RINF.COM : THE BREAKING NEWS ALTERNATIVE rinf.com :突發新聞的替代

Sunday, June 29th, 2008週日, 2008年6月29日
rinf論壇
Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁
BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞
NEW RINF FORUM! 新rinf論壇!

Propaganda and the media宣傳和新聞媒體

Monday, May 19th, 2008 週一, 2008年5月19日

paper.jpg By通過 Joseph L. Galloway約瑟夫的影響,加洛韋 | Once upon a time, it was widely believed that one of the greatest sins the US government or its temporary political masters could commit was to turn a propaganda machine loose on the American people. |黃飛鴻一時間,人們普遍認為,其中一個最大的捷聯慣導系統,美國政府或其臨時政治的主人,可以承諾是,把鬆散的宣傳機器對美國人民。

Congress viewed this so seriously that every appropriations bill passed since 1951 has contained language that says no public money “shall be used for publicity or propaganda purposes within the United States” without the lawmakers’ prior approval.大會認為,這樣的認真,每撥款法案通過的自1951年以來已載的語言說,沒有市民的錢“應用於宣傳或宣傳用途,美國”沒有立法者的事先批准。

The Bush administration has been caught violating the propaganda ban before, notably in 2005 in the case of radio host Armstrong Williams, who was paid to endorse President Bush’s No Child Left Behind law.布什政府一直陷入違反宣傳禁令之前,尤其是在2005年,在案件電台主持人阿姆斯特朗威廉姆斯,誰支付給贊同布什總統的沒有一個孩子掉隊法。

Particularly abhorrent to the US Government Accountability Office (GAO), which oversees compliance with the ban, is an agency’s use of “covert propaganda” or “covert attempts to mold opinion through the undisclosed use of third parties.”特別是可惡的向美國政府問責辦公室(高) ,負責監督遵守禁令,是一個機構使用的“暗宣傳”或“秘密的企圖模具的意見,通過公開使用第三方” 。

This is why alarm bells should be ringing all over Washington about The New York Times’ disclosure that then-Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld encouraged a secret Pentagon program to care for and spoon-feed more than 50 retired senior military officers whom the administration deemed reliable friends who could be counted on “to carry our water” on the television and cable networks.這就是為什麼敲響了警鐘,應振鈴所有超過華盛頓對新的紐約時報披露當時的局長國防部長拉姆斯菲爾德鼓勵一個秘密,五角大樓計劃向關心和填鴨式飼料50多個退休的高級軍事官員,其中政府被視為可靠的朋友,誰可以指望“進行我們的水”在電視和有線廣播電視網絡。

Feeding the military analysts “key and valuable information” in secret briefings by Pentagon and White House officials, the idea went, would make them the go-to guys for the networks and encourage the networks to “weed out the less reliably friendly analysts .吃飯軍事分析家“的關鍵和寶貴的資料”的秘密簡報,五角大樓和白宮官員的思想,每到一地,會令他們去到球員為網絡和鼓勵網絡,以“淘汰較差的可靠友好的分析師。 . . .” “ 。

This 2005 memorandum, addressed to then Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs Larry DiRita, added: “This trusted core group will be more than willing to work closely with us because we are their bread and butter.”這個2005年的備忘錄,給當時的助理國務卿,國防部負責公共事務的拉里迪裡塔補充說: “這值得信賴的核心小組將多於願意工作,與我們密切合作,因為我們是他們的麵包和奶油” 。

Asked about the case of Col. Bill Cowan, who says he was fired as a military analyst for Fox News and cut off from the briefings for criticizing the war effort, DiRita told問及有關案件上校條例草案Cowan先生,誰說,他被解僱,作為一個軍事分析家為Fox News和切斷從簡報批評戰爭的努力,迪裡塔說: Glenn Greenwald of Salon.com:格倫格林瓦德的salon.com : “I don’t know anything. “我不知道任何事情。 I saw that in the story.我看到在這個故事。 I’ve heard other assertions to that effect.我聽說過其他的斷言即行生效。 It was certainly not the intent.”它當然不是意圖“ 。

In a follow-up e-mail exchange between DiRita and Greenwald, Rumsfeld’s former mouthpiece — now Bank of America’s chief spokesman — elaborated on what he said he didn’t remember: “I simply don’t have any recollection of trying to restrict him (Cowan) or others from exposure to what was going on.”在後續電子郵件交換之間的迪裡塔和格林瓦德,拉姆斯菲爾德的前喉舌-現在美國銀行的首席發言人-闡述了什麼他說,他不記得:“我根本沒有任何記憶試圖限制他( Cowan先生)或其他人從接觸到發生什麼事情“ 。

DiRita added: “There are plenty of examples to the contrary — reaching out to people who specifically disagreed with us.迪裡塔補充說: “有很多例子,相反-接觸的人誰不同意特別是與我們。 One example I recall is Joe Galloway — a persistent critic and apparently popular with military readers.其中一個例子,我記得是喬加洛韋-持之以恆,評論家和顯然是受歡迎的與軍事的讀者。 He came in and met Secretary Rumsfeld and we had other interactions.”他來到在並會見了美國國防部長拉姆斯菲爾德和我們有其他的相互作用“ 。

Now that’sa real knee-slapper: Me as a poster boy for how Rumsfeld and DiRita “reached out” to their harshest critics even as they stroked and promoted and schemed to embed the old reliables to wax enthusiastic about a war that was going from bad to worse.現在that'sa真正的膝關節衝擊片:我作為一個海報男孩如何,拉姆斯菲爾德和五角大樓“達成”他們的最嚴厲的批評,甚至因為他們撫摸,並推動和策劃的嵌入歲reliables蠟熱衷於戰爭,這是從下愈況。

Let the record show that Rumsfelds’ folks reached out to me on these few occasions:讓紀錄顯示, rumsfelds '鄉親所達成的向我對這些少數的場合:

  • In early summer of 2003, half a dozen of us were invited to an off-the-record lunch with Rumsfeld in the Pentagon.早在2003年夏天,一半十多我們被邀請一名休-紀錄午餐與拉姆斯菲爾德在五角大樓。 The defense secretary seemed to have a poor grasp of the reality on the ground in Iraq and was still declaring that we’d do no nation-building there.國防部長似乎有一個貧窮的把握現實,在地面上和在伊拉克仍宣稱,我們很樂意這樣做,沒有任何國家建設。 He saw no insurgency, only a handful of “dead-enders”.他認為沒有叛亂,只有屈指可數的幾個“死恩德斯” 。
  • In October 2005, DiRita called to invite me to travel with Rumsfeld to the Middle East and Australia.在2005年10月,迪裡塔的所謂邀請我前往與拉姆斯菲爾德向中東和澳大利亞。 I declined because it conflicted with a long-booked graduation speech I was to give at Luke Air Force Base, Ariz. to a class of new Air Force F-16 fighter pilots that included my nephew. i下降,因為它不符合一個長期的預訂畢業的講話,我給在盧克空軍基地,亞利桑那州的一類新的空軍F - 16戰鬥機飛行員,其中包括我的侄兒。 DiRita was stunned that I wouldn’t drop a bunch of fighter pilots to be schmoozed by his boss.狄利塔感到震驚,我不會下降,一群戰鬥機飛行員要schmoozed他的老闆。
  • In November 2005, DiRita invited me to a “one-on-one” lunch with Rumsfeld at the Pentagon.在2005年11月,迪裡塔邀請我了“一對一的”午餐與拉姆斯菲爾德在五角大樓。 This one I accepted.此一我接受。 I arrived to find across the table Rumsfeld, the then-Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Marine Gen. Peter Pace; Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Dick Cody; Joint Staff Director Lt. Gen. Walter Sharp and DiRita.我到達時發現整個表拉姆斯菲爾德,當時的主席,參謀長聯席會議,海洋上將佩斯;陸軍副參謀長科迪將軍迪克;合辦工作人員中將主任沃爾特夏普和迪裡塔。 We went at it hammer and tongs for an hour and a half over their conduct of the war and the errors that were costing the lives of American soldiers.我們去把它錘和鉗為一個半小時以上,他們進行的戰爭和錯誤,被成本的生命,美國士兵。 As I left, I told Rumsfeld that正如我離開,我告訴拉姆斯菲爾德說, I’d continue to point out those mistakes我要繼續指出,這些錯誤 every week in my column.每星期在我的專欄。
  • In April 2006, DiRita sent me an e-mail telling me that my most recent column was “silly”.在2006年4月,迪裡塔寄給我的一封電子郵件,告訴我,我最近期欄是“傻” 。 That column had discussed an該欄曾討論一 expensive war game昂貴的戰爭遊戲 the Pentagon conducted about a US attack on a thinly disguised country that obviously was Iran.五角大樓進行的關於美國的攻擊就一薄變相的國家,顯然是伊朗。

A retired Marine general, Paul Van Riper, had been the commander of the “enemy” forces, and he used unconventional tactics to destroy the US Navy flotilla in the Persian Gulf, leaving thousands of sailors and Marines dead.一位退休海軍陸戰隊上將,保羅範riper ,已指揮官“敵”的力量,他用非常規戰術摧毀美國海軍艦隊在波斯灣,使數以千計的水兵和海軍陸戰隊隊員死亡。 At that point, the commanders stopped the war game, reset everything and imposed new rules forbidding Van Riper from employing those tactics.Van Riper walked out, furious, and requested an investigation.在這一點上,指揮官停止戰爭遊戲,重置的一切和所施加的新規則,禁止客貨車riper僱用那些tactics.van riper走出來,憤怒,並要求進行調查。 DiRita complained in his e-mail that I was silly to blame Rumsfeld for this and for covering up the investigators’ report.狄利塔抱怨,在他的電子郵件,我是愚蠢的責任,拉姆斯菲爾德為這和掩蓋了調查報告。 After all, he wrote, Rumsfeld couldn’t be expected to know retired generals several levels below him or to bear responsibility for such matters.畢竟,他寫道:拉姆斯菲爾德不能指望知道退役將領幾個層次下面他或承擔責任等事宜。 His complaint sparked an escalating e-mail war that most reckon DiRita lost.他的投訴引起了不斷升級的電子郵件戰爭,大部分估計,迪裡塔失去了。 The entire exchange was posted on the Internet and can still be found there.整個外匯被張貼在因特網上,並仍然可以在那裡發現。

So much for the Rumsfeld/DiRita outreach to their critics.這麼多為拉姆斯菲爾德/迪裡塔外展他們的批評。 They were much too busy hand-feeding horse manure to their TV generals, who in turn were feeding the same product to the American public by the cubic yard.他們太忙碌,一方面哺育馬糞,以他們的電視將領,誰在又被餵食同樣的產品向美國公眾所立方碼。

There’s little doubt that this program violated the laws against covert propaganda operations mounted against the American public by their own government.有的,毫無疑問,這一計劃違反了法律對秘密宣傳行動,對美國公眾由他們自己的政府。 But in this administration, there’s no one left to enforce that law or any of the other laws the Bush operatives have been busy violating.但在這方面,政府當局,有沒有人離開,以執行法律或任何其他法律,布什操作工一直忙於侵犯。

The real crime is that the scheme worked.真正的罪行是該計劃的工作。 The television network bosses swallowed the bait, the hook, the line and the sinker, and they have yet to answer for it.該電視網絡的老闆吞下誘餌,鉤,線和片,而他們也還沒有答案。

See More: 看到更多的:

Have Your Say: Propaganda and the media 你說:宣傳和媒體
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意,只有選定的評論將出版。

Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇

3 Responses to “Propaganda and the media”三反應“的宣傳和媒體”

  1. The Big Raven 大烏鴉
    Posted: May 20th, 2008 at 4:27 pm 發布時間: 2008年5月20日在下午4時27分

    Do you ever wonder how in the hell did we get to this place in time and space?你想知道如何在地獄,我們去這個地方在時間和空間呢? Killing for the sake of killing or better put lying until the lies become truths.殺害為殺害或更好地把說謊,直到謊言成為真理。
    Now dont be fooled with ole Joe galloway hes a warmonger from the “old school” another pretend green breret carring his weapon around that other fake war so he could off a few of those commie bastards.現在不要被矇騙,用OLE喬加洛韋在一九九九至二零零零一warmonger從“老同學”的另一個假裝綠色breret攜帶武器,他周圍的其他假戰爭,所以他可以關閉數那些commie雜種。
    A propaganist complaining about propaganda is moot! 1 propaganist抱怨宣傳是模擬!
    Until this country can face up to the real truths we are DOOMED to all out war for ever.直到這個國家可以面對,以真正的真理,我們是注定要所有的戰爭,永遠。 So please save all your jonny come latly wishes about the horrows of war when these types of articles should have and could have been written at the begining of this immoral war.因此,請妥善保存您所有的傑哈尼來latly的意願,有關horrows戰爭時,這些類型的文章,應該有可能已寫在本月初,不道德的戰爭。
    It was the media and the goverment and the warmongering money makers who con-spired to make war , the hipocrazy of the american people is stinking and as the users know very predicable so much so that it is easy to start wars based on phoney patriots and false flag missions.這是媒體和政府與好戰的錢,製造商誰協商螺旋,使戰爭中, hipocrazy的美國人民是臭,並作為用戶知道很可預測的,以致是很容易的開始戰爭的基礎上的假愛國者虛假國旗的任務。 Whos to blame? whos的責任呢?
    Its not just the imblciles neo-conmen its you and me with all the phoney patriotical bullcrap we can muster and thats one truth we have a hard time swallowing.它不只是imblciles新conmen其你和我所有的假patriotical bullcrap我們可以把握和這就是一個真理,我們有一個艱難的吞嚥。
    This society is based on greed and as long as we follow this way of being we are DOOMED.這個社會是基於貪婪和作為只要我們按照這樣的被我們是注定。 There are only two questions that really need to be answered目前只有兩個問題,真正需要回答
    1)Who read and reads all that propaganda and why? 1 )誰閱讀並讀取所有宣傳,為什麼呢?
    2)HEY JOE!Where ya going with that gun in your hand? 2 )餵喬!何處去亞與槍在您的手?
    Manifested Destiny yeah right!體現了命運的權利啊!

    Reply回复 | Quote selected text引用選定的文本 | Link to this鏈接到本

  2. White Raven 白烏鴉
    Posted: May 21st, 2008 at 7:09 am 發布時間: 2008年5月21日在上午07時09分

    Hey Big Raven,嘿大烏鴉,
    The individual lies (propaganda) dont matter anymore - its ALL a tissue of lies in support of maintaining a system of lies.個別謊言(宣傳)的事不要再-其所有的組織的謊言,在支持維持一個制度的謊言。 I fully agree with your point regarding “propaganist complaining about propaganda is moot” …..’laughable’ is the word that comes to mind!我完全同意你提出的關於“ propaganist抱怨宣傳是模擬” … … '可笑'是一個字來銘記! In a world of communications snowed under with propaganda what else should we expect?在當前的世界通訊下雪下,與宣傳,還有什麼要我們期望?

    Your opening question is really the one we should all be examining closely - ‘How did we get to this place and time?’您的開放問題,實在是一個我們都應該緊密合作,研究-'我們是怎樣得到這個時間和地點呢?

    I have a theory: Crappy decision-making!!我有一個理論: crappy決策! About 6.5 thousand years ago female totems of worship started to be replaced by male totems and over a period of about 500 years all the female totems were discarded - this appears to have happened world wide at around the same time.約六千五百年前的女性圖騰崇拜開始取代由男性圖騰及以上的,為期約五百年的所有女性的圖騰,被丟棄的-這似乎已發生了世界各地的大約同一時間舉行。 Since that time the worlds populations have been subjected to entirely biased and un-representative decision-making systems, eg monarchies, military junta’s, governments and law-makers who were and are still, predominantly male.自那時以來,世界人口已受到完全偏見和聯合國代表決策制度,如君主制,軍政府的,政府和法律的決策者,誰過去和現在都仍然是,男性為主。
    To me, this is THE underlying and root cause of todays issues.對我來說,這是基本的和的根源,今天的問題。 The decision-making apparatus is simply too narrow and is run by too few men who like power.決策儀器簡直是太狹窄,是由太少的男子一樣,誰的權力。 Men build hierarchical structures of governance in order to maintain their power.男子建立分層治理結構,以維持其權力。 Whether those structures are monarchies, governments or businesses matters not.是否這些結構是君主政體,各國政府或企業的事宜。 Its the decision-making that matters and these structures simply do not and cannot represent anything other than the interests of their makers/maintainers.其決策的事項,以及這些結構根本不和不能代表以外的任何利益,他們的決策者/維護者。
    So, when we ask ‘how we got here’ the answer is pretty bloody obvious - we got here through the predominance of male decision-making.所以,當我們要求' ,我們是如何在這裡'答案是相當明顯的血腥-我們得到這裡通過男性為主的決策。 We are kept ‘here’ by the same and the future looks pretty grim unless we change drastically.我們正不斷'這裡'是由同一和未來的外觀也相當漂亮嚴峻的,除非我們改變大幅。

    Reply回复 | Quote selected text引用選定的文本 | Link to this鏈接到本

  3. The Big Raven 大烏鴉
    Posted: May 21st, 2008 at 4:57 pm 發布時間: 2008年5月21日在下午4時57分

    You are right about that.你說得對。 the whole male dom, thing is so out of ballance……you put it well!整個男性DOM的,是出於巴倫斯… …你把它! thanks and have a peacefilled day!感謝,並有一個peacefilled一天!

    Reply回复 | Quote selected text引用選定的文本 | Link to this鏈接到本

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

This entry was posted on Monday, May 19th, 2008 at 5:46 pm and is filed under 此項目被張貼在週一, 2008年5月19日在下午5時46分,並提交下 General 一般 , Media News 新聞 . You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應,此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ,或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。
Translations 翻譯
Translate to EnglishÜbersetzen Sie zum Deutsch/GermanПереведите к русскому/RussianΜεταφράστε στα ελληνικά/GreekVertaal aan het Nederlands/Dutchترجمة الى العربية/Arabic中文翻译/Chinese Traditional中文翻译/Chinese Simplified한국어에게 번역하십시오/Korean日本語に翻訳しなさい /JapaneseTraduza ao Português/PortugueseTraduca ad Italiano/ItalianTraduisez au Français/FrenchTraduzca al Español/Spanish Free Newsletter 免費通訊

Related News 相關新聞

Network This Report 網絡本報告

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. 這些圖標鏈接到社會書籤網站,讀者可以分享和發現新的網頁。
  • del.icio.us
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Slashdot
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Spurl
  • Fark
  • Netscape

Email This Page To A Friend 電子郵件此頁給朋友
Latest Headlines 最新的新聞標題

Archive 存檔
TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS top新聞討論
LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息討論
LATEST FORUM TOPICS 最新的論壇主題
Blackwater, skirting federal law, using cache of AK-47s 黑水, skirting聯邦法律,利用高速緩存的AK - 47衝鋒槍

We can strike back 我們可以反擊

Along For Fluoride 一直為氟化物

Mind-Forged Manacles 心偽造梏

Facing the Truth About the American Voter 面對真相的美國選民

EU Constitution author says referendums can be ignored 歐盟憲法的作者說,公投可以被忽略

Welcome Home, Soldier: Now Shut Up 歡迎回家,士兵:現在閉嘴

NATO: 6,000 troops urgently needed in Afghanistan 北約: 6000部隊急需在阿富汗

US to carry on military trials at Gitmo despite ruling 美國繼續進行軍事審判在關塔那摩儘管執政黨

"Blood and Oil" an Important Film to See and Share “用鮮血和石油”的一個重要電影看到和分享

Government Study Criticizes Bush Administration’s Measures of Progress in Iraq 政府的研究,批評布什政府的措施的進展情況在伊拉克

Fortress Britain 英國堡壘

Iraq authorities say US soldiers killed 9 civilians 伊拉克當局說,陣亡的美軍士兵9平民

CCTV doesn't keep us safe, yet the cameras are everywhere 中央電視台沒有使我們的安全,但攝影機,到處都是

Joe Russo 喬魯索 commented on: 評論:
Neil Young on Impeaching Bush 尼爾楊就彈劾布什
Amen!!!!! 阿!!!!! I agree 100% 我同意100 %
Continue Reading & Reply 繼續讀&答复

Aldo 阿爾多 commented on: 評論:
We can strike back 我們可以反擊
MP’s took a pay freeze last week how noble, but they forgot to mention that they took an 18% rise on their expenses... 國會議員採取了凍薪上星期如何崇高,但他們忘了提,他們採取了18 %上升對他們的開支...
Continue Reading & Reply 繼續讀&答复

OzInExile ozinexile commented on: 評論:
The Nuclear Expert Who Never Was 核專家從來沒有誰是
“Albright , operating under the guise of his creation, ISIS, has a track record of inserting hype... “奧爾布賴特,經營的幌子下,他的創作, ISIS的,已記錄的插入炒作...
Continue Reading & Reply 繼續讀&答复

Aldo 阿爾多 commented on: 評論:
Welcome Home, Soldier: Now Shut Up 歡迎回家,士兵:現在閉嘴
Thats why most military personel are stupid, only stupid people would have trouble using their own brains,... 這就是為什麼大多數軍事人員是愚蠢的,只有愚蠢的人將很難使用他們自己動腦筋, ...
Continue Reading & Reply 繼續讀&答复

RSS Forum Posts Temp Offline - See Latest Forum Posts 論壇的RSS職位氣溫離線-看到最新的論壇職位
Activism & Protest News 積極與抗議新聞 | | Business News 商業新聞 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公務員&人權新聞 | | Environmental News 環境新聞 | | Media News 新聞 | | Globalisation News 全球經濟一體化新聞 | | Web Development News Web開發新聞
ADVERTISEMENTS廣告
SITE MAPS網站地圖
WOWEB - Web Design woweb -網頁設計

FAST GATEWAY - Web Hosting快速通道-虛擬主機

INFOTX - Web Hosting Guides and Resources infotx -虛擬主機指南和資源


ASHLEY GUEST HOUSE - Morecambe Guest House亞士厘招待所-m orecambe招待所

Never Be Lied To Again!永遠不會說謊,再次!

Subliminal Secrets Exposed潛意識的秘密暴露

Holographic Creation: Your Own Reality全息創造:你自己的現實


Masonic Secrets Revealed共濟會秘密透露


What You Aren't Supposed To Know什麼你是不是要知道
7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative Energy替代能源 Art藝術 BBC英國廣播公司 Big Brother大哥哥 Bilderberg 。 Bilderberg Biometrics生物識別技術 Bush布什 CIA美國中央情報局 Climate Change氣候變化 Cover Up掩蓋 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database State數據庫狀態 David Hicks大衛希克斯 David Ray Griffin朱射線格里芬 Democrats同盟 Demos演示 Drugs藥物 Education教育 EU歐盟 False Flag虛假國旗 FBI美國聯邦調查局 Fraud欺詐 Free Speech免費的講話 Freemasons共濟會 G8八國集團 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo關塔那摩 Health News健康新聞 History歷史 ID Cards身份證 Internet互聯網 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 Law法律 Marches遊行 MI5軍情五處 MI6軍情六處 Microsoft微軟 Military軍事 MoD按付款當日價格計算 Money金錢 Music音樂 NASA美國航天局 Neocons新保守主義者 NSA美國國家安全局 Oil石油 Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police State警察國家 Propaganda宣傳 RFID的RFID RINF rinf Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲爾德 Science科學 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Slavery奴役 Space空間 Sports體育 Spying諜報活動 Stephen Lendman斯蒂芬lendman Technology技術 Terrorism恐怖主義 Tony Blair托尼布萊爾 Torture酷刑 TV電視 UK News英國新聞 UN聯合國 USA News美國新聞 Video視頻 Voting投票 Warfare White House白宮 Wolfowitz沃爾福威茨 World News世界新聞 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003 -2 005檔案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年檔案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008檔案 | Current Archives目前檔案 | Past Version |過去的版本
About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. 所表達的意見,在rinf新聞電線和通訊是唯一的責任作者( S )和並不一定反映的意見,網站管理員。
RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. rinf.com :突破新聞與其他的媒體copyleft的-複製及分發自由。 News Forum 新聞論壇