RINF.COM: A ALTERNATIVA QUEBRANDO DA NOTÍCIA
Sexta-feira, julho 25o, 2008
RINF.COM: A ALTERNATIVA QUEBRANDO DA NOTÍCIA
|
|
QUEBRANDO A NOTÍCIA |
O arroz diz Irã nao sério em conversas do nuke do fim de semana
Terça-feira, julho 22o, 2008 Discuta este relatório nos forums de RINF > A secretária de estado Irã acusado Condoleezza Rice em segunda-feira de não ser séria no fim de semana fala sobre seu programa nuclear disputado apesar da presença de uns ESTADOS UNIDOS sênior. o diplomata, e advertido lhe pode logo enfrentar sanctions novos. Em seu primeiro público comenta desde a reunião de sábado em Switzerland, Irã dito arroz tinha dado o run-around aos envoys dos ESTADOS UNIDOS. e outros cinco poders do mundo. Dita todas as seis nações era séria sobre um fim do prazo two-week Irã agora tem que concordar às atividades do suspeito do freeze e começar negociações ou ser batida com penalidades novas. O arroz foi instruído na reunião pelo no. do departamento do estado. diplomata 3, sob a secretária de estado para os casos políticos William Burns, que atenderam à sessão em um deslocamento do insistence precedente de Washington que não se encontraria com os Iranians a menos que o enriquecimento do urânio parasse. O arroz chegou em Abu Dhabi segunda-feira e foi começar uma instrução face-to-face nas conversas das queimaduras. Ambos eram então discutir Irã e outras edições em reuniões da closed-porta com os ministros extrangeiros e os oficiais sênior de seis estados árabes do golfo junto com Egipto, Iraq e Jordão. Junto com os Estados Unidos e a Israel, principalmente os árabes muçulmanos do golfo de Sunni são cada vez mais wary da maioria Shiite Irã queflexiona na região. Entrementes, os preços de óleo do mundo levantaram-se acima de $130 um o tambor em interesses que a ameaça de sanctions novos de encontro a Irã pode escalar tensões em o Oriente Médio. Na reunião de sábado, Irã tinha-se esperado responder a um pacote dos incentives oferecidos na troca para o enriquecimento parando do urânio, que pode ser usado abastecer armas atômicas. A administração de Bush quebrou com política long-standing para emitir um diplomata superior para suportar a oferta. Entretanto, o arroz disse aquele em vez de uma resposta coherent, negotiator nuclear principal Saeed Jalili de Irã entregou um monologue “meandering” completamente “da conversa pequena irrelevant sobre a cultura” que pareceu irritar muita do outras se apresenta na tabela em Genebra. “Nós esperamos ouvir uma resposta dos Iranians mas, como foi o caso assim muitas vezes com os Iranians, de o que veio completamente não eram sérios,” os repórteres ditos arroz a bordo de seu plano porque voou aos Emirates árabes unidos. “It’s time for the Iranians to give a serious answer.” “They can’t go and stall and make small talk about culture, they have to make a decision,” she said. “People are tired of the Iranians and their stalling tactics.” Rice’s remarks about the Iranian presentation were much harsher than those of the host of the meeting, European Union foreign policy chief Javier Solana, who lamented only that Iran had not provided “all the answers to the questions.” The Iran nuclear question is expected to top the agenda at a gathering of European Union foreign ministers on Tuesday in Brussels, officials said. On Sunday, Iranian state radio reported that President Mahmoud Ahmadenijad called the talks a “step ahead” and said country’s formal assessment would be issued soon. On Saturday, one member of the Iranian delegation said there was “no chance” Iran would suspend uranium enrichment, again denying assertions that Iran’s nuclear program was for anything other than power production. Jalili avoided the suspension issue entirely. Unless Iran responds positively in the next two weeks, it can expect more sanctions to be imposed by the United States and the European Union as early as late August or September and may then be hit with a fourth sanctions resolution at the U.N. Security Council, Rice said. “We will see what Iran does in two weeks, but I think the diplomatic process now has a new kind of energy to it,” she said. “If they do not decide to suspend then we will be in a situation where we have to return to the Security Council.” High-level contact between the United States and Iran is extremely rare and Burns’ presence at the talks may have confused the Iranians, Rice said, acknowledging a tactical change to demonstrate U.S. unity with the other five powers: Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia. “From time to time, it is important to invigorate the diplomacy,” she said. “I think that the fact that we went may have been a bit surprising to the Iranians, and they didn’t react in a way that gave anyone any confidence.” The offer envisions a six-week commitment from Iran to stop expanding enrichment, during which time no additional sanctions would be imposed. That is intended to create the framework for formal negotiations that, it is hoped, will lead to a permanent halt of enrichment. Rice was dismissive when asked if Burns or another U.S. diplomat would be present to hear Iran’s response in two weeks. “I think we’ve done enough to demonstrate that the United States is serious and to assure our partners that we’re serious,” she said. Discuss this report in the RINF forums > Have Your Say: Rice says Iran not serious at weekend nuke talks One Response to “Rice says Iran not serious at weekend nuke talks”
|
Translations             
Free Newsletter
Related News
Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News Archive |
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
No Condi, people aren’t ‘tired of the Iranians and their stalling tactics’, they’re getting increasingly tired with US hegemony, lies, half-truths and warmongering! Hands off Iran you war pig (and while you’re at it, get out of Iraq and Afghanistan and apologise for all the civilians you’ve killed as you leave!). You could also think about not interfering in Venezuela and Bolivia any further, they want your democracy about as much as the Iraqi insurgents (at least you haven’t stooped so low as to call the insurgents terrorists yet).
Here’s a thought for you, why don’t you try and sort your own country’s problems before ‘helping’ others. The raging poverty, the underclass that you’ve created of mostly african americans, the exploding prison population, the unforgiving rampant capitalism (profit over *everything*), the shrinking civil liberties and the raping of your constitution. It reminds me of the verse in the Bible, you know the one about removing the plank from your own eye!