ºÎ½Ã ÇàÁ¤ºÎ´Â ÁÖÀÇ¿¡ $1.6 10¾ïÀ» ¾´´Ù
¿¡ ÀÇÇÏ¿© Å©¸®½ºÅäÆÛ ÀÌ
ÁÁÀº ¾Ð¹Ú °¡Ä¡´Â ¾ó¸¶Àΰ¡? ºÎ½Ã ÇàÁ¤ºÎ¿¡, ´ë·« $1.6 10¾ï.
Àú°ÍÀº 7°³ÀÇ ¿¬¹æºÎ°¡ °ø°ø °ü·Ã ȸ»ç, ±¤°í ȸ»ç, ¸Åü Á¶Á÷ ¹× °³Àΰú °¡Áø 343ÀÇ °è¾à¿¡ 2003¿¡¼ 2005³âÀÇ 2Çб⸦ ÅëÇØ¼ ¾´Áö ¾ó¸¶ÀÌ´Ù »õ·Î¿î Á¤ºÎ ÃⳳåÀÓ »ç¹«½Ç º¸°í¿¡ µû¸£¸é.
154 ÆäÀÌÁö º¸°í´Â ³»¿ëÀÌ Ç³ºÎÇÑ ³íÀïÀ» À۳⿡ »ý¼ºÇÑ Áö¿ª¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ¿¬¹æ ÁöÃâÀÇ ¹üÀ§¿¡ Æ÷°ýÀûÀÎ º¸±â¸¦ ÇöÀç±îÁö Á¦°øÇÑ´Ù. Congressional Democrats asked the GAO to look into federal public relations contracts last spring at the height of the furor over government-sponsored prepackaged news and journalism-for-sale.
Armstrong Williams, the conservative commentator, had been unmasked as a paid administration promoter who received $186,000 from the Education Department to speak favorably about President Bush¡¯s No Child Left Behind law in broadcast appearances.
Around the same time, a spat erupted between the GAO and the White House over whether the government¡¯s practice of feeding TV stations prepackaged, ready-to-air news stories that touted administration policies (but did not disclose the government as the source) amounted to ¡°covert propaganda.¡± The GAO said that it did. The administration disagreed, saying spreading information about federal programs is part of the agencies¡¯ mission, and that the burden of disclosure falls on the TV stations.
Congress sided with the GAO. Lawmakers inserted a provision into an annual spending bill requiring federal agencies to include ¡°a clear notification¡± within the text or audio of a prepackaged news story that it was prepared or paid for by the government.
The new report reveals that federal public relations spending goes far beyond ¡°video news releases.¡± The contracts covered the waterfront, from a $6.3 million agreement to help the Department of Homeland Security educate Americans about how to respond to terrorist attacks; to a $647,350 contract to assist the Transportation Security Administration in producing video news releases and media tours on the subject of airport security procedures; to a $6,600 contract to train managers at the Bureau of Reclamation in dealing with the media.
¡°Careful oversight of this spending is essential given the track record of the Bush administration, which has used taxpayer dollars to fund covert propaganda within the United States,¡± Rep. Henry A. Waxman (Calif.), ranking Democrat of the House Government Reform Committee, said in a statement yesterday.
Bush Section has more related reportsHelp keep RINF going..Comment on 'Bush Administration Spends $1.6 Billion On Propaganda' :
One Response to ¡°Bush Administration Spends $1.6 Billion On Propaganda¡±
-
pingback:
Posted: Aug 15th, 2007 at 10:53 pm | Link to this
Bush Administration Spends $1.6 Billion On Propaganda « Aftermath News
Related News:














¼±Àû¡¦














[¡¦] RINF | Aug 15, 2007 [¡¦]