|
|
Vertaal:
              Het Thaise hof verwerpt de overheid
Woensdag, 3 December, 2008
Door Peter Symonds | In een hoogst politiek besluit, ontsloeg het Constitutionele Hof van Thailand gisteren effectief de overheid door de beslissende Partij van de Macht van Mensen (PPP) en twee van zijn coalitiepartners op te lossen. Anti-government protesten die twee belangrijke luchthavens van Bangkok voor een week verlamden zijn afgelast, maar de voortgezette politieke crisis van het land is verre van over. ? Het hof besliste eenstemmig dat PPP, de Grafiek Thai en Matchima Thipataya aan kiesfraude in de nationale verkiezing van laatste December zich schuldig maakten. De eerste Minister Somchai Wongsawat kondigde aan dat hij - neer zou stappen nadat het hof hem en 108 uitvoerende leden en ambtenaren van de drie partijen van politiek vijf jaar verbood. Verdedigers van de overheid, die gisteren buiten het hof protesteerden, veroordeelden het besluit als „staatsgreep in vermomming“ en „gerechtelijke staatsgreep“. Het is de tweede keer in drie maanden dat het Constitutionele Hof de overheid heeft verdrongen. In September, beslisten de rechters dat de Eerste Minister Samak Samaravej, ook van PPP, de grondwet door een klein honorarium voor zijn verschijningen te blijven ontvangen op het long-running koken toont op commerciële TV had overtreden. In Mei 2007, loste het hof de PPP voorloper, Thaise Rak Thai (TRT) op, en legde een politiek verbod aan vroegere Eerste Minister Thaksin Shinawatra en 110 hogere ambtenaren TRT op. ? Yesterday hofbesluit is een andere demonstratie van de politisering van de volledige Thaise staat amid een bittere, voortgezette confrontatie tussen twee facties van de beslissende elite van het land. Voor maanden, is de Alliantie van Volkeren voor de demonstratiesystemen van de Democratie (PAD) toegestaan om de samenstelling van het Huis van de Overheid in centraal Bangkok te bezetten. Geen actie werd gevoerd door het leger, de politie of de hoven na de gegrepen internationale controle van PAD protesters van Suvarnabhumi van Bangkok en aantrekt binnenlandse luchthavens Muang die, tot 250.000 toeristen en reizigers vastlopen. In plaats daarvan, kwam het Constitutionele Hof ongebruikelijke haast samen om de overheid voor kiesfraude te ontslaan? een praktijk waarvoor alle Thaise partijen bekend zijn. ? Terwijl de uitspraak van het Hof de directe crisis heeft bezworen, blijft het politieke afstand houden. PPP de leiders hebben de gelofte gedaan om een nieuwe overheid te vormen door hun partij onder een nieuwe naam opnieuw te vormen? Puea Thai (Partij voor Thais)? en kiezend een nieuwe eerste minister. Alhoewel zowat 24 PPP parlementariërs, met inbegrip van 13 kabinetsleden, zullen worden gedwongen om als resultaat van het hofverbod af te treden, anders genoemde zullen PPP en zijn bondgenoten nog een duidelijke parlementaire meerderheid hebben. Somchai’s deputy, Chavarat Charnvirakul, has taken over as acting prime minister and parliament is being convened on December 8 to install a new government. ? Such an outcome will not satisfy PAD or its backers in the military, the monarchy, courts and state bureaucracy. In ending the airport occupations yesterday, PAD leader and media mogul Sondhi Limthongkul warned: “If a puppet government returns or a new government shows insincerity in pushing for political reform, we will return.” Although protest numbers have been dwindling as the confrontation has become more violent, PAD is still capable of mobilising thousands of largely urban middle class supporters. ? Sondhi launched the PAD protests against the Thaksin government in late 2005, precipitating a constitutional crisis that led to an army coup in September 2006. The military junta called fresh elections under a revamped constitution last December, expecting that the pro-Thaksin PPP would be sidelined, but the opposite took place. PAD restarted its protests in May denouncing first Samak, then Somchai, as a “puppet” of Thaksin, who is currently in exile. ? PAD spokesmen bitterly criticise Thaksin and the PPP-led government for corruption, treason and disrespect for the monarchy. However, Sondhi and other PAD leaders publicly backed Thaksin and his TRT when he first came to power in 2001. Sections of Thai business supported Thaksin as a means of ending the IMF-backed restructuring measures implemented by the Democrat Party-led government following the 1997-98 Asian financial crisis. ? Having come to power, however, Thaksin alienated many of his establishment supporters by continuing to open Thailand up to foreign investors. Sections of the military and state bureaucracy were resentful that Thaksin was undermining their traditional prerogatives and associated payoffs. Layers of small and medium business in Bangkok complained at the failure of the government to protect them from international competition. These elements formed the core of a rather heterogeneous movement that also roped in those angered by Thaksin’s autocratic methods and the impact of his policies on jobs and living standards. ? There is nothing remotely progressive, however, in PAD’s agenda. Its “new politics” directly expresses the interests of the traditional Thai elites that have ruled the country for much of the past 80 years through military dictatorships. PAD leaders brand the many rural voters who supported the TRT, then the PPP, as ignorant and uneducated and call for 70 percent of the national assembly to be appointed. PAD has no political party of its own and has an uneasy relationship with the opposition Democrats. The main aim of PAD’s occupations has been to provide a pretext for the army or the state apparatus to directly intervene. ? There is no guarantee that the PPP will be allowed to re-label itself and form a new government next week. The Constitutional Court ruling opens the door for further moves by the state apparatus against the government. Asia Times correspondent Shawn Crispin pointed out that the Election Commission might now intervene to overturn the December 2007 results. “The half-appointed Senate as well as the Privy Council [of the king] could potentially play appointment roles in such a scenario, one political analyst suggests. It’s also still possible that the military will move to forcefully fill the political gap through an appointed body, especially if Tuesday’s court decision leads to more street violence.” ? The ongoing political crisis, compounded by the impact of the global economic recession, is having a devastating impact on the Thai economy. Finance Minister Suchart Thada Thamrongvech told Reuters on Monday that the economy would grow next year by at most 1-2 percent, down from earlier forecasts of 4-5 percent. International credit rating agencies Standard & Poors and Fitch downgraded their outlook for Thailand from “stable” to “negative” on Monday. Fitch Rating predicted a growth rate of 0.9 percent for 2009. ? Thai business groups have cautiously welcomed the court decision as a means of ending the crisis. Thai Chamber of Commerce chairman Pramon Sutivong told the Nation that the “private sector wants all conflicts to end soon and expects PAD to come to its senses now that the government has been unseated”. Layers of big business have in the past supported the PPP government as a means of further opening up the Thai economy and encouraging foreign investment. ? The international press has been increasingly critical of PAD and its backers for throwing the country into chaos and undermining the “democratically elected” government. An exasperated article in the British-based Times, for instance, declared that an entire country had been “held to ransom by a few thousand middle-class zealots” demonstrating “the alarming transformation” of Thailand into “a place where effective democratic politics has almost ceased to function”. ? Other articles paint the ruling PPP as a bastion of democracy and a defender of the “rural poor” against the middle classes and privileged elites of Bangkok. The PPP, however, is no more concerned with the democratic rights and living standards of the rural masses than PAD represents the interests of the bulk of the middle classes in Bangkok. While offering limited handouts to rural areas, Thaksin, one of Thailand’s wealthiest businessmen, was notorious for his repressive, anti-democratic methods while in office. Both the pro- and anti-government camps are funded by wealthy backers and represent competing right-wing factions of the ruling elite. ? The temporary lull in tensions is likely to be short-lived as the government and its opponents manoeuvre behind the scenes prior to the convening of parliament next week to select a new prime minister. Have Your Say: Thai court dismisses the government Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Military chiefs urge raid inside Pakistan Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:17 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
you tube pulling a lot of conspiracy vids. Last post by maasanova @ 12:10 AM FEMA sources confirm coming martial law Last post by Nostalgia @ 12:03 AM Business ISP blunders on BNP list Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:57 PM Berlusconi plans to use G8 presidency to 'regulate the internet' Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:50 PM Faced With Water Shortages, The World Bank insist upon Privatisation Of Water Last post by Nostalgia @ 11:21 PM NWO distraction Last post by Unregistered @ 11:06 PM HEY HUMAN! - YES you! - You do not have to be livestock - SO WAKE UP! Last post by Unregistered @ 10:43 PM Prophetic Signs that we are in the End Times Last post by Knight of the Word @ 09:35 PM There's gold in green: profiting from climate change Last post by Nostalgia @ 09:20 PM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More World News  Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
