Breaking News 突发新闻 | | Forum 论坛 | | UK News 英国新闻 | | USA News 美国新闻 | | World News 世界新闻 | | Political News 政治新闻 | | Sci-Tech News 科技新闻 | | War & Terrorism News 战争和恐怖主义新闻 | | Sports News 体育新闻 | | Multimedia 多媒体 | | Set Homepage 设为首页

BREAKING NEWS 突发新闻

Friday, April 25th, 2008 周五， 2008年4月25日

IPA语言 |

The recent New York Times front-page article “Behind TV Analysts, Pentagon’s Hidden Hand” discloses Pentagon records which “reveal a symbiotic relationship where the usual dividing lines between government and journalism have been obliterated.最近纽约时报前线页的文章“背后的电视分析家认为，五角大楼的隐藏的手”披露，五角大楼的纪录“揭示了共生关系，而通常的分界线之间的政府和新闻已被湮没。

“Internal Pentagon documents repeatedly refer to the military analysts [on TV] as ‘message force multipliers’ or ’surrogates’ who could be counted on to deliver administration ‘themes and messages’ to millions of Americans ‘in the form of their own opinions.’” “五角大楼的内部文件一再指以军事分析家[对电视]作为'信息武力乘数'或'代理人'谁可以指望，以提供政府'的主题和邮件'数以百万计的美国人在的形式，自己的意见。 “

PETER HART 彼得哈特
ISABEL MacDONALD 伊莎贝尔麦克唐纳
Hart and MacDonald are with赫德和麦克唐纳是与 FAIR 公平的 , the media watch group. ，媒体观察组。 Hart said today: “This Pentagon propaganda operation took advantage of the corporate media’s long-standing preference for using retired military officials as ‘independent’ experts.赫德今天说： “这五角大楼的宣传运作，利用公司的媒体的一贯偏好使用军队离退休官员作为'独立'的专家。 The biggest scandal here is the media’s disgraceful conduct.最大的丑闻，这是媒体的可耻行为。 As the Times reported, the outlets showed little interest in monitoring the myriad conflicts of interest of their military analysts, many of whom worked off-camera to secure contracts for weapons manufacturers and corporations looking to do business with the US military.正如纽约时报报导，店铺显示，兴趣不大，在监测的众多利益冲突，他们的军事分析家，其中许多工作小康相机，以确保合同的武器制造商和公司的期待去做生意与美军。 Nor did the outlets seem interested in knowing how the analysts were getting their information about Iraq.也没有出路似乎兴趣知道，如何分析师们取得的资料，有关伊拉克。

“The Times also points out that some of these military analysts held back information about the Iraq insurgency and the search for Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction. “纽约时报也指出，有些这些军事分析家举行的回的资料，对伊拉克的叛乱活动和搜寻伊拉克的大规模杀伤性武器。 In fact, one former Fox analyst recalls being briefed in 2003 that the US did not have ‘hard evidence’ of Iraq’s banned weapons.事实上，在一前福克斯分析师回顾正在向2003年说，美国没有'确凿证据'伊拉克的违禁武器。 The Pentagon pundits kept quiet about this.五角大楼的专家们噤若寒蝉这一点。 One wonders what would have happened if they hadn’t.” 1奇迹，会是怎样发生的事情，如果他们没有“ 。

LORETTA ALPER 燕珍alper
Alper is the producer and co-director of “ alper是生产者和合作，主任“ War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death 战争变得容易：如何总统和学者保持纺纱我们死刑 ,” a documentary that spotlights the close working relationships between the Pentagon and major TV networks. “纪录片的聚光灯密切的工作关系，五角大楼和主要电视网络。 She said today: “I thought I was looking at a still from the ‘War Made Easy’ film when I picked up the Sunday New York Times .她今日说： “我以为我是看在一个仍然由'战争变得容易'电影，当我拿起了周日纽约时报 。 The so-called ‘hidden-hand’ of the Pentagon in shaping news coverage is nothing new.以所谓'隐藏手' ，五角大楼在形成新闻报道的是并无新意。 In the process of researching the film, we found ample evidence to make the case that much of the information about US military actions — from the Vietnam War to the present day — has been passed through the Pentagon spin machine before it comes to us as news.在这个过程中研究的电影，我们发现充分的证据，使案件的许多资料都对美国的军事行动-从越南战争到现在的天-已通过五角大楼的自旋机之前，说到我们作为新闻。

“The network’s use of retired military personnel to provide on-air commentary is only a recent example of pro-war bias passing as independent, expert analysis. “网络的使用已退休的军事人员提供对空气的评论，只是最近的一个例子，亲战争的偏见，通过独立，专家分析。 While the Times story was impressive in its investigative detail, it’s several years and many thousands of lives too late to sound the alarm about what we and many others have been saying for years — that the news media, including the New York Times , and the Pentagon double-teamed us on selling Bush’s war.”虽然纽约时报的故事，给人留下了深刻印象，在其调查详细，它的好几年，成千上万人的生命为时已晚，警钟长鸣什么，我们和其他许多已说了多年-新闻媒体，包括N ewY orkT imes，和五角大楼的双联手，我们就出售布什的战争“ 。

NORMAN SOLOMON 诺曼所罗门
The documentary film “War Made Easy” is based on the book of the same name by Norman Solomon.该纪录片的“战争变得容易”是基于这本书的名称相同，由诺曼所罗门。 A字母a video section 录像科 of the film that explores the Pentagon’s clearance of on-air CNN military analysts for coverage of the invasion of Iraq is available online.该影片探讨五角大楼的间隙对空气有线电视新闻网军事分析家覆盖入侵伊拉克是在网上提供。

An 1 article 文章 by Solomon about the response to the documentary from former CNN top news executive Eason Jordan is also available.由所罗门约的反应纪录片由前有线电视新闻网头条新闻行政陈奕迅约旦也已经推出。

Solomon is executive director of the Institute for Public Accuracy.所罗门是行政研究所所长，为市民的准确性。

For further background, see FAIR’s “为进一步背景下，看到公平的“ 。 They Cannot Tell a Lie: Bush’s deceptions are not to be named 他们不能撒谎：布什的骗案，是不愿透露姓名的 .” “ 。

The recent New York Times report stated:最近纽约时报的报导指出：
“Some analysts said that even before the war started, they privately had questions about the justification for the invasion, but were careful not to express them on air. “一些分析家说，即使在战争开始，他们私下存有疑问的理由入侵，但小心不要表达他们对空气。

“Mr. “先生 Bevelacqua, then a Fox analyst, was among those invited to a briefing in early 2003 about Iraq’s purported stockpiles of illicit weapons. bevelacqua ，然后狐狸的分析师，是其中受邀介绍了在2003年年初对伊拉克的本意是储存的非法武器。 He recalled asking the briefer whether the United States had ’smoking gun’ proof.他忆述，要求简短的美国是否曾吸烟枪'的证据。

“‘”We don’t have any hard evidence,”‘ Mr. Bevelacqua recalled the briefer replying. “ ”我们没有任何确凿证据， “先生bevelacqua回顾了简短的回答。 He said he and other analysts were alarmed by this concession.他说，他和其他分析师们感到震惊，这项宽减措施。 ‘We are looking at ourselves saying, “What are we doing?”‘ '我们正在寻找自己的话说： “什么是我们在做什么？ ”

“Another analyst, Robert L. Maginnis, a retired Army lieutenant colonel who works in the Pentagon for a military contractor, attended the same briefing and recalled feeling ‘very disappointed’ after being shown satellite photographs purporting to show bunkers associated with a hidden weapons program. “另一位分析师罗伯特研究maginnis ，已退休的陆军中校谁工程，在五角大楼为军事承包商，出席了相同的情况介绍和回顾的感觉'非常失望'后，显示的卫星照片旨在显示掩体与一个隐藏的武器计划。 Mr. Maginnis said he concluded that the analysts were being ‘manipulated’ to convey a false sense of certainty about the evidence of the weapons. maginnis先生说，他得出结论认为，分析师被'操纵'传达一种虚假的安全感肯定的证据武器。 Yet he and Mr. Bevelacqua and the other analysts who attended the briefing did not share any misgivings with the American public.然而，他和先生bevelacqua和其他分析家谁出席了发布会上不同意任何的疑虑与美国公众。

“Mr. “先生 Bevelacqua and another Fox analyst, Mr. Cowan, had formed the wvc3 Group, and hoped to win military and national security contracts. bevelacqua和另一分析师福克斯先生， Cowan先生，已形成了wvc3组，并希望以赢得军事和国家安全的合同。

“‘There’s no way I was going to go down that road and get completely torn apart,’ Mr. Bevelacqua said. “有没有办法我是去走这条路并取得完全四分五裂， '先生bevelacqua说。 ‘You’re talking about fighting a huge machine.’” '您谈到打一场庞大的机器“ 。

For more information, contact at the Institute for Public Accuracy:如需详细资讯，请联络该研究所为公众的准确性：
Sam Husseini, (202) 347-0020; or David Zupan, (541) 484-9167山姆侯赛尼， （ 202 ） 347-0020 ;或大卫zupan ， （ 541 ） 484-9167

See More: 看到更多的： USA News 美国新闻

Have Your Say: Fallout from New York Times “Pentagon Pundits” Story 你说：尘来自新纽约时报“五角大楼专家”的故事
Please note, only selected comments will be published.请注意，只有选定的评论将出版。

Or discuss this report in our new forums 或讨论这个报告在我们的新论坛

RSS 的RSS TrackBack URL 跟踪 RUI

Name (required) 姓名（必填）

Mail (will not be published) (required) 邮件（不会被公布） （必填）

Website 网站

This entry was posted on Friday, April 25th, 2008 at 3:23 am and is filed under 此项目被张贴于周五， 2008年4月25日在上午03时23分，并提交下 Media News 新闻 , ， General 一般 . 。 You can follow any responses to this entry through the 您可以按照任何的反应，此项目通过 RSS 2.0 2.0 feed. 喂养。 You can 您可以 leave a response 留下的回应 , or ，或 trackback Trackback跟踪 from your own site. 从你自己的网站。

Loading ...载入中...

TOP NEWS DISCUSSIONS top新闻讨论

LATEST NEWS DISCUSSIONS 最新消息讨论

Activism & Protest News 积极与抗议新闻 | | Business News 商业新闻 | | Civil & Human Rights News 公务员＆人权新闻 | | Environmental News 环境新闻 | | Media News 新闻 | | Globalisation News 全球经济一体化新闻 | | Web Development News Web开发新闻

ADVERTISEMENTS广告

SITE MAPS网站地图

7/7 7 / 7 Afghanistan阿富汗 Alternative Energy替代能源 Art艺术 BBC英国广播公司 Big Brother大哥哥 Bilderberg 。 Bilderberg Biometrics生物识别技术 Bush布什 CIA美国中央情报局 Climate Change气候变化 Cover Up掩盖 Cults邪教 Culture文化 Database State数据库状态 David Hicks大卫希克斯 David Ray Griffin朱射线格里芬 Democrats同盟 Demos演示 Drugs药物 Education教育 EU欧盟 False Flag虚假国旗 FBI美国联邦调查局 Fraud欺诈 Free Speech免费的讲话 Freemasons共济会 G8八国集团 Globalization全球化 Guantanamo关塔那摩 Health News健康新闻 History历史 ID Cards身份证 Internet互联网 Iran伊朗 Iraq伊拉克 Israel以色列 Law法律 Marches游行 MI5军情五处 MI6军情六处 Microsoft微软 Military军事 MoD按付款当日价格计算 Money金钱 Music音乐 NASA美国航天局 Neocons新保守主义者 NSA美国国家安全局 Oil石油 Pakistan巴基斯坦 Podcast播客 Police State警察国家 Propaganda宣传 RFID的RFID RINF rinf Rumsfeld拉姆斯菲尔德 Science科学 Secrecy保密 Security安全 Space空间 Sports体育 Spying谍报活动 Stephen Lendman斯蒂芬lendman Technology技术 Terrorism恐怖主义 Tony Blair托尼布莱尔 Torture酷刑 TV电视 UK News英国新闻 UN联合国 USA News美国新闻 Video视频 Voting投票 Warfare战 White House白宫 Wolfowitz沃尔福威茨 World News世界新闻 Yahoo雅虎
2003 - 2005 Archives 2003 -2 005档案 | 2005 - 2007 Archives 2005年-2 007年档案 | 2007 - 2008 Archives 2007 -2 008档案 | Current Archives目前档案 | Past Version |过去的版本

About 大约 | | DVD Store DVD的商店 | | Opinion 民意 | | Reviews 评语 | | Special Guests 特别来宾 | | Webmasters 网站管理员