Mittel ignoriert Ron Paul

Durch JANE OLSON

Es ist von großem Belang zu mir, daß unsere Mittel die Energie haben, zu manipulieren, wie wir gegenwärtige Fälle wahrnehmen. Wenn nur die Mittel eine zuverlässige Quelle zu Information waren, leider sind sie nicht. Wie weiß ich dieses? Nehmen Sie z.B. die Geschichte Strohabstimmung über der Zustand Republikaner' in Bismarck Okt. 26. Handschuh Romney wurde der Sieger verkündet. Der einzige Anwärter, der die republikanische Nennung verdient, ist Kongreßabgeordnetes Ron Paul, das 4 Prozent der Stimme in der Abstimmung empfing und bindet mit Mike Huckabee. What truly upset me was when I watched KFYR that night and listened to the report about the event, they showed the percentages for each of the candidates but omitted Paul’s name. The media tried alluding that Paul didn’t receive any votes. However, he was the only candidate who received votes but whose votes were not reported. Why?

Paul has gathered most of his support through the Internet, and the media have tried to ignore him. But Paul has won more straw polls than any other candidate. He appeals to the most important American citizens, the youth. Now, before the elderly population of North Dakota starts throwing their fleischkuekle and walkers at me, let me just say that the reason the youth are the most important people in any campaign is because they represent the future.

Paul supports the Constitution and our rights. In America, we support freedom and equality - that is, if you’re not a white male. We want fair elections and the only way we can have this is if we quit eating the media’s biased stuff.

In closing, if people want communism, they should vote for Hillary Clinton. If fascism, vote for Rudy Giuliani. If more of the same, vote for Fred Thompson. Finally, if they want a president who stands for freedom, is a champion of the Constitution and who is consistent when he votes, then America should cast its vote for Ron Paul.

Comment on 'Media is ignoring Ron Paul' :

RSS TrackBack URL

Related News: