Bush non può ricordare perchè l'esercito iracheno ha disperso
Nei brani di biografia, dice che inizialmente ha desiderato effettuare le forze: `Yeah, non posso ricordarmi di.'
Una delle azioni il più pesante criticate nel guaime degli Stati Uniti - l'invasione condotta di Irak nel marzo 2003 era la decisione, a mala pena due mesi più successivamente, disperdere l'esercito iracheno, allontanante gli ex soldati e movente molti diritti nella truppa dei gruppi anti-Americani del militante.
Ma i brani di nuova biografia del presidente Bush lo mostrano che dice che inizialmente ha desiderato effettuare l'esercito iracheno e, più sorpresa, che non può ricordare perchè la sua gestione ha deciso disperderla.
“La politica era di mantenere l'esercito intatto; didn’t happen,” Bush told biographer Robert Draper in excerpts published in Sunday’s New York Times.
Draper pressed Bush to explain why, if he wanted to maintain the army, his chief administrator for Iraq, L. Paul Bremer III, issued an order in May 2003 disbanding the 400,000-strong army without pay.
“Yeah, I can’t remember; I’m sure I said, ‘This is the policy, what happened?’ ” Bush said, adding: “Again, Hadley’s got notes on all this stuff” — a reference to national security advisor Stephen J. Hadley.
Spokesmen for the White House and former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld declined to comment about the excerpts Sunday. Bremer could not be reached for comment.
Douglas J. Feith, then undersecretary of Defense for policy and an architect of the Iraq invasion, said the excerpts raised interesting questions about how the pivotal decision was made.
Feith was deeply involved in the decision-making process at the time, working closely with Bush and Bremer.
In February 2003, the month before the invasion, Feith briefed Bush about plans Rumsfeld had signed off on to maintain the Iraqi army. The assumption at the time, based on information provided by the CIA, was that the army would remain intact after the invasion, Feith said.
Instead, Iraqi officers fled their posts, which were ransacked and looted. U.S. officials inherited a military that would have to be overhauled or abandoned, Feith said in an interview Sunday, and they opted for the latter.
Feith said he could not comment about how involved the president was in the decision to change policy and dissolve the army.
“I don’t know all the details of who talked to who about that,” he said.
But he said the decision warrants scrutiny.
“I know there are people out there who say one of the most significant decisions the United States made [in Iraq] was the dissolution of the Iraqi army,” Feith said. “So it’s an interesting question. But very often on these things, until everybody writes memoirs and all the researchers look at the documents, some of these things are hard to sort out. You could be in the thick of it and not necessarily know all the details.”
Feith, a visiting professor at Georgetown University, is the author of a forthcoming memoir, “War and Decision,” about his work in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Draper’s book “Dead Certain” is to be released Tuesday.
Bush Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Bush can’t recall why Iraqi army disbanded' :
Related News:














Caricamento…













