2 Responses to “Ron Paul Will Fight On”

1. inovasphere Posted: Feb 10th, 2008 at 7:22 pm

   It is something how it has come down to three — Ron, Huckabee, and McLamer if the democrats are dumb enough to nominate hillary, this will energize the ‘i hate the clintons’ voters, and could be decisive for McLamer but McLamer is soooo lame, all his talk about eternal wars (translation D-R-A-F-T) i am *guessing* is very unpopular, esp considering that america has not received a single dividend from all the warring so far — unless you consider pay $3+ for gas, and dead sons and daughters a dividend, not to mention all the rampant inflation the war debt has created through every sector of the economy, which *you* *pay* for. McLamer looks bad, and sounds bad. he is mentally not al there, i think he has a little dementia going on. maybe something to do with his time as a pow, hard to say at any rate, despite the fact that thee is a massive hate the clinton contingent out there, who’ll vote for satan rather than se hillary and bill back in the white house, McLame, is so lame that it is very likely even he could not beat hillary based on the hate the clinton vote. now, obama, on the other hand, could *easily* wipe out any republican candidate. but obama is not a manchurian, a ‘chosen’ one. hillary and mcLame are the chosen ones, because they represent two sides of the status quo, which at root is to, by all and any means, no matter how nefarious, keep the prop in the equities markets (RE and stocks) mcLame will make war with iran first thing, and congress will appropriate fresh billions, which will then (like all the other war appropriations in the last 7 years) be spread out to intermediaries to prop the index funds, and then a whopping batch will be dumped into treasuries, which will plunge long term rates again, and make RE prices go up. hillary says she is anti-war, but nobody can believe that. either way, with the clinton gang back in power, they’ll load up all their moral hazard crew in every govt post, none of who will even blink to do whatever they want, the first order of business is to once again use the treasury like a giant hedge fund to bail out the stock market. this is why it should come as no surprise that the chosen ones are hillary and mcLamer, because one way or the other, the elite scumbags who definitely do *not* want to see and equity collapse, get what they want. now, the elite scumbags don’t really care about prices going down. theoretically they could buy america for pennies on the d0llar if they let the markets alone, and they crashed on their own, etc. however, the politics of that are very bad. after all, were we not sold that we *needed* the federal reserve system to ‘protect’ us from things like that? the federal reserve system is the cow the fed govt milks day and night to get its easy funding for all of its grotesque expansionism. and what have we seen since bush got into the WH but the greatest expansion of *any* govt in world history. so much for the republican party being a limited govt party. haha, what a laugh. you can imagine the revolt in the country if there was a crash in equities. the easy conclusion would be, ‘well, if the federal reserve system could not prevent it, what is the point of having it in the first place?’ and then of course, when people get a little smarter, they’ll realize the federal reserve system was the enabler of the scenario that was the predicate for the crash, viz all the wasted debt for empty useless wars fighting enemies that do not exist, etc etc etc so the revelation of what a totally crooked scheme the federal reserve system has been, for the last nearly 100 years, will come full force in the face of most americans, who will, in the ashes of the disaster, work to find a way to move back to real money, and forever ban fiat central banking. we must remember that the federal reserve system was created by a legislative act of congress. it can be un-created just as easily. to the good folks at the fed govt, there goes their cash cow, and to the good folks at the fed there goes all the power associated with the creation and control of money. these are *serious* motivators for people who control the game to do whatever it takes to keep the game going just the way they like it. but if somebody becomes the president who is *not* a team player, then the risk to the monetary system, and all of its ‘benefits’ to the status quo elite who control it all, become very real. they don’t want to buy a low price, they want to make sure the prices do not deflate, because at this stage, the risk of a dramatic price deflation, and a sudden one, is very real. after all, was it not just a week ago or so that over night the DOW lost 700 points. *down* 700 points *at the open*! i’ve never seen a gap that big as long as i have been trading. that was a *very* big deal. but the boys showed up to shove the prices higher so ‘everybody’ would think things are ok, etc. well, anyway, it is very dangerous to have a manchurian in the WH. i still think that the humpty dumpty crew wont be able to hold on to their equity market, and so plan B is to ‘manage’ the disaster by very heavy handed govt policy/regs, etc. cant even imagine what they’ll come up with but it will not be pleasant. otoh, a non-manchurian, like ron paul (i suppose even huckabee) and obama, in the likely event the wheels totally came off the wheels (as they should) in the equity markets, they are not the types to go pedal to the metal police state to deal with the ‘emergency’ the *real* problem is the fed govt and the fed reserve have *created* this problem, and it all started way back in 1987 with the first stock market bail out. at any rate, if the republicans really wanted to win in 2008, they’d stop screwing around and put their best candidate in front — Ron Paul, because he could easily beat obama and hillary put together. ron appeals to the conservative, he’s fiscally solid in his outlook, and he is anti-unconstitutional war. as a bonus, he is anti federal reserve, anti-IRS and anti-income tax. ah, would it not be sweet to get rid of the IRS and the income tax!!!! but the income tax pays for the interest on all the debt the federal reserve bankers create, so you can imagine they are very motivated *not* to have anybody become the resident who will destroy the great destroyer of liberty — the IRS and income tax. it we are the land of the free? hahahahahahaha Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this

2. inovasphere Posted: Feb 10th, 2008 at 7:25 pm

   correction: now, obama, on the other hand, could *easily* wipe out any republican candidate — except Ron Reply | Quote selected text | Link to this