Fool’s Errand: NATO Pledges Four More Years of War in Afghanistan

The longest war in US history just got even longer. As NATO wrapped up its
2016 Warsaw Summit, the organization agreed to continue funding Afghan security
forces through the year 2020. Of course with all that funding comes US and NATO
troops, and thousands of contractors, trainers, and more.

President Obama said last week that the US must keep 3,000 more troops than
planned in Afghanistan. The real reason is obvious: the mission has failed and
Washington cannot bear to admit it. But Obama didn’t put it that way. He
said:

“It is in our national security interest, especially after all the blood
and treasure we’ve invested over the years, that we give our partners in
Afghanistan the best chance to succeed.”

This is how irrational Washington’s logic is. Where else but in government
would you see it argued that you cannot stop spending on a project because you
have already spent so much to no avail? In the real world, people who invest
their own hard-earned money in a failed scheme do something called “cut
your losses.” Government never does that.

Isn’t 15 years of US “blood and treasure” enough of a “best
chance” to succeed?

NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg announced at the summit that thanks
to an additional billion dollars in NATO member-country donations, the organization
had come up with close to the $5 billion per year that it has pledged to the
Afghan government. Of that $5 billion you can guess who is paying the lion’s
share. That’s right, we are. We send $3.45 billion every year to, according
to Transparency International, the third most corrupt country on earth – while
Americans struggle with unemployment, stagnant wages, and inflation. That is
why I always say that foreign aid is money stolen from poor people in the United
States and sent to rich people overseas.

NATO head Stoltenberg said, “Our message is clear: Afghanistan doesn’t
stand alone. We’re committed for the long haul.” How nice of the Norwegian
politician to commit Americans to financing the war in Afghanistan for “the
long haul.”

When I suggested in a recent interview that the only sensible US policy in
Afghanistan would be to bring all the troops home, the host asked whether I
was worried the Taliban would rush in to fill the vacuum. That’s what has
already happened, I said. The Taliban are stronger than ever in Afghanistan.
They control more territory than at any time since the original US invasion
in 2001. Despite 15 years of US interventionism, nearly 2,500 dead US soldiers,
and well over a trillion dollars, Afghanistan is no closer to being a model
democracy than it was before 9/11. It’s a failed policy. It’s a purposeless
war. It is a failed program.

The neocons argue that Iraq, Libya, and other US interventions fell apart because
the US did not stay long…

Read more