RINF.COM : THE BREAKING NEWS ALTERNATIVE rinf.com ：突發新聞的替代 Saturday, June 14th, 2008週六， 2008年6月14日 |  |
Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁 | |
BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞 |
The Heinous Crimes of George W. Bush in 35 Articles of Impeachment犯下的滔天罪行布什在35條，彈劾案 Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 週三， 2008年6月11日 For five hours Congressman Kucinich read clearly and concisely each of the 35 counts against President Bush. 五個小時的國會議員kucinich讀清楚，簡明的每35個計數對美國總統布什。 Occasionally taking sips from a cup, Kucinich didn’t falter, didn’t take a break, and didn’t seem to tire with the long reading, in fact right up to the last article Kucinich, with unwavering passion, said for the 35th time that evening: 偶爾採取sips從一個杯， kucinich沒有猶豫，沒有採取休息，似乎沒有輪胎與長期閱讀，在事實上的權利，直到最後的文章kucinich ，堅定不移地熱情，說，為第三十五時間晚上： “In all of these actions and decisions, President George W. Bush has acted in a manner contrary to his trust as President and Commander in Chief, and subversive of constitutional government, to the prejudice of the cause of law and justice and to the manifest injury of the people of the United States. “在所有這些行動和作出的決定，布什總統已採取行動的方式，相反，他的信任，作為總統和指揮官在行政，顛覆憲法的政府，損害事業的法律和司法以及向艙單受傷的美國人民的。 Wherefore, President George W. Bush, by such conduct, is guilty of an impeachable offense warranting removal from office.” wherefore ，布什總統，這種行為，是犯了罪彈劾值得撤職處分“ 。 These 35 astounding, criminal, impeachable, and in many cases monstrous offenses were spoken out loud for all to hear and watch on CSPAN. So where was the rest of the media, the supposed fourth estate? 這些驚人的35個，刑事，彈劾，而且在許多情況下的滔天罪分別發言，大聲對所有聽到和觀賞於cspan ，所以那裡的其餘部分媒體，假定第四地產？ Where’s the in-depth public reporting on this occasion? 哪裡的，在深入公眾匯報這一次呢？ Where’s Nancy Pelosi who has said all along that impeachment was “off the table” because she had seen no evidence for any criminal wrongdoing by the president and if anyone had such evidence could they “please let her know”. 那裡的佩洛西誰也說，所有沿認為，彈劾案是“關閉表” ，因為她看到了，沒有證據顯示任何刑事不法行為由總統，如果有人有這樣的證據，他們可以“請讓她知道” 。 The evidence was read for the world to hear last night, it is now a matter of public record, and it couldn’t be more obvious that George W. Bush has committed an incredible amount of high crimes and misdemeanors. 證據宣讀了為世界聽到昨晚，這是現在的問題是公開的紀錄，並不能更為明顯，布什已承諾一個不可思議的金額高的罪行和輕罪。 Two Articles That Could be the Undoing of a President 兩篇文章認為，可能是打倒了總統 Let’s focus on 2 key articles presented yesterday. 讓專注於二月關鍵條款在昨天。 Article XIV states : “Misprision of a Felony, Misuse and Exposure of Classified Information And Obstruction of Justice in the Matter of Valerie Plame Wilson, Clandestine Agent of the Central Intelligence Agency.” 第十四條規定 ： “ misprision的一項重罪，濫用和接觸機密資料和妨礙司法公正在這件事的普拉姆（ Valerie衛奕信，秘密代理對中央情報部” 。 Article XVIII states : “ Torture: Secretly Authorizing, and Encouraging the Use of Torture Against Captives in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Other Places, as a Matter of Official Policy.” 第十八條規定 ： “ 酷刑：秘密授權，並鼓勵使用酷刑對俘虜在阿富汗，伊拉克，和其他地方，作為一個問題的官方政策” 。 Above all the other crimes committed by George Bush, these Articles could hold the key to waking up the members of the House Judiciary Committee who have been staunchly following the line of the House Speaker by not pursuing impeachment investigations. 上述的所有其他犯下的罪行是由布什，這些物品可容納的關鍵喚醒成員的眾議院司法委員會的誰已堅決以下線的眾議院議長，由不追求彈劾調查。 Interestingly enough, yesterday just a short time prior to Kucinich making his historic presentation, the House Judiciary Committee, specifically John Conyers (D-Illinois), and Jerrold Nadler (D-New York), officially “invited” Scott McClellan to testify under oath, and be subject to perjury charges should he lie, to be asked about the following matters: 有趣的是，昨天只是一個短期的時間之前kucinich作出了歷史性的介紹，眾院司法委員會，特別是約翰科尼爾斯（四-伊利諾州） ，以及jerrold納德勒（四-紐約） ，正式“邀請”麥克萊倫宣誓作證，並受到偽證罪的收費應他的謊言，要問的關於下列事項： (1) What role did Bush, Cheney and key administration officials take in the effort to reveal the identity of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame Wilson – thus destroying her network and putting lives in jeopardy? （ 1 ）什麼樣的作用沒有布什，切尼和關鍵政府官員採取的努力揭示的身份秘密中央情報局特工普拉姆（ Valerie威爾遜-從而破壞了她的網絡，以及將生命處於危險之中呢？ (2) What role did Bush, Cheney and key administration officials take regarding the firing of US Attorneys for political reasons? （ 2 ）什麼樣的作用沒有布什，切尼和關鍵政府官員採取有關發射美國律師出於政治原因？ (3) What role did Bush, Cheney and key administration officials take in conspiring to blatantly break US and International laws prohibiting the use of torture? （ 3 ）什麼樣的作用沒有布什，切尼和關鍵政府官員採取的陰謀公然打破美國和國際法律，禁止使用酷刑？ Congressman Robert Wexler (D-Florida), a co-sponsor of these articles of impeachment, has been demanding that the Judiciary Committee subpoena McClellan, as well as Rove, Rice and Powell. McClellan’s testimony in conjunction with what this resolution is presenting in Articles XIV and XVII (see background information at 眾議員羅伯特wexler （四-佛羅里達州） ，共同提案國，這些文章的彈劾案，已要求司法委員會的傳票，麥克萊倫，以及羅夫，賴斯和鮑威爾。麥克萊倫的證詞在與什麼這項決議案是介紹在第十四條和第十七條（見背景資料 http://www.wexlerforcongress.com/news.asp?ItemID=255 http://www.wexlerforcongress.com/news.asp?itemid=255 ), could rip open a gaping hole in this administration’s armor that will ultimately result in its destruction. ） ，可擷取打開一個漏洞在這方面政府的盔甲，將最終導致在其銷毀。 Will the media be silent then? Why aren’t these articles of impeachment making their way right now into the public arena to assure that investigations into these articles begin immediately? 將媒體保持沉默，然後，為何沒有這些條款的彈劾案，使他們的權利，現在已經進入公共領域，以確保調查這些物品立即開始呢？ Former president Bill Clinton was investigated and impeached in the House for perjury and obstruction of justice over lying about an illicit sexual affair, and then later was cleared in the Senate of the charges in only 21 days . 美國前總統比爾克林頓被彈劾調查，並在眾議院中，為偽證罪和妨礙司法公正超過倒臥在約一非法性行為的事，和後來被清除了在參議院的各項收費中，只有21天 。 There wasn’ta paper, tabloid, or TV station in this country that didn’t cover every sordid detail of the investigation that led up to those “high crimes and misdemeanors” – what is the explanation for the echoing silence in the face of the astounding and mountainous amount of evidence of the bloody crimes of George W. Bush? 不是有文件，小報，或電視台，在這個國家沒有涵蓋每齷齪詳細的調查，導致了這些“高罪和輕罪” -什麼是解釋為呼應沉默，在面對有關令人驚訝和山區的金額的證據的血腥罪行，喬治W布什？ Why does Bush get a free ride in the media – a media that has so obviously silenced this story, for such heinous crimes as torture, falsely leading a nation to war, rendition, imprisoning children as young as ten years old, spying on American citizens without a warrant, obliterating the Posse Comitatus act, etc. What has changed in the media from non-stop coverage of the impeachment proceedings of a president in 1999, to the resounding silence we hear in 2008? Will our ‘leaders’ in DC take the reading of these charges seriously and begin impeachment hearings now? 為什麼布什獲得免費乘坐在媒體上-傳媒表示，有這麼明顯的沉默的這個故事，這種令人髮指的罪行酷刑，附有虛假產地來源標籤的領導一個民族的戰爭，移交逃犯，監禁歲的孩子十年歲，刺探美國公民沒有逮捕證，抹煞波塞comitatus法，等什麼改變了在媒體上從非一站式的範圍彈劾程序的總統在1999年，以響亮的沉默，我們所聽到的在2008年？將我們的'領導'在直流採取該讀這些指控的嚴重，並開始彈劾聽證會，現在呢？ John Conyers and others have said that impeachment hearings could or would jeopardize Obama’s chances to win in the November election and therefore an election win is of far more importance than protecting the rule of law and bringing those who’ve committed unprecedented and historical harm to our nation and the world to justice. 約翰科尼爾斯等人說，彈劾案聽證會或將危及奧巴馬的機會，爭取在2004年11月選舉產生，因此，大選中獲勝，是深遠的，更重要的比保護的法治，並將那些誰已經承諾了前所未有的和歷史的危害我們的國家和世界繩之於法。 It is now up to the people of conscience to not let the historical significance of June 9, 2008 go unheard and unacknowledged! 現在是向人民的良心，不要讓歷史意義， 2008年6月9日去聞所未聞的和承認的！ We must openly and publicly thank Kucinich, and Wexler, for their courage and for bravely and succinctly putting forth all the crimes of George W. Bush. We must take it upon ourselves to hound and haunt Conyers and Nadler to listen to us. 我們必須公開，並公開感謝kucinich ， wexler ，為他們的勇氣和勇敢和簡潔地提出了所有的罪行，喬治W布什，我們必須採取它自己，以獵犬和困擾科尼爾斯和納德勒聽我們。 The people must do their utmost to spread this information as quickly as possible to everyone they know. Contact the media and hold them accountable for their silence and complicity in the face of the enormous evidence of the high crimes and misdemeanors committed on such a massive scale by the Bush regime. We must, in our millions, demand that the time for impeachment is long overdue. 人民必須盡最大努力傳播這方面的資料，盡快向他們每個人都知道。接觸媒體和追究他們的責任他們的沉默和共謀，在面對巨大的證據，高罪和輕罪致力於在這樣一個大規模的由布什政權，我們必須在我們的幾百萬，要求的時間，克林頓彈劾案是早該。 We must make a firm commitment to Drive Out the Bush Regime, because we and the world really can’t wait. 我們必須作出堅定的承諾，推動了布什政權，因為我們和世界真的不能再等下去了。 (for more information see （如需了解更多資訊，請參閱 www.worldcantwait.org www.worldcantwait.org ) ） See More: 看到更多的： Bush 布什 USA News 美國新聞Have Your Say: The Heinous Crimes of George W. Bush in 35 Articles of Impeachment 你說：滔天罪行，布什在35條，彈劾案 Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。 Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇 2 Responses to “The Heinous Crimes of George W. Bush in 35 Articles of Impeachment” 2反應“的滔天罪行，布什在35條彈劾”
| Translations 翻譯               Free Newsletter 免費通訊 Related News 相關新聞
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友 Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞 Archive 存檔
|
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員 |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 所表達的意見，在rinf新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者（ S ）和並不一定反映的意見，網站管理員。 RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. rinf.com ：突破新聞與其他的媒體是copyleft的-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇 |
This entire situation is really quite simple.這整個情況，實在是相當簡單。 If there is ONE article of impeachment, that is enough to impeach.如果有一篇文章的彈劾案，這是不夠的彈劾。 The fact that there are multiple articles of impeachment for both Cheney and Bush tells you that there really is no other choice BUT to impeach…except when you consider the fact that, by impeachment, it may force their hands into launching a war against Iran, which would then directly institute martial law, which in turn would cancel the November elections.事實上，有多篇文章，彈劾都切尼和布什告訴你，真的是沒有其他選擇，只能彈劾…除了當你考慮到一個事實，即由彈劾，它可能會迫使他們手中，成為發動戰爭對伊朗，這便直接研究所戒嚴，這反過來將取消11月的選舉。
While the US is under martial law, there will be no new president.而美國是根據戒嚴法，將不會有任何新總統。
The fact is that, no matter which way you add it up, it’sa no win situation for the US Citizens, and for the world.事實是，無論使用哪種方式添加它，這是沒有雙贏的局面，為美國公民，並且為世界。 Either way the problem is attacked, we get far more than an “equal and opposite reaction” to the choice to do what’s right for the world.無論哪種方式的問題是攻擊，我們得到遠遠多於“平等和相反的反應” ，選擇做什麼的權利，為世界。
Who makes the call may well end up making the call on the survival of the entire planet.誰使調用可能，以及最終作出的呼籲，對生存的整個地球。