20 per cento del tabulato di elezione erano illeggibili

Un conteggio dopo che l'elezione presidenziale dell'anno successivo potrebbe significare il disastro per la contea di Cuyahoga basata sui problemi ha scoperto martedì con le annotazioni di carta prodotte dalle macchine di voto elettroniche.

Più di 20 per cento del tabulato dalle macchine di voto del touch-screen erano illeggibili ed hanno dovuto essere ristampati. Il bordo degli operai di elezioni ha trovato le schede elettorali danneggiate quando hanno condotto un conteggio martedì di due corse, che hanno coinvolto soltanto 17 di recinti della contea 1.436.

Il conteggio ha durato più di 12 ore. Reprinting the damaged records and hand-counting them created an extra step that added hours.

“If it is as close as it’s been for the last two presidential elections and it’s that close again in 2008, God help us if we have to depend on Cuya- hoga County as the deciding factor with regard to making the decision on who the next president of the United States is,” said County Commissioner Jimmy Dimora, a longtime opponent of the county’s touch-screen voting system.

Board of Elections Director Jane Platten said recounting the entire county for the 2008 presidential election could take more than a week.

“The high number of paper audit trails that need to be reprinted was at best a difficult task to have to work through,” Platten said. “I think that’s going to be an indication of future recounts.”

Tuesday’s recounts were for a North Royalton City Council seat and positions on the Bedford Heights Charter Review Commission. The recount upheld the official results that showed Dan Kasaris won the North Royalton race. Results were not available Tuesday night for the Bedford Heights election.

Cuyahoga County uses touch-screen voting machines that store votes on a memory card inside each machine. On Election Day, a paper record of each ballot is printed inside each machine on long reels of paper.

The printout is the paper trail used during recounts. If it’s damaged and unreadable — usually because the paper jammed when printing — a new copy is printed from the machine’s memory card.

“It’s workable, but tedious,” said board member Rob Frost after watching Tuesday’s recounts. “I think that’s, in part, the nature of recounts.”

Election workers inspected 70 paper printouts, which represented nearly 4,400 ballots cast Nov. 6 in North Royalton and Bedford Heights. Election workers found 15 of the 70 printouts damaged and those had to be reprinted.

“This is very much a cause for concern,” board member Inajo Davis Chappell said. “All the technology issues pose a challenge to us, especially given the volume of voters we expect in the primary.”

Diebold Inc. made the county’s voting equipment. The company renamed its elections division Premier Election Solutions. The high percentage of damaged paper trails seen on Tuesday is not typical, Premier spokesman Chris Riggall said. “That is a percentage that prompts us to do further investigation,” he said.

The board has two more recounts scheduled to begin today: A race for Olmsted Falls City Council and a seat on the Solon Board of Education. The recounts on Tuesday and today were automatically triggered because the margin of victory was one-half of 1 percent or less.

The damaged paper records found Tuesday were another problem for the board following the Nov. 6 countywide election.

The county still doesn’t know why its vote-counting software crashed twice election night. An investigation into the software problem could begin next week, once the county’s recounts are finished.

Ohio Secretary of State Jennifer Brunner hopes to answer concerns about the county’s voting system. She has initiated a statewide voting equipment review. A report expected Dec. 14 could recommend changes.

Meanwhile, elections officials must determine the best way to hold elections with their current machinery.

“I wish those paper trails would come out pristine — and they don’t, and they’re not going to,” Platten said. “We’re going to have to deal with it again.”

Comment on '20 percent of election printouts were unreadable' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News: