|
|
Translate:
              Wikileaks back on the Web
Sunday, March 2nd, 2008 Case that riled privacy advocates turns on unrelated technicalities In a move sure to be welcomed by privacy and civil rights advocates, a California District Court judge on Friday lifted a previous permanent injunction that he had issued two weeks ago to disable the controversial Wikileaks.org whistleblower Web site. Judge Jeffrey White of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California in San Francisco also declined to extend a temporary restraining order he had issued on Jan 15 against Wikileaks. That order prohibited Wikileaks from displaying, posting, publishing, or distributing material that a Swiss bank, which had filed a lawsuit against Wikileaks, had claimed were illegally obtained and defamatory. The wikileaks.org domain was reactivated today as a result of the decision. Judge White cited two main reasons for rescinding his previous injunctions. In a seven-page ruling, the judge noted that both the plaintiff in the case and the owner of the Wikileaks.org domain name were foreign entities and therefore outside the court’s jurisdiction. Although there is no firm evidence of the citizenship of the owner of the wikileaks.org domain name, “counsel for the [owner] represented that the owner of the domain name wikileaks.org is a citizen of Australia and a resident of Kenya,” the judge noted in his ruling. As a result the “Court is concerned that it may well lack subject matter jurisdiction over this matter in its entirety,” Judge White noted in his ruling. He also noted that the injunctions he had issued asking Wikileaks’ domain registrar Dynadot to disable the domain name was totally pointless. “The record currently before the Court indicates that even the broad injunction issued as to Dynadot had exactly the opposite effect as was intended,” the judge noted in his ruling. Not only did the disputed material continue to be available via numerous mirror sites, the media attention generated by the case ensured that more people knew about the availability of the information on the Internet than before, he said. “The Court is not convinced that Plaintiffs have made an adequate showing that any restraining injunction in this case would serve its intended purpose,” Judge White said. “In addition, there is evidence in the record that “the cat is out of the bag” and the issuance of an injunction would therefore be ineffective to protect the professed privacy rights of the bank’s clients,” he said. The ruling comes two weeks after Judge White issued two injunctions against Wikileaks. The injunctions were in response to a lawsuit filed by the Julius Baer Group, a Swiss bank that, according to documents on Wikileaks, was involved in offshore money laundering and tax evasion in the Cayman Islands for customers in several countries, including the U.S. Wikileaks claimed the documents had been leaked by a bank employee. In its complaint, the Swiss bank claimed that Wikileaks published hundreds of illegally obtained documents and confidential and copyrighted information belonging to the bank. The bank sued both Wikileaks and its domain registrar Dynadot. In response, White issued a permanent injunction ordering Dynadot to immediately disable the wikileaks.org domain name and lock it to prevent the domain from being transferred to another registrar. The injunction also required Dynadot to immediately remove all DNS hosting records for the wikileaks.org domain name. The court asked Dynadot to prevent the domain name from resolving to the Wikileaks Web site or any other Web site or server “other than a blank park page.” The judge also issued a temporary restraining order that forbade Wikileaks from displaying, posting, publishing, or distributing any material pertaining to the bank on any site that it directly owned or over which it had any control. The order instructed Wikileaks to ensure that all of the bank’s information was removed from all Web sites it owned or controlled, to disable links to the material on such sites, and to provide the court with proof that it had complied with the orders. The judge’s order even enjoined everyone who read the order or received notice of it from publishing or even linking to the documents. The rulings drew scathing criticism from privacy and civil rights groups that saw it as a flagrant violation of First Amendment rights. Several felt the court had overreacted in ordering the entire domain shut down, just because a relatively small number of documents it hosted were being disputed. Earlier this week, several privacy and civil rights advocates announced their support for Wikileaks in the case. The Electronic Frontier Foundation and the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) filed a motion seeking the court’s permission to formally intervene in the case. Expressing similar support was Harvard Law School’s Berkman Center for Internet & Society’s Citizen Media Law Project (CMLP). Earlier this week, the center filed a brief opposing the court’s injunctions against Wikileaks and its domain registrar Dynadot LLC. The amici curiae (friends of the court) brief, which was developed in collaboration with several media and public-interest organizations, asked the court to take back its decision and cited First Amendment concerns. A statement issued by the EFF today expressed satisfaction at Judge White’s decision. “We’re very pleased that Judge White recognized the serious constitutional concerns raised by his earlier orders,” EFF senior staff attorney Matt Zimmerman was quoted as saying in the statement. “Attempting to interfere with the operation of an entire website because you have a dispute over some of its content is never the right approach. Disabling access to an Internet domain in an effort to prevent the world from accessing a handful of widely-discussed documents is not only unconstitutional — it simply won’t work.” Computerworld is an InfoWorld affiliate. Have Your Say: Wikileaks back on the Web Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
'U-turn' West: MI5 watching 'great' terror plot right now Last post by Unregistered @ 04:12 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Hot Off The Press Last post by ZingPao @ 03:41 AM As the Violence Soars, Mexico Signals It's Had Enough of America's Stupid War on Drug Last post by ZingPao @ 03:34 AM Vote Third Party Last post by ZingPao @ 03:23 AM Men Create the Demand; Women Are the Supply Last post by ZingPao @ 03:18 AM Scientology Customer Assaults Rights Activist in Los Angeles Last post by ZingPao @ 03:08 AM They Can't Fight Without Us! Last post by ZingPao @ 02:46 AM 1984 (Forgive Me) Last post by ZingPao @ 02:40 AM CIA using missile strikes to `tickle' terrorists Last post by ZingPao @ 02:23 AM Freedom Of Expression, Liverpool 11th Oct 08 PT1 Last post by ZingPao @ 02:07 AM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More Breaking News  Archive |
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS |
|
|
Chomsky: Anti-Democratic Nature of US Capitalism is Being Exposed Democracy Now Follows Up on NSA's Illegal Spying and War Crimes The October Surprise: Global Panic |
ZingPao commented on: The October Surprise: Global Panic Great story, thanks for posting. People need to act. Where have “WE THE PEOPLE” gone????? Continue Reading & Reply R Dujour commented on: Democracy Now Follows Up on NSA’s Illegal Spying and War Crimes Why do I find myself yelling at the radio, “ask the follow up... Continue Reading & Reply Velma commented on: The Right Dictates MSNBC’s Programming Decisions Keith it is so good to listen to you.Sean Hannity, Bill o Reilly used to make my heart... Continue Reading & Reply Jacob commented on: Jim Rogers Urges People to Sell U.S. Dollar Holdings Hope you stopped listening to Mr. Rogers before he urged this action. Sionce this... Continue Reading & Reply |
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
