23rd November 2014                                                                                                                                                        
Home / Breaking News / Court Rules No Suspicion Needed for Laptop Searches at Border
Thumbnail for 102361

Court Rules No Suspicion Needed for Laptop Searches at Border

RINF Alternative News

BROOKLYN – A federal court today dismissed a lawsuit arguing that the government should not be able to search and copy people’s laptops, cell phones, and other devices at border checkpoints without reasonable suspicion. An appeal is being considered. Government documents show that thousands of innocent American citizens are searched when they return from trips abroad.

“We’re disappointed in today’s decision, which allows the government to conduct intrusive searches of Americans’ laptops and other electronics at the border without any suspicion that those devices contain evidence of wrongdoing,” said Catherine Crump, the American Civil Liberties Union attorney who argued the case in July 2011. “Suspicionless searches of devices containing vast amounts of personal information cannot meet the standard set by the Fourth Amendment, which prohibits unreasonable searches and seizures. Unfortunately, these searches are part of a broader pattern of aggressive government surveillance that collects information on too many innocent people, under lax standards, and without adequate oversight.”

The ACLU, the New York Civil Liberties Union, and the National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers filed the lawsuit in September 2010 against the Department of Homeland Security. DHS asserts the right to look though the contents of a traveler’s electronic devices, and to keep the devices or copy the contents in order to continue searching them once the traveler has been allowed to enter the U.S., regardless of whether the traveler is suspected of any wrongdoing.

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Pascal Abidor, a dual French-American citizen who had his laptop searched and confiscated at the Canadian border; the National Press Photographers Association, whose members include television and still photographers, editors, students and representatives of the photojournalism industry; and the NACDL, which has attorney members in 25 countries.

Abidor was travelling from Montreal to New York on an Amtrak train in May 2010 when he had his laptop searched and confiscated by customs officers. Abidor, an Islamic Studies Ph.D. student at McGill University, was questioned, taken off the train in handcuffs, and held in a cell for several hours before being released without charge. When his laptop was returned 11 days later, there was evidence that many of his personal files had been searched, including photos and chats with his girlfriend.

In June, in response to an ACLU Freedom of Information Act request, DHS released its December 2011 Civil Rights/Civil Liberties Impact Assessment of its electronics search policy, concluding that suspicionless searches do not violate the First or Fourth Amendments. The report said that a reasonable suspicion standard is inadvisable because it could lead to litigation and the forced divulgence of national security information, and would prevent border officers from acting on inchoate “hunches,” a method that it says has sometimes proved fruitful.

Today’s ruling is available at:
aclu.org/sites/default/files/assets/abidor_decision.pdf

  • http://usurykills.blogspot.com usurykills

    Time for a new constitutional convention. Time to clear up the law.

    Methinks “people” means all people, everywhere and at all times.

    The so-called “judge” is flat wrong. The 4th amendment is one of the clearer ones. Need a witness and a warrant describing the particular items to be searched for.

    The real terrorists are the criminals usurpers ruining the government.

  • desertspeaks

    another CRIMINAL JUDGE who breaches his oath of office!
    PUT ALL POLITICIANS AND JUDGES IN PRISON! EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM IS GUILTY OF BREACH OF THEIR OATHS OF OFFICE to protect, defend and support the constitution!

  • Dave

    Sounds like folks need to keep a cheap ass laptop and phone with junk on them for those types of situations and their private data etc on a laptop and phone they post or courier forward to the destination to avoid this invasion of privacy, not perfect but until the judges start upholding the law it is at least one way to fuck with them, let them look through ours of cat pages and zit popping videos. Or bore the shit out of them with huge files full of accounting problems to be solved or endless pages of poetry or greeting card level sonnets and junk fiction like Mills and Boon.

Why RINF is different... And why you need to watch this...

RINF not only delivers the info you're not supposed to know, but also provides 100% free solution based videos and articles designed to help you to :

  • Improve your overall health
  • Get more financial independence
  • Stay informed & ahead of the curve
  • Become less dependent on corporations