Breaking News 突發新聞 | | Forum 論壇 | | UK News 英國新聞 | | USA News 美國新聞 | | World News 世界新聞 | | Political News 政治新聞 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新聞 | | War & Terrorism News 戰爭和恐怖主義新聞 | | Sports News 體育新聞 | | Multimedia 多媒體 | | Set Homepage 設為首頁

BREAKING NEWS 突發新聞

Friday, April 25th, 2008 週五， 2008年4月25日

IPA語言 |

The recent New York Times front-page article “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand” discloses Pentagon records which “reveal a symbiotic relationship where the usual dividing lines between government and journalism have been obliterated.最近紐約時報前線頁的文章“背後的電視分析家認為，五角大樓的隱藏的手”披露，五角大樓的紀錄“揭示了共生關係，而通常的分界線之間的政府和新聞已被湮沒。

“Internal Pentagon documents repeatedly refer to the military analysts [on TV] as ‘message force multipliers’ or ’surrogates’ who could be counted on to deliver administration ‘themes and messages’ to millions of Americans ‘in the form of their own opinions.’” “五角大樓的內部文件一再指以軍事分析家[對電視]作為'信息武力乘數'或'代理人'誰可以指望，以提供政府'的主題和郵件'數以百萬計的美國人在的形式，自己的意見。 “

PETER HART 彼得哈特
ISABEL MacDONALD 伊莎貝爾麥克唐納
Hart and MacDonald are with赫德和麥克唐納是與 FAIR 公平的 , the media watch group. ，媒體觀察組。 Hart said today: “This Pentagon propaganda operation took advantage of the corporate media’s long-standing preference for using retired military officials as ‘independent’ experts.赫德今天說： “這五角大樓的宣傳運作，利用公司的媒體的一貫偏好使用軍隊離退休官員作為'獨立'的專家。 The biggest scandal here is the media’s disgraceful conduct.最大的醜聞，這是媒體的可恥行為。 As the Times reported, the outlets showed little interest in monitoring the myriad conflicts of interest of their military analysts, many of whom worked off-camera to secure contracts for weapons manufacturers and corporations looking to do business with the US military.正如紐約時報報導，店鋪顯示，興趣不大，在監測的眾多利益衝突，他們的軍事分析家，其中許多工作小康相機，以確保合同的武器製造商和公司的期待去做生意與美軍。 Nor did the outlets seem interested in knowing how the analysts were getting their information about Iraq.也沒有出路似乎興趣知道，如何分析師們取得的資料，有關伊拉克。

“The Times also points out that some of these military analysts held back information about the Iraq insurgency and the search for Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. “紐約時報也指出，有些這些軍事分析家舉行的回的資料，對伊拉克的叛亂活動和搜尋伊拉克的大規模殺傷性武器。 In fact, one former Fox analyst recalls being briefed in 2003 that the US did not have ‘hard evidence’ of Iraq’s banned weapons.事實上，在一前福克斯分析師回顧正在向2003年說，美國沒有'確鑿證據'伊拉克的違禁武器。 The Pentagon pundits kept quiet about this.五角大樓的專家們噤若寒蟬這一點。 One wonders what would have happened if they hadn’t.” 1奇蹟，會是怎樣發生的事情，如果他們沒有“ 。

LORETTA ALPER 燕珍alper
Alper is the producer and co-director of “ alper是生產者和合作，主任“ War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death 戰爭變得容易：如何總統和學者保持紡紗我們死刑 ,” a documentary that spotlights the close working relationships between the Pentagon and major TV networks. “紀錄片的聚光燈密切的工作關係，五角大樓和主要電視網絡。 She said today: “I thought I was looking at a still from the ‘War Made Easy’ film when I picked up the Sunday New York Times .她今日說： “我以為我是看在一個仍然由'戰爭變得容易'電影，當我拿起了週日紐約時報 。 The so-called ‘hidden-hand’ of the Pentagon in shaping news coverage is nothing new.以所謂'隱藏手' ，五角大樓在形成新聞報導的是並無新意。 In the process of researching the film, we found ample evidence to make the case that much of the information about US military actions — from the Vietnam War to the present day — has been passed through the Pentagon spin machine before it comes to us as news.在這個過程中研究的電影，我們發現充分的證據，使案件的許多資料都對美國的軍事行動-從越南戰爭到現在的天-已通過五角大樓的自旋機之前，說到我們作為新聞。

“The network’s use of retired military personnel to provide on-air commentary is only a recent example of pro-war bias passing as independent, expert analysis. “網絡的使用已退休的軍事人員提供對空氣的評論，只是最近的一個例子，親戰爭的偏見，通過獨立，專家分析。 While the Times story was impressive in its investigative detail, it’s several years and many thousands of lives too late to sound the alarm about what we and many others have been saying for years — that the news media, including the New York Times , and the Pentagon double-teamed us on selling Bush’s war.”雖然紐約時報的故事，給人留下了深刻印象，在其調查詳細，它的好幾年，成千上萬人的生命為時已晚，警鐘長鳴什麼，我們和其他許多已說了多年-新聞媒體，包括N ewY orkT imes，和五角大樓的雙聯手，我們就出售布什的戰爭“ 。

NORMAN SOLOMON 諾曼所羅門
The documentary film “War Made Easy” is based on the book of the same name by Norman Solomon.該紀錄片的“戰爭變得容易”是基於這本書的名稱相同，由諾曼所羅門。 A字母a video section 錄像科 of the film that explores the Pentagon’s clearance of on-air CNN military analysts for coverage of the invasion of Iraq is available online.該影片探討五角大樓的間隙對空氣有線電視新聞網軍事分析家覆蓋入侵伊拉克是在網上提供。

An 1 article 文章 by Solomon about the response to the documentary from former CNN top news executive Eason Jordan is also available.由所羅門約的反應紀錄片由前有線電視新聞網頭條新聞行政陳奕迅約旦也已經推出。

Solomon is executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy.所羅門是行政研究所所長，為市民的準確性。

For further background, see FAIR’s “為進一步背景下，看到公平的“ 。 They Cannot Tell a Lie: Bush’s deceptions are not to be named 他們不能撒謊：布什的騙案，是不願透露姓名的 .” “ 。

The recent New York Times report stated:最近紐約時報的報導指出：
“Some analysts said that even before the war started, they privately had questions about the justification for the invasion, but were careful not to express them on air. “一些分析家說，即使在戰爭開始，他們私下存有疑問的理由入侵，但小心不要表達他們對空氣。

“Mr. “先生 Bevelacqua, then a Fox analyst, was among those invited to a briefing in early 2003 about Iraq’s purported stockpiles of illicit weapons. bevelacqua ，然後狐狸的分析師，是其中受邀介紹了在2003年年初對伊拉克的本意是儲存的非法武器。 He recalled asking the briefer whether the United States had ’smoking gun’ proof.他憶述，要求簡短的美國是否曾吸煙槍'的證據。

“‘”We don’t have any hard evidence,”‘ Mr. Bevelacqua recalled the briefer replying. “ ”我們沒有任何確鑿證據， “先生bevelacqua回顧了簡短的回答。 He said he and other analysts were alarmed by this concession.他說，他和其他分析師們感到震驚，這項寬減措施。 ‘We are looking at ourselves saying, “What are we doing?”‘ '我們正在尋找自己的話說： “什麼是我們在做什麼？ ”

“Another analyst, Robert L. Maginnis, a retired Army lieutenant colonel who works in the Pentagon for a military contractor, attended the same briefing and recalled feeling ‘very disappointed’ after being shown satellite photographs purporting to show bunkers associated with a hidden weapons program. “另一位分析師羅伯特研究maginnis ，已退休的陸軍中校誰工程，在五角大樓為軍事承包商，出席了相同的情況介紹和回顧的感覺'非常失望'後，顯示的衛星照片旨在顯示掩體與一個隱藏的武器計劃。 Mr. Maginnis said he concluded that the analysts were being ‘manipulated’ to convey a false sense of certainty about the evidence of the weapons. maginnis先生說，他得出結論認為，分析師被'操縱'傳達一種虛假的安全感肯定的證據武器。 Yet he and Mr. Bevelacqua and the other analysts who attended the briefing did not share any misgivings with the American public.然而，他和先生bevelacqua和其他分析家誰出席了發布會上不同意任何的疑慮與美國公眾。

“Mr. “先生 Bevelacqua and another Fox analyst, Mr. Cowan, had formed the wvc3 Group, and hoped to win military and national security contracts. bevelacqua和另一分析師福克斯先生， Cowan先生，已形成了wvc3組，並希望以贏得軍事和國家安全的合同。

“‘There’s no way I was going to go down that road and get completely torn apart,’ Mr. Bevelacqua said. “有沒有辦法我是去走這條路並取得完全四分五裂， '先生bevelacqua說。 ‘You’re talking about fighting a huge machine.’” '您談到打一場龐大的機器“ 。

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:如需詳細資訊，請聯絡該研究所為公眾的準確性：
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167山姆侯賽尼， （ 202 ） 347-0020 ;或大衛zupan ， （ 541 ） 484-9167

See More: 看到更多的： USA News 美國新聞

Have Your Say: Fallout from New York Times “Pentagon Pundits” Story 你說：塵來自新紐約時報“五角大樓專家”的故事
Please note, only selected comments will be published.請注意，只有選定的評論將出版。

Or discuss this report in our new forums 或討論這個報告在我們的新論壇

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Name (required) 姓名（必填）

Mail (will not be published) (required) 郵件（不會被公佈） （必填）

Website 網站

This entry was posted on Friday, April 25th, 2008 at 3:23 am and is filed under 此項目被張貼於週五， 2008年4月25日在上午03時23分，並提交下 Media News 新聞 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反應，此項目通過 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 餵養。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回應 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 從你自己的網站。

Loading ...載入中...

TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS top新聞討論

LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息討論

Activism & Protest News 積極與抗議新聞 | | Business News 商業新聞 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公務員＆人權新聞 | | Environmental News 環境新聞 | | Media News 新聞 | | Globalisation News 全球經濟一體化新聞 | | Web Development News Web開發新聞

ADVERTISEMENTS廣告

SITE MAPS網站地圖

7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative Energy替代能源 Art藝術 BBC英國廣播公司 Big Brother大哥哥 Bilderberg 。 Bilderberg Biometrics生物識別技術 Bush布什 CIA美國中央情報局 Climate Change氣候變化 Cover Up掩蓋 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database State數據庫狀態 David Hicks大衛希克斯 David Ray Griffin朱射線格里芬 Democrats同盟 Demos演示 Drugs藥物 Education教育 EU歐盟 False Flag虛假國旗 FBI美國聯邦調查局 Fraud欺詐 Free Speech免費的講話 Freemasons共濟會 G8八國集團 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo關塔那摩 Health News健康新聞 History歷史 ID Cards身份證 Internet互聯網 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 Law法律 Marches遊行 MI5軍情五處 MI6軍情六處 Microsoft微軟 Military軍事 MoD按付款當日價格計算 Money金錢 Music音樂 NASA美國航天局 Neocons新保守主義者 NSA美國國家安全局 Oil石油 Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police State警察國家 Propaganda宣傳 RFID的RFID RINF rinf Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲爾德 Science科學 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Space空間 Sports體育 Spying諜報活動 Stephen Lendman斯蒂芬lendman Technology技術 Terrorism恐怖主義 Tony Blair托尼布萊爾 Torture酷刑 TV電視 UK News英國新聞 UN聯合國 USA News美國新聞 Video視頻 Voting投票 Warfare戰 White House白宮 Wolfowitz沃爾福威茨 World News世界新聞 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003 -2 005檔案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年檔案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008檔案 | Current Archives目前檔案 | Past Version |過去的版本

About 大約 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 評語 | | Special Guests 特別來賓 | | Webmasters 網站管理員