RINF.COM: 最新新聞選擇
星期五， 2008年7月25日
RINF.COM: 最新新聞選擇
|
|
最新新聞 |
米認為伊朗不嚴肅在週末核武器談話
星期二， 2008年7月22日 談論這個報告在RINF論壇 > 在星期一國務卿Condoleezza Rice被指責的伊朗是嚴肅的在週末談論它的爭執的核項目儘管資深美國的出現。 外交官和警告它也許很快面對新的認可。 在她的第一公眾從星期六的會議在瑞士評論，米認為伊朗給了躲閃使節從美國。 并且其他五個世界大國。 她說全部六個國家對一個兩星期最後期限伊朗是嚴肅的必須現在讚成結冰嫌疑犯活動和開始交涉或被擊中以新的懲罰。 米在會議簡報了由國務院的沒有。 3外交官，在國務卿之下為政治事務威廉燒，在一個轉移出席會議從華盛頓的早先堅持它不會遇見伊朗，除非鈾的充實停止了。 米在阿布紮比星期一在談話到達了并且是從燒傷得到一份面對面的簡報。 兩個是然後談論伊朗和其他問題在秘密會議與外交部長和高級官員從六個海灣阿拉伯國家與埃及、伊拉克和喬丹一起。 與美國和以色列一起，主要遜尼派教徒回教海灣阿拉伯人對多數人什葉派教徒・肌肉屈曲在這個區域的伊朗的是越來越機警的。 同時，世界油價在$130之上在關心上升了每桶新的制裁伊朗威脅在中東也許升級緊張。 在星期六的會議上，伊朗預計反應刺激包裹被提供以交換鈾的制止的充實，可以用於給原子武器加油。 布什政府打破以耐久政策送一位高級外交官支持提議。 然而，米認為那而不是一個連貫答復，伊朗的首要核談判員Saeed Jalili在日內瓦提供了一個「蜿蜒地流的」獨白毫不相關「小充分談論文化」看上去使其他的許多人困惱當前在桌。 「我們準備聽見一個答復從伊朗，但，和案件許多次與伊朗，什麼通過不是嚴肅的」，米告訴記者她的飛機，當她飛行到阿拉伯聯合酋長國。 “It’s time for the Iranians to give a serious answer.” “They can’t go and stall and make small talk about culture, they have to make a decision,” she said. “People are tired of the Iranians and their stalling tactics.” Rice’s remarks about the Iranian presentation were much harsher than those of the host of the meeting, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who lamented only that Iran had not provided “all the answers to the questions.” The Iran nuclear question is expected to top the agenda at a gathering of European Union foreign ministers on Tuesday in Brussels, officials said. On Sunday, Iranian state radio reported that President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad called the talks a “step ahead” and said country’s formal assessment would be issued soon. On Saturday, one member of the Iranian delegation said there was “no chance” Iran would suspend uranium enrichment, again denying assertions that Iran’s nuclear program was for anything other than power production. Jalili avoided the suspension issue entirely. Unless Iran responds positively in the next two weeks, it can expect more sanctions to be imposed by the United States and the European Union as early as late August or September and may then be hit with a fourth sanctions resolution at the U.N. Security Council, Rice said. “We will see what Iran does in two weeks, but I think the diplomatic process now has a new kind of energy to it,” she said. “If they do not decide to suspend then we will be in a situation where we have to return to the Security Council.” High-level contact between the United States and Iran is extremely rare and Burns’ presence at the talks may have confused the Iranians, Rice said, acknowledging a tactical change to demonstrate U.S. unity with the other five powers: Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia. “From time to time, it is important to invigorate the diplomacy,” she said. “I think that the fact that we went may have been a bit surprising to the Iranians, and they didn’t react in a way that gave anyone any confidence.” The offer envisions a six-week commitment from Iran to stop expanding enrichment, during which time no additional sanctions would be imposed. That is intended to create the framework for formal negotiations that, it is hoped, will lead to a permanent halt of enrichment. Rice was dismissive when asked if Burns or another U.S. diplomat would be present to hear Iran’s response in two weeks. “I think we’ve done enough to demonstrate that the United States is serious and to assure our partners that we’re serious,” she said. Discuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: Rice says Iran not serious at weekend nuke talks One Response to “Rice says Iran not serious at weekend nuke talks”
|
Translations             
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
No Condi, people aren’t ‘tired of the Iranians and their stalling tactics’, they’re getting increasingly tired with US hegemony, lies, half-truths and warmongering! Hands off Iran you war pig (and while you’re at it, get out of Iraq and Afghanistan and apologise for all the civilians you’ve killed as you leave!). You could also think about not interfering in Venezuela and Bolivia any further, they want your democracy about as much as the Iraqi insurgents (at least you haven’t stooped so low as to call the insurgents terrorists yet).
Here’s a thought for you, why don’t you try and sort your own country’s problems before ‘helping’ others. The raging poverty, the underclass that you’ve created of mostly african americans, the exploding prison population, the unforgiving rampant capitalism (profit over *everything*), the shrinking civil liberties and the raping of your constitution. It reminds me of the verse in the Bible, you know the one about removing the plank from your own eye!