Σπάζοντας ειδήσεις | Φόρουμ | Βρετανικές ειδήσεις | ΑΜΕΡΙΚΑΝΙΚΕΣ ειδήσεις | Παγκόσμιες ειδήσεις | Πολιτικές ειδήσεις | Ειδήσεις sci-τεχνολογία | Ειδήσεις πολέμου & τρομοκρατίας | Αθλητικές ειδήσεις | Πολυμέσα | Καθορισμένη αρχική σελίδα

Τετάρτη, 18η Ιουνίου 2008

Σοσιαλιστικός εργαζόμενος | Οι κυβερνήτες μας δεν μπορούν ανόητος όλοι οι άνθρωποι που όλος ο χρόνος, υποστηρίζει Sadie Robinson. Η ιδέα ότι τα μαζικής επικοινωνίας μέσα ελέγχουν τις ιδέες μας είναι πολύ κοινή. Σύμφωνα με αυτήν την θεωρία, τα μέσα ενεργούν ως είδος σύριγγας που εγχέει την προπαγάνδα άμεσα στα μυαλά μας.

Οι άνθρωποι βλέπουνε ως πρόβατα που ακολουθούν τα μέσα λίγο πολύ unthinkingly. Το συμπέρασμα είναι ότι είμαστε ανίκανος παρά τη μαζική προπαγάνδα που brainwashes εμείς στη συμμόρφωση.

Αυτή η άποψη των μέσων όχι μόνο υπάρχει στα περιθώρια της κοινωνίας. Είμαι επίσης μια κυρίαρχη ιδέα μέσα στην επικρατούσα πολιτική. Οι κύριοι αριθμοί σε όλα τα κύρια πολιτικά κόμματα βλέπουνε τη νίκη πέρα από τα μαζικής επικοινωνίας μέσα ως κλειδί στη νίκη των εκλογών - παρά έχοντας τις κόσμιες πολιτικές που οι απλοί άνθρωποι θα μπορούσαν να υποστηρίξουν.

Η έννοια ότι τα μέσα είναι παντοδύναμα χρησιμοποιείται επίσης για να γράψει μακριά οποιαδήποτε αίσθηση ότι οι άνθρωποι μπορούν να προβάλουν αντίσταση ενάντια στο σύστημα, ή ότι μπορούν να κερδηθούν μακρυά από τις ρατσιστικές ή φυλετικές ιδέες.

Όλο αυτό θέτει δύο ερωτήσεις. Το cWho ελέγχει πραγματικά τα μαζικής επικοινωνίας μέσα; Και πόσος ο αντίκτυπος κάνει αυτό έχει πραγματικά στη λαβή ανθρώπων ιδεών;

Κάτω από την κεφαλαιοκρατία τα μαζικής επικοινωνίας μέσα είναι κύρια από μια χούφτα των πλούσιων και ισχυρών ανθρώπων που αποτελούν μέρος της «κατηγορίας απόφασης» - ο μικροσκοπικός αριθμός ανθρώπων στην κορυφή της κοινωνίας που είναι κύριοι των εργοστασίων, των γραφείων και άλλων εργασιακών χώρων.

Ο Rupert Murdoch, για παράδειγμα, είναι κύριος πάνω από 175 δημοσιεύσεων τυπωμένων υλών πέρα από τον κόσμο, συμπεριλαμβανομένου του ήλιου, της The Times και των ειδήσεων του κόσμου εδώ στη Μεγάλη Βρετανία.

Καθεστώς

Η κατηγορία απόφασης επιδιώκει την προώθηση των ιδεών που δικαιολογούν το καθεστώς και επικυρώνουν το σφαιρικό σύστημα από το οποίο ωφελείται. Γίαυτό υπάρχουν τόσες πολλές σαφείς περιπτώσεις των μαζικής επικοινωνίας μέσων που ωθούν την προπαγάνδα εξ ονόματος των προϊσταμένων.

Το 2002 και το 2003, όταν προετοιμάζονταν η Μεγάλη Βρετανία και οι ΗΠΑ στον πόλεμο αμοιβών στο Ιράκ, η εφημερίδα ήλιων έδωσε τις σελίδες στην απαρίθμηση πώς τα υποτιθέμενα «όπλα του Σαντάμ Χουσεΐν μαζικής καταστροφής» θα μπορούσαν να χτυπήσουν τα βρετανικά στρατεύματα στην Κύπρο μέσα σε 45 λεπτά από την πυρκαγιά.

Είτε αγνόησε είτε επιτέθηκε στα αντιπολεμικά ενεργά στελέχη και αφίσες παρεχόμενος «υποστήριξη των αγοριών μας» για τους αναγνώστες στην επίδειξη στα παράθυρά τους.

But media bias towards the ruling class can also be seen in less extreme times. After the National Union of Teachers (NUT) conference earlier this year sections of the media ran hysterical articles condemning the teachers’ decision to strike over pay and conditions.

The Daily Telegraph declared that it was “time to crush the NUT like the miners” – referring to the Miners’ Strike of 1984-85.

This bias goes wider than simply attacking strikers or building support for war. The mass media operates within an ideological framework that accepts and promotes the dominant ideas in society – such as the idea that capitalism is the only way to organise society.

The bias does not exist only in the openly right wing media, but also in media outlets that pride themselves on being “neutral” or “liberal”.

The Guardian newspaper recently ran a week-long series of articles on the global food crisis. This was presented as in-depth, serious analysis. Yet it reiterated some of the worst myths about the food crisis, myths that would rather blame the Chinese for eating too much meat than suggest there might be something wrong with the free market.

The revolutionaries Karl Marx and Frederick Engels wrote in the 19th century that “the ideas of the ruling class are in every epoch the ruling ideas”. But this doesn’t arise out of some kind of shady conspiracy within the ruling class.

It’s true that owners sometimes intervene directly in the running of their media franchises. Murdoch is well known for regularly intervening in the editorial decisions of the Sun newspaper.

In May this year Murdoch was asked if he had anything to do with the New York Post’s support for Barack Obama in the US Democratic presidential run off. He answered simply, “Yes.”

Assumptions

But for the most part owners rely on well-paid senior managers and editors who are closely tied to the capitalist class and so share their assumptions and ideas about the world.

If the mass media is owned by an elite that tries to use it to back up their system, how do we explain political differences in the message put out by different media outlets? The point here is that the ruling class is not a homogenous group. There are divisions within it – and the media reflects these.

The Daily Mirror’s stance in the run up to the Iraq war is a good example of this. It took an anti-war position in the context of divisions among the ruling class and an unprecedented mass movement against the war. So it reflected the fact that the ruling class was divided – but it also knew that there was an audience for an anti-war newspaper.

The profit motive can sometimes pull the mass media in different directions and make it appear that it is posing a challenge to the dominant ideology.

For instance, the Daily Mail has recently run several front pages on the rising cost of living in Britain. These rising costs are real. But the Daily Mail’s explanation for them is one that diverts people’s anger away from the bosses and towards immigrants.

Although the ruling class owns the mass media, it does not always completely control it.

The media needs workers to get produced in the first place. And media workers can and have refused to produce some of the worst excesses of racism and anti-union propaganda.

In 2006, workers at the Daily Star prevented the printing of an anti-Muslim page titled, “How Britain’s fave newspaper would look under Muslim rule.” Planned features included “Burqa Babes” and a “censored” editorial.

Workers in the National Union of Journalists called an emergency meeting and forced the Daily Star management to pull the page.

Similarly, during the Miners’ Strike printers at the Sun refused to print a front page of miners’ leader Arthur Scargill that made him look as if he was giving a Nazi salute.

How much notice do people really take of the mass media? It is certainly important as a major source of information and news for many people.

So it isn’t true to suggest that the media has no influence on people’s ideas. But the way our ideas are shaped by the media is much more complex than the simplistic “syringe” theory.

Our consciousness is shaped by our experiences of the world. Marx and Engels argued, “Consciousness does not determine life, but life consciousness.” People’s ideas are shaped by the material reality of their lives.

The majority of people that the mass media is sold and marketed to are working class. There is a huge gulf between the reality of their lives and the dominant ideology of capitalism. That gap can open up a space for that ideology to be questioned, challenged or rejected.

In the 1989 Hillsborough disaster, 96 people were killed after police allowed too many Liverpool football fans into overcrowded terraces.

The Sun newspaper ran a front page condemning the fans, claiming that they were drunken hooligans who stole from the dead. In fact the fans were key to helping the injured.

The scandal of the Sun’s coverage led to a boycott of the paper by newsagents across Liverpool. Sales plummeted and have never recovered. In 2004, the average circulation for the Sun in Liverpool was 12,000 copies a day – 200,000 less than before it printed the Hillsborough story.

Yet the dominant ideology remains and is promoted not just by the media, but by all of the major institutions in our society – including the education system and the legal system.

This leads to a situation where people hold contradictory ideas. People can have anti-immigrant opinions, but also support anti-deportation campaigns that involve someone they know personally.

Although people may reject obvious propaganda in the media, over time it can have an impact in generating racist or sexist assumptions. The mass media can reinforce backward ideas and it’s important that we challenge this.

But the mass media is not the fundamental reason why bigotry persists. Racism and sexism exist because of the kind of society that we live in.

Ideology

They form part of the dominant ideology of our society because the ruling class uses such ideas to divide and weaken the working class – and thereby preserve ruling class power.

Faced with ruling class bias in the mass media, many people turn to “alternative” sources of media. This is a positive development. Anti-war websites or other alternative media outlets can give people the facts and figures to argue their case with others. They can increase their understanding of the world and their confidence to fight back.

Revolutionaries have always seen producing socialist newspapers such as Socialist Worker as important.

But we recognise that these papers should do more than challenge the ideology of the ruling class – they should act as a tool for organising the struggle against the system.

The Russian revolutionary Lenin described the revolutionary paper as the “scaffolding” around which a revolutionary organisation is built. The scaffolding is clearly important. But it is there for a reason – to build up networks and organisation of people on the ground who can take on the system.

Research has found that the mass media has the biggest impact on those with no political affiliation. The mass media is most powerful when people are politically passive. Building resistance to capitalism can lead millions to question dominant ideas – and can see the power of that mass media melt away.

See More:UK News 

Have Your Say: How powerful is the mass media?
Please note, only selected comments will be published.

Or discuss this report in our new forums

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 18th, 2008 at 3:18 pm and is filed under Contributions & Guests, Media News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Afghanistan Alternative Energy Art BBC Big Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CIA Climate Change Cover Up Cults Culture Database State David Hicks David Ray Griffin Democrats Demos Drugs Education EU False Flag FBI Fraud Free Speech Freemasons G8 Globalization Guantanamo Health News History ID Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel Law Marches MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police State Propaganda RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spying Stephen Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony Blair Torture TV UK News UN USA News Video Voting Warfare White House Wolfowitz World News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version