Trump Hotel Unlawfully "Restraining and Coercing" Las Vegas Culinary Workers

Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Photo: Eric Huang)Trump Hotel in Las Vegas, Nevada. Trump International has been slapped with charges by federal officials over alleged unfair labor practices. (Photo: Eric Huang)

The National Labor Relations Board alleged that the hotel company of Republican presidential primary front-runner Donald Trump “has been interfering with, restraining and coercing” the rights of its workers in Las Vegas.

The complaint, issued last week by the NLRB, said Trump International Hotel offered sweetheart deals to employees who rejected a unionization drive and retaliated against two workers who supported the initiative. The successful union drive was led by the Culinary Workers Union Local 226.

“Specifically, the complaint alleges that a hotel labor consultant told employees last year that the Culinary would not help them and said ‘it would be futile for them to select the union as their bargaining representative,'” VEGAS INC reported. The filing also said Trump International guaranteed “job opportunities to transfer to different positions” in exchange for opposition to unionization.

The NLRB also found that Trump International “terminated a certain employee and did not transfer another one to a full-time server job” because of pro-union activities.

Federal law grants workers “the right to self-organization, to form, join, or assist labor organizations, to bargain collectively through representatives of their own choosing, and to engage in other concerted activities for the purpose of collective bargaining or other mutual aid or protection.”

The Culinary Union noted that Trump International has already been slapped with charges by federal officials over alleged unfair labor practices. Prior complaints involved: the limiting of workers’ ability to communicate; surveillance and interrogations; “intimidation of employees by Trump management and security staff, including a manager physically pushing employees,” and other disciplinary actions in retaliation for pro-union activity.

Last week’s complaint…

Read more