Wednesday, March 11th, 2009
More than 1,000 serving police officers in Britain have criminal records, figures obtained under freedom of information laws showed on Wednesday.
Convictions of the 1,063 officers include 77 for violence, 36 for theft and 96 for dishonesty.
Five of these officers were reinstated by the Home Office after being sacked by their local forces.
More than half the convictions were for speeding, drink-driving or other motoring offences, according to the figures obtained by the Liberal Democrats from 41 of Britain’s 52 police forces.
Another 210 officers have been dismissed or been required to resign in the past five years because of their criminal convictions.
Liberal Democrat Home Affairs Spokesman Chris Huhne said officers convicted of violence or dishonesty should be dismissed immediately.
“A serving police officer is expected by members of the public to be self controlled and self restrained in the use of force,” Huhne told BBC television.
“If there is dishonesty, police offices can’t actually do their duty in giving evidence … the defence would completely shred their credibility in court.”
The Association of Chief Police Officers said there were more than 140,000 officers in Britain and that it was very rare for anyone with a criminal conviction to be recruited.
“The police service expects good conduct and probity from its officers and staff at all times,” said Greater Manchester Police Chief Constable Peter Fahy.
“Where wrongdoing is alleged, police officers are investigated and action taken as appropriate to each case.”
Have Your Say:
More than 1,000 UK police have criminal records
Please read our
posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively
you can discuss this report in our forum .
RSS TrackBack URL
Related News
This entry was posted
on
Wednesday, March 11th, 2009 at
5:57 pm and is filed under
Latest News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the
RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
One could not fail to notice there were Zero Murderers - is that due to the fact they don’t bother to prosecute those because it would look bad if found guilty of shooting a chap in the head five times, one second apart with DUM DUM bullets?