New Guidelines Would Give FBI Broader Powers新準則將給予聯邦調查局更廣泛的權力，
By通過 ERIC LICHTBLAU 埃里克利希特布勞 | A Justice Department plan would loosen restrictions on the |司法部計劃將放寬限制，對 Federal Bureau of Investigation 聯邦調查局 to allow agents to open a national security or criminal investigation against someone without any clear basis for suspicion, Democratic lawmakers briefed on the details said Wednesday.讓代理商開放的國家安全或刑事調查對有人沒有任何明確的基礎上的懷疑，民主黨議員，聽取有關詳情說，週三。
The plan, which could be made public next month, has already generated intense interest and speculation.該計劃，這可能予以公開下個月，已經產生了濃厚的興趣和猜測。 Little is known about its precise language, but civil liberties advocates say they fear it could give the government even broader license to open terrorism investigations.所知甚少，其精確的語言，但公民自由的倡導者說，他們擔心它可能讓政府更廣泛的授權，以開放的恐怖主義調查。
Congressional staff members got a glimpse of some of the details in closed briefings this month, and four Democratic senators told Attorney General國會助理人員得到一瞥的一些細節在非公開的簡報，這一個月， 4民主黨參議員說，總檢察長 Michael B. Mukasey 邁克爾乙mukasey in a letter on Wednesday that they were troubled by what they heard.在信中對週三，他們所困擾，他們聽到。
The senators said the new guidelines would allow the FBI to open an investigation of an American, conduct surveillance, pry into private records and take other investigative steps “without any basis for suspicion.” The plan “might permit an innocent American to be subjected to such intrusive surveillance based in part on race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, or on protected First Amendment activities,” the letter said.參議員說，新準則將允許美國聯邦調查局公開的調查，一名美國人，進行監視，窺探到私人記錄，並採取其他調查步驟“毫無根據的懷疑” 。計劃“可能會允許一個無辜的美國人受到這種侵入式監視部分是基於種族，民族血統，宗教，或對第一修正案的保護活動“ ，信中說。 It was signed by這是簽署 Russ Feingold 儒法因戈爾德 of Wisconsin,威斯康星州， Richard J. Durbin 理查德德賓j. of Illinois,伊利諾州， Edward M. Kennedy 愛德華肯尼迪 of Massachusetts and Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island.馬薩諸塞州懷特豪斯謝爾頓和羅得島。
As the end of the Bush administration nears, the White House has been seeking to formalize in law and regulation some of the aggressive counterterrorism steps it has already taken in practice since the Sept. 11 attacks.作為年底，布什政府的臨近，白宮一直在尋求正式的法律和規例的一些咄咄逼人的反恐步驟，它已經在實踐中採取了自9月11日的襲擊。
Congress overhauled the federal wiretapping law in July, for instance, and President Bush issued an executive order this month ratifying new roles for intelligence agencies.國會全面聯邦竊聽法今年7月，舉例來說，與美國總統布什發出的行政命令，這一個月批准的新角色為情報機構。 Other pending changes would also authorize greater sharing of intelligence information with the local police, a major push in the last seven years.其他未決的變化，也將授權更多地分享情報與當地警察的一個主要推動，在過去七年。
The Justice Department is already expecting criticism over the FBI guidelines.美國司法部已經超過預期的批評，美國聯邦調查局的指引。 In an effort to pre-empt critics, Mr. Mukasey gave a speech last week in Portland, Ore., describing the unfinished plan as an effort to “integrate more completely and harmonize the standards that apply to the FBI’s activities.” Differing standards, he said, have caused confusion for field agents.在努力先發製人的批評，先生mukasey發表演講，介紹了上週在俄勒岡州的波特蘭，描述未完成的計劃，作為一項努力“整合更完整和統一的標準，適用於聯邦調查局的活動。 ”不同標準，他說，造成混亂，為外地代理商。
Mr. Mukasey emphasized that the FBI would still need a “valid purpose” for an investigation, and that it could not be “simply based on somebody’s race, religion, or exercise of First Amendment rights.” mukasey先生強調說，聯邦調查局將仍然需要一個“有效的目的”的調查，而且它不能“只是基於對某人的種族，宗教或行使第一修正案的權利” 。
Rather than expanding government power, he said, “this document clarifies the rules by which the FBI conducts its intelligence mission.”而不是擴大政府的權力，他說： “這份文件闡明的規則，其中美國聯邦調查局進行的情報任務” 。
In 2002,在2002年， John Ashcroft 約翰阿什克羅夫特 , then the attorney general, allowed FBI agents to visit public sites like mosques or monitor Web sites in the course of national security investigations. ，然後總檢察長，允許聯邦調查局特工前往公共場所一樣，清真寺或監察網站，在這個過程中國家安全調查。 The next year, Mr. Bush issued guidelines allowing officials to use ethnicity or race in “narrow” circumstances to detect a terrorist threat.明年，布什先生發出指引，允許官員使用種族或種族在“狹窄”的情況下檢測到的恐怖威脅。
The Democratic senators said the draft plan appeared to allow the FBI to go even further in collecting information on Americans connected to “foreign intelligence” without any factual predicate.民主黨參議員說，計劃草案的出現，讓美國聯邦調查局去，甚至進一步在蒐集資料，對美國人連接到“外國情報機構”沒有任何事實的前提。 They also said there appeared to be few constraints on how the information would be shared with other agencies.他們還表示有似乎是數的限制，就如何將信息共享與其他機構。
Michael German, a lawyer with the邁克爾德語，律師與 American Civil Liberties Union 美國公民自由聯盟 and a former FBI agent, said the plan appeared to open the door still further to the use of data-mining profiles in tracking terrorism.和一名前聯邦調查局特工說，這一計劃似乎是敞開大門仍然進一步利用數據挖掘配置文件的追踪恐怖主義。
“This seems to be based on the idea that the government can take a bunch of data and create a profile that can be used to identify future bad guys,” he said. “這似乎是基於設想，即政府可以採取一系列的數據和創建一個配置文件，可以用來確定今後的壞人， ”他說。 “But that has not been demonstrated to be true anywhere else.” “但並沒有得到證明是真實的地方” 。
The Justice Department said Wednesday that in light of requests from members of Congress for more information, Mr. Mukasey would agree not to sign the new guidelines before a Sept. 17 Congressional hearing.司法部說，週三，在輕的要求，國會議員，如需詳細資訊，先生mukasey會同意，不簽署新的指導方針之前， 9月17日的國會聽證會。
Have Your Say: New Guidelines Would Give FBI Broader Powers 你說：新準則將給予聯邦調查局更廣泛的權力，
Please read our請閱讀我們的 posting guidelines before posting發布指引，然後再發布 . 。
Alternatively或者 you can discuss this report here您可以討論此報告在這裡 . 。
One Response to “New Guidelines Would Give FBI Broader Powers” 1回應“新準則將給予聯邦調查局更廣泛的權力”
Arnold 阿諾德
Posted: Aug 22nd, 2008 at 4:18 am 發布時間： 2008年8月22日在上午04時18分
Translations 翻譯
Related News 相關新聞
- Mukasey Refuses to Probe CIA Interrogations mukasey拒絕探針中央情報局的盤問
- CIA not authorised to use waterboarding中情局沒有授權使用waterboarding
- AG Denies Details in CIA Tapes Inquiry銀否認細節，在美國中央情報局的錄音帶調查
- CIA to yield to criminal probe中情局產量刑事探針
- Mukasey Confirmed as Bush’s Third Attorney General mukasey證實，布什的第三次總檢察長
Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題
- McCain Office Mailed Threat, White Powder麥凱恩辦公室郵寄威脅，白色粉末
- Wasted Food Is Also Wasted Water浪費食物，也是浪費水
- Man Selling Anti-War Shirts Wins Ruling男子出售反戰襯衫贏得執政
- UK court rules against gov’t in key Guantanamo case英國法院規則對官立在關鍵關塔那摩案件
- Planning to E-Vote?規劃電子投票？ Read This First閱讀這本第一
- At JFK Airport, Denying Basic Rights Is Just Another Day at the Office在JFK機場，無可否認的基本權利，只不過是另一天在辦公室
- LA City Council Decides to Outlaw New Fast Food Restaurants洛杉磯市議會決定取締新的快餐店
- A Cultural History of the Magic Mushroom文化的歷史，神奇的蘑菇
- US oil pipeline politics and the Russia-Georgia conflict美國的石油管道的政治和俄羅斯-格魯吉亞衝突
- Pentagon can’t find $2.3 trillion, wasting trillions on ‘national defense’五角大樓無法找到二三〇 〇 〇 〇 〇 〇 〇 〇 〇 〇 〇美元，浪費了數萬億關於'國防'
More更多 Breaking News突發新聞
Archive 存檔
- August 2008 2008年8月
- July 2008 2008年7月
- June 2008 2008年6月
- May 2008 2008年5月
- April 2008 2008年4月
- March 2008 2008年3月
- February 2008 2008年2月
- January 2008 2008年1月
- December 2007 2007年12月
- November 2007 2007年11月
- October 2007 2007年10月
- September 2007 2007年9月
- August 2007 2007年8月
- July 2007 2007年7月
- June 2007 2007年6月
- May 2007 2007年5月
- April 2007 2007年4月
- March 2007 2007年3月
Why repression at home and aggresion abroad ?為什麼鎮壓在國內和國外aggresion ？ I think this article has some answers, please read:我認為這篇文章一些答案，請參閱：
http://democracyandsocialism.com/Articles/WhyRecession.html http://democracyandsocialism.com/articles/whyrecession.html