最新新聞 | 論壇 | 英國新聞 | 美國新聞 | 國際新聞 | 政治報紙 | Sci技術新聞 | 戰爭&恐怖主義新聞 | 體育新聞 | 多媒體 | 設置主頁

星期三， 2008年7月9日
談論這個報告在RINF論壇 >

由 全部賭注Donaldson | 二托尼・布萊爾的前部長和他的高級國內安全官員認為他們將投票反對總理提議的反恐怖主義法律 Gordon Brown 在議會上部房間。

前正義秘書 查爾斯以鷹狩獵者 并且前檢察長 彼得冶金匠 加入 Eliza Manningham-Buller國內間諜機構MI5的一個前頭在說他們不會支持計劃擴大時間警察可以扣留恐怖主義嫌疑犯沒有收費42天。

「我稱了平衡在生活的權利，最重要的公民自由、事實沒有這樣事像完全安全和我們來之不易的公民自由之間的重要性」， Manningham-Buller，因為所謂的crossbencher沒有參加對任何政黨，在上議院裡今天說。 「在原理內容，我不可能支持42天預先充電拘留」。

評論在也許使關鍵供應出軌的上議院發信號心神不安之內 反恐怖主義比爾 當它在立法委員之前下半年來。 在民主黨工會會員黨支持布朗的勞動政府之後，更低的下議院由九個表決邊際清除了措施。

當時 閣下 不要有當局阻攔整個恐怖主義比爾，他們的力量修正法律也許意味政府被迫剝離供應或做更多讓步保證公民自由被保護。 閣下將認為票據一行行在秋天。

當局閣下』

黨在上議院裡不舉行大多數，必須同意規則，在他們可以成為法律之前。 保守性 并且 自由派民主黨人二個最大的反對黨，投票反對政府的拘留計劃在共同性和計劃再做那麼在閣下。

大臣爭辯說，恐怖主義案件的增長的複雜意味警察需要長期審查他們。 他們援引一種涉嫌的2006劇情轟炸班機作為論點的證明為額外時間，說調查的官員是緊挨釋放嫌疑犯由於當前28天極限。

falconer， a閣下 勞方 lawmaker in the Lords who shared a room with Blair in university, said he would oppose the plans “root and branch.”

“I’m absolutely clear that there’s no advantage for fighting terrorism that will be obtained from extending detentions to 42 days,” Falconer said. The difference between the current limit of 28 days and the proposed 42 would “make no difference” to the police and to claim so is a “ridiculous assertion.”

Goldsmith’s View

Lord Goldsmith said he didn’t want to “take away freedoms that people, and our ancestors, have fought for without very good cause.” Brown took over from Blair in June 2007.

Security minister Alan West, former head of the British navy, argued the measures are necessary to protect Britain from the growing threat from international terrorists.

“We face an unprecedented terrorist threat,” West told lawmakers. “There’s a clear and present danger to our population.”

Brown says the security services are currently investigating 30 potential terrorist plots, 2,000 terrorist suspects and 200 networks. In recent cases, police needed to examine 400 separate computers, 8,000 discs and 25,000 exhibits, he says.

Conservative Opposition

The main opposition Conservative security spokeswoman in the Lords, Pauline Neville-Jones, herself a former chair of the Joint Intelligence Committee, said the plans are another attempt by the government to broach civil liberties.

“It represents yet another attack, on the part of the government, without justification, on fundamental democratic rights and freedoms that have underpinned our society for centuries,” Neville-Jones said.

Martin Thomas, who speaks on legal matters for the Liberal Democrats in the Lords, predicted “this draconian proposal will be defeated” in the upper chamber.

“The government’s proposals do not have serious support amongst senior police officers, ex-government law officers, the director of public prosecutions, the legal profession or, indeed, anyone who knows anything about the criminal justice process,” Thomas said.

See More:Terrorism Tony Blair UK News 

Discuss this report in the RINF forums >

Have Your Say: Blair Advisers Oppose Brown’s Terrorism Plan in House of Lords

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

This entry was posted on Wednesday, July 9th, 2008 at 3:22 pm and is filed under Political News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version