senate, and removed from office, he’d still be a free man, still be able to wake up in the morning with his cup of coffee and freshly squeezed orange juice and read the morning paper, still travel widely and lead a life of privilege, still belong to his country club and get standing ovations whenever he chose to speak to the Republican faithful.如果布什总统被弹劾，定罪，在参议院，并解除了职务，他要仍是一个自由的人，仍然能够醒来是在早上与他的一杯咖啡和新鲜挤出橙汁，并宣读了上午的文件，仍旅行广泛，并导致生命的特权，仍然属于他的乡村俱乐部和获得常委会ovations时，他选择了发言，共和党的忠实。 This, for being responsible for over 100,000 horrible deaths?* For anyone interested in true justice, impeachment alone would be a joke for what Bush did.这一点，被负责超过十万可怕的死亡？ *有兴趣的人士在真正的正义，弹劾案，仅会是一个笑话什么，布什。
Let’s look at the way some of the leading liberal lights (and, of course, the rest of the entire nation with the exception of those few recommending impeachment) have treated the issue of punishment for Bush’s cardinal sins. New York Times columnist Paul Krugman wrote about “the false selling of the Iraq War.让我们看看方式一些领导自由灯（和，当然，其余的全民族的与除少数建议弹劾）对待的问题，处罚对布什的枢机主教的罪过。 纽约时报专栏作家保罗克鲁格曼写的“虚假销售的伊拉克战争。 We were railroaded into an unnecessary war.” Fine, I agree.我们railroaded成为一个不必要的战争“ 。罚款，我同意。 Now what?现在该怎么做？ Krugman just goes on to the next paragraph.克鲁格曼刚下去，到下一个段落。 But if Bush falsely railroaded the nation into a war where over 100,000 people died, including 4,000 American soldiers, how can you go on to the next paragraph as if you had been writing that Bush spent the weekend at Camp David with his wife?但如果布什附有虚假产地来源标签railroaded国家进入战争，超过十万人死亡，其中包括4000名美军士兵，你如何能下去，到下一个段落，作为如果您已以书面形式，布什花了上周末在戴维营与他的妻子？ For doing what Krugman believes Bush did, doesn’t Bush have to be punished commensurately in some way?这样做有什么克鲁格曼认为，布什并没有布什要受到惩罚， commensurately以某种方式呢？ Are there no consequences for committing a crime of colossal proportions?有没有后果犯下的罪行庞大的比例？
Al Franken, on the “David Letterman” show, said, “Bush lied to us to take us to war” and quickly went on to another subject, as if he was saying “Bush lied to us in his budget.”基地弗兰肯，对“大卫赖特曼”显示，说： “布什，向我们撒谎，以把我们带到战争” ，并迅速到对另一个问题，正如如果他说： “布什，向我们撒谎在他的预算案” 。
Sen. Edward Kennedy, condemning Bush, said that “Bush’s distortions misled Congress in its war vote” and “No president of the United States should employ distortion of truth to take the nation to war.” But, Senator Kennedy, if a president does this, as you believe Bush did, then what?参议员爱德华肯尼迪，谴责布什说， “布什的扭曲，误导国会在其战争投票”和“没有美国总统必须聘请歪曲真相，采取民族战争” 。不过，参议员肯尼迪，如果一个总统是否这方面，正如您认为布什没有，那么是什么呢？ Remember, Clinton was impeached for allegedly trying to cover up a consensual sexual affair.请记住，克林顿被弹劾，据称试图掩盖一个协商一致的性事。 What do you recommend for Bush for being responsible for more than 100,000 deaths?你有什么建议，为布什负责以上十万人死亡？ Nothing?什么？ He shouldn’t be held accountable for his actions?他不应该被追究责任，为他的行动呢？ If one were to listen to you talk, that is the only conclusion one could come to.如果一个人听您讲话，这是唯一的结论之一，可以来。 But why, Senator Kennedy, do you, like everyone else, want to give Bush this complete free ride?但为什么，参议员肯尼迪，你，和其他人一样，不想给布什，这完全免费乘坐呢？
The New York Times , in a June 17, 2004, editorial, said that in selling this nation on the war in Iraq, “the Bush administration convinced a substantial majority of Americans before the war that Saddam Hussein was somehow linked to 9/11 … inexcusably selling the false Iraq-Al Qaeda claim to Americans.” But gentlemen, if this is so, then what? 新的纽约时报 ，在一个2004年6月17日，社论说，在出售这个国家的对伊拉克战争， “布什政府深信，相当多数美国人在战争之前，萨达姆侯赛因是有点联系，以9 / 11 … inexcusably出售虚假伊拉克-盖达组织声称美国人“ ，但，先生们，如果是这样，那么是什么呢？ The New York Times didn’t say, just going on, like everyone else, to the next paragraph, talking about something else. 新的纽约时报并没有说，刚才的事情，和其他人一样，到下段，谈到另一回事。
In a Nov. 15, 2005, editorial, the New York Times said that “the president and his top advisers … did not allow the American people, or even Congress, to have the information necessary to make reasoned judgments of their own.在一个2005年11月15日，社论说， 新的纽约时报说： “总统和他的高级顾问…不容许美国人民，或什至国会，拥有必要的信息以作出理性的判断，他们自己的。 It’s obvious that the Bush administration misled Americans about Mr. Hussein’s weapons and his terrorist connections.” But if it’s “obvious that the Bush administration misled Americans” in taking them to a war that tens of thousands of people have paid for with their lives, now what?很显然，布什政府误导美国人约侯赛因先生的武器和他的恐怖连线“ ，但如果它的”显而易见，布什政府误导美国人“在考虑他们的战争，数以万计的人有支付与他们的生活，现在该怎么做？ No punishment?没有惩罚？ If not, under what theory?如果没有，根据什么理论呢？ Again, you’re just going to go on to the next paragraph?再次，您刚要下去，到下段？
I’m not going to go on to the next unrelated paragraph.我不想去上下一无关的段落。
In early December of 2005, a New York Times-CBS nationwide poll showed that the majority of Americans believed Bush “intentionally misled” the nation to promote a war in Iraq.在十二月初的2005年，一个新的纽约时报-哥伦比亚广播公司在全国范围内民调显示，多数美国人认为布什“故意误导”国家推动在伊拉克的战争。 A Dec. 11, 2005, article in the Los Angeles Times , after citing this national poll, went on to say that because so many Americans believed this, it might be difficult for Bush to get the continuing support of Americans for the war. 1 2005年12月11日，文章在洛杉矶时报后，这个国家的调查中，接着说，因为有很多美国人认为，这一点，可能会有困难，布什得到继续支持的美国人为战争。 In other words, the fact that most Americans believed Bush had deliberately misled them into war was of no consequence in and of itself.在其他的话，事实上，大多数美国人认为，布什故意误导他们陷入战争是没有后果，并且其本身。 Its only consequence was that it might hurt his efforts to get support for the war thereafter.其唯一的后果是，它可能会伤害他的努力获得对伊拉克战争的支持。 So the article was reporting on the effect of the poll findings as if it was reporting on the popularity, or lack thereof, of Bush’s position on global warming or immigration.因此，这篇文章的报告的影响，调查结果如果是关于报告的人气，或缺乏，布什的立场，对全球变暖或入境。 Didn’t the author of the article know that Bush taking the nation to war on a lie (if such be the case) is the equivalent of saying he is responsible for well over 100,000 deaths?没有文章作者都知道，布什以民族战争的谎言（如果这种可能的情况） ，是相当于说，他是负责，以及超过十万人死亡？ One would never know this by reading the article.一，将永远都不会知道这一点，读的文章。
If Bush, in fact, intentionally misled this nation into war, what is the proper punishment for him?如果布什，事实上，是否有意在误导这个国家陷入战争，什么是适当的处罚他？ Since many Americans routinely want criminal defendants to be executed for murdering only one person, if we weren’t speaking of the president of the United States as the defendant here, to discuss anything less than the death penalty for someone responsible for over 100,000 deaths would on its face seem ludicrous.** But we are dealing with the president of the United States here.由于许多美国人经常要刑事被告被处决谋杀只有一人，如果我们不说的是美国总统作为被告在这里，讨论任何少于死刑，有人负责超过十万死亡就其面对的似乎是可笑的** ，但我们正在处理与美国总统在这里。
On the other hand, the intensity of rage against Bush in America has been such (it never came remotely this close with Clinton because, at bottom, there was nothing of any real substance to have any serious rage against him for) that if I heard it once I heard it 10 times that “someone should put a bullet in his head.” That, fortunately, is just loose talk, and even more fortunately not the way we do things in America.在另一方面，强度愤怒，对布什在美国已如（它从来没有来远程关闭，这与克林顿，因为在底部，有没有任何实质有任何严重的愤怒，对他）说，如果我没有听错这一次，我听到它的10倍， “有人要把子弹在他的头部。 ” ，所幸的是，只是松散的对话，更幸运的不是这样，我们的事在美国。 In any event, if an American jury were to find Bush guilty of first-degree murder, it would be up to them to decide what the appropriate punishment should be, one of their options being the imposition of the death penalty.在任何情况下，如果一个美国陪审团是要找出布什承认第一一级谋杀罪，便要由他们去决定什么适当的处罚，应之一，他们的选择被判处死刑。
Although I have never heard before what I am suggesting — that Bush be prosecuted for murder in an American courtroom — many have argued that “Bush should be prosecuted for war crimes” (mostly for the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantanamo) at the International Criminal Court in The Hague, Netherlands.虽然我从来没有听过之前，我的建议-布什被起诉谋杀案，案中一名美国法庭-很多人认为，“布什应该被起诉战争罪” （大多为酷刑的囚犯在阿布格莱布和关塔那摩）在国际刑事法院在荷兰海牙。 But for all intents and purposes this cannot be done.但对于所有意图和目的，这不能这样做。
*Even assuming, at this point, that Bush is criminally responsible for the deaths of over 100,000 people in the Iraq war, under federal law he could only be prosecuted for the deaths of the 4,000 American soldiers killed in the war. *即使假定，在这一点上，布什是刑事责任的死亡负有责任超过十万人在伊拉克战争中，按照美国联邦法律，他只可被检控，为死亡的4000名美军士兵死亡，在战争中。 No American court would have jurisdiction to prosecute him for the one hundred and some thousand Iraqi deaths since these victims not only were not Americans, but they were killed in a foreign nation, Iraq. 没有美国的法院拥有司法管辖权，起诉他为100和一些伊拉克数千人死亡以来，这些受害者不仅没有美国人，但他们被杀害，在外国的国家，伊拉克。 Despite their nationality, if they had been killed here in the States, there would of course be jurisdiction. 尽管他们的国籍，如果他们已被杀害在这里，在美国，将有当然的管辖权。
**Indeed, Bush himself, ironically, would be the last person who would quarrel with the proposition that being guilty of mass murder (even one murder, by his lights) calls for the death penalty as opposed to life imprisonment. **事实上，布什本人，但讽刺的是，将过去的人会吵架，谁与命题，即犯有大规模谋杀（甚至一谋杀，他的灯）呼吁为死刑作为反对判处终身监禁。 As governor of Texas, Bush had the highest execution rate of any governor in American history: He was a very strong proponent of the death penalty who even laughingly mocked a condemned young woman who begged him to spare her life (”Please don’t kill me,” Bush mimicked her in a magazine interview with journalist Tucker Carlson), and even refused to commute the sentence of death down to life imprisonment for a young man who was mentally retarded (although as president he set aside the entire prison sentence of his friend Lewis “Scooter” Libby), and had a broad smile on his face when he announced in his second presidential debate with Al Gore that his state, Texas, was about to execute three convicted murderers.作为总督的得克萨斯州，布什的最高执行率的任何总督在美国历史上：他是一个非常强烈主张死刑谁，甚至笑着嘲笑一年轻女子谴责谁，乞求他备件她的生命（ “请不要杀我， “布什模拟，她在一本杂志采访时问塔克卡尔森） ，甚至拒绝通勤该判处死刑到无期徒刑，一青年男子谁是弱智（虽然作为总统，他拨出整个监狱服刑的他刘易斯的朋友“踏板车”利比） ，并进行了广泛的微笑，对他的脸，当他宣布在他的第二次总统辩论中与戈尔说，他的国家，德克萨斯州，大约是执行三个被定罪的杀人犯。
In Bush’s two terms as Texas governor, he signed death warrants for an incredible 152 out of 153 executions against convicted murderers, the majority of whom killed one person.在布什的两个名词，作为德克萨斯州州长，他签署死刑令，令人难以置信的152出153处决对被定罪的杀人犯，其中大部分是造成一人死亡。 The only death sentence Bush commuted was for one of the many murders that mass murderer Henry Lucas had been convicted of.唯一死刑，布什commuted是其中的许多谋杀案的凶手大规模亨利卢卡斯已被定罪的。 Bush was informed that Lucas had falsely confessed to this particular murder and was innocent, his conviction being improper.布什获悉，卢卡斯曾附有虚假产地来源标签供认，这特别是谋杀和是无辜的，他被定罪不当。 So in 152 out of 152 cases, Bush refused to show mercy even once, finding that not one of the 152 convicted killers should receive life imprisonment instead of the death penalty.因此，在152 152例，布什拒绝开恩，甚至有一次，发现没有一个被定罪的152杀手应接受终身监禁而不是死刑。 Bush’s perfect 100 percent execution rate is highly uncommon even for the most conservative law-and-order governors.布什的完善百分之百的执行率是非常罕见的，即使最保守的法律和秩序的省长。
See More: 看到更多的： Bush 布什 USA News 美国新闻 Warfare 战Have Your Say: The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder 你说：起诉布什谋杀案
Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。
Or discuss this report in our our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的我们的新论坛
One Response to “The Prosecution of George W. Bush for Murder” 1回应“起诉布什谋杀”
Daphne 达芙妮
Posted: May 25th, 2008 at 10:43 pm | 发布时间： 2008年5月25日在下午10时43分| Link to this 链接到本
Free Newsletter 免费通讯 
Related News 相关新闻
- Only 3% of Americans support sending more troops to Iraq只有3 ％的美国人支持派遣更多部队到伊拉克
- Mr Bush, Mandela is still alive布什，曼德拉仍然活着。
- Chavez: Bush, genocidal terrorist查韦斯：布什，种族灭绝的恐怖
- Poll: Americans losing trust in Bush民调：美国人失去的信任布什
- Bush hits new approval rating low布什访问新批准的评价低
Email This Page To A Friend 电子邮件此页给朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新闻标题
- Students Denied Legal Aid学生否认法律援助
- Over 60% of People Do Not Trust the Government超过60 ％的人不信任政府
- Lorry drivers to shut down London roads in protest货车司机关闭伦敦的道路抗议
- Tories pledge to curb use of CCTV cameras保守党承诺，以遏止利用闭路电视摄影机
- Path Intelligence - Phorm for shopping centres?路径情报-p horm商场？
- Concerns grow over snooping watchdog关注成长超过窥探看门狗
- ‘We Are Stuck’ With Guantanamo, Gates Says '我们坚持'与关塔那摩时，盖茨说
- Indictment and Trial of Bush and Cheney起诉和审判布什和切尼
- The War on Drugs - ‘30 Years of Failure’战争的药物-' 30年失败的'
- Indymedia Responds to SHIfT article indymedia回应转移文章
More更多 Breaking News突发新闻
Archive 存档
We must hold the fire to the feet of congress, especially我们必须持有消防向英尺的国会，特别是
the speaker Pelosi, Harry Reid, John Conyers and our议长佩洛西，里德，约翰科尼尔斯和我们
personal representatives.个人代表。 They must not continue their他们绝不能继续他们的
madness carte blanche.疯狂单全权。 This is Aldous Huxley/George Orwell nightmare, “live and in living color”.这是aldous赫胥黎/乔治奥维尔的恶梦， “居住和生活的颜色” 。 The neocons have该新保守主义者有
successful dumbed down enough of us to keep their strategy成功dumbed下来够了我们继续他们的策略
going.流行的。 We must keep writing and talking, educating friends,我们必须保持写作和交谈，教育的朋友，
family and neighbors so that WE MAY BE ABLE TO STOP THE家人和邻居，好让我们可以停止
MADNESS BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE.疯狂之前，这是为时已晚。 Not only our reputation不仅我们的声誉，
and the lives of countless young American men and women,和生命的无数年轻的美国男子和妇女，
but also the lives of innocent Iraqi and Iranian men,而且还无辜者的生命，伊拉克和伊朗的男子，
women and chldren are also at stake every moment that we妇女和chldren也攸关的每一刻，我们
delay.延迟。