NSA °¨½Ã¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ÀüÈ È¸»ç¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¸éÁ¦¿¡ °üÇÏ¿© Àǽɽº·¯¿î ÀÇȸ
ÀüÈ È¸»ç¿¡°Ô ¸éÃ¥ Çã°¡¿¡ ºÎ½Ã ÇàÁ¤ºÎÀÇ È®°íÇÑ ÀÚ¼¼¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸Çϰí, À̽´¸¦ ´Ù½Ã¿¡ Á¦±âÇÏ´Â ÀÇȸ Èñ¸ÁÀº ÀüÈ È¸»ç°¡ Á¤ºÎ¿¡ Á¦°øÇÑ ¹«½¼À» Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¾Ë¾Æ³½´Ù, º¸°í Ars Technica.
ºÎ½Ã ÇàÁ¤ºÎ´Â ±×µéÀÇ È°µ¿ÀÇ ÇÕ¹ý¿¡ °ü°è ¾øÀÌ ÀüÈ È¸»ç¸¦ À§ÇÑ ¼Ò±ÞÇÏ´Â ¸éÁ¦¸¦ ¿ä±¸Çß´Ù. Silvestre Reyes (D-TX), Áý Á¤º¸ À§¿øÈ¸ÀÇ ÀÇÀåÀº ÇÒÁöµµ ÀÌ È¸»ç°¡ ¸ð¸¥ ¹«½¼À» Á¤È®ÇÏ°Ô ¾Ë¾Æ³»±â À§ÇÏ¿© ¾Ë¾Æ³»±â À§ÇÏ¿©, û¹®È¸¸¦ ¿´Â °ÍÀ» ¿¹Á¤ÇÑ´Ù.
¡°Before granting immunity for any activities, it will be important to review what those activities were, what was the legal basis for those activities, and what would be the impact of a grant of immunity,¡± Reyes said in a statement.
Under consideration are whether the NSA¡¯s surveillance program was legal and if the laws need to be changed to allow intelligence agencies to better track terrorist communications.
Reyes says that he ¡°will not prejudge the outcome of these hearings,¡± but the fact that he has serious questions about the retroactive immunity suggests that he won¡¯t be easily persuaded to sign off on it. That¡¯s good news for organizations like the EFF, which is embroiled in a lawsuit with AT&T over the issue. Even if the administration doesn¡¯t get its way in Congress, it will continue to push for the courts to throw out such cases on the grounds that they will expose state secrets. Thus far, though, the combined case against the telephone companies remains alive.
Copyright © 2006 CNET Networks, Inc.
NSA Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Congress doubtful about immunity for phone companies in NSA spying' :
Related News:














¼±Àû¡¦













