White House Censors Civil Liberties Report白宮檢查員民權報告
Larisa Alexandrovna larisa alexandrovna
We are fighting the war on terror, so, not only are civil liberties any longer relevant but neither is any report on civil liberties being violated relevant.我們是在打擊反恐戰爭，所以，不僅是公民自由的任何較長有關，但也不是任何報告，對公民自由受到侵犯有關。 After all, if you do not know that you have no rights, you won’t complain all that much, see?畢竟，如果你不知道你有沒有權利，你會不會抱怨都多，見？ From從 ACLU 美國公民自由聯盟 : ：
“Washington, DC - The American Civil Liberties Union today ridiculed White House censoring of a report submitted by the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board to exclude previously released information. "華盛頓哥倫比亞特區-美國公民自由聯盟今天嘲諷白宮審查的一份報告所提出的隱私和公民自由監督委員會以排除以前發布的信息。 The White House made more than 200 redactions to the public report, sometimes deleting entire sections. 白宮作了200多節錄向公眾報告，有時刪去整個章節。 These edits resulted in former White House Counsel Lanny J. Davis’s resignation. 這些搜索結果是前白宮律師lanny j.戴維斯奇摩辭職。
The following can be attributed to Caroline Fredrickson, Director of the ACLU Washington Legislative Office: 以下可以歸因於迪克森署長美國民權聯盟華盛頓法律辦公室主任：
“This administration has taken a see-no-evil, speak-no-evil posture. "本屆政府已經採取了見-不惡，說話不作惡的姿態。 Attempting to keep well-known civil liberties violations secret is nothing short of childish. 企圖保持著名的民權侵犯秘密是絕對不會缺少幼稚。 We clearly see what the administration is trying to hide when White House staff made 200 redactions and edits to the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board’s report. 我們清醒地看到，什麼政府當局正試圖隱藏時，白宮工作人員作出了200節錄和編輯到隱私和公民自由監督委員會的報告。 The board is a toothless entity that blindly and obediently advances the Bush agenda by endorsing its most egregious civil liberties violations. 該委員會是一個無牙實體盲目乖乖地進步了布希政府所贊同其最令人震驚的公民自由的侵犯。 For the administration to take it one step further by censoring the PCLOB’s report is shameless. 對於政府是否可以更進一步，指責pclob的報告是可恥。
“Representatives Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Christopher Shays (R-CT) and Tom Udall (D-NM), have introduced legislation which would take the civil liberties board out from under the president’s control and would give it subpoena powers. "代表卡羅琳馬洛尼（四-紐約州） ，克里斯托弗夏斯（ - ）和湯姆udall （四奈米） ，都已制訂法例，其中將考慮公民自由理事會脫離總統控制，並會給予它發出傳票的權力。 We strongly support that necessary move to ensure that the board has true oversight powers - and can be a watch dog, not a lap dog.” 我們堅決支持這項必要的舉措，以確保董事會真有監督的權力-可以成為一種觀賞狗，而不是一個圈狗" 。
Make no mistake, this is a direct assault on freedom of the press, on freedom of expression, on the Bill of Rights in general.不要搞錯，這是一個直接打擊新聞自由，表達自由，對人權法案的一般問題。 Maybe Congress should meet with Lanny J. Davis and ask about those 200 redactions?也許國會應該滿足與lanny j.戴維斯，並詢問那些200節錄？
White House 白宮 Section has more related reports 科更多相關報導 Help keep RINF going..有利於保持rinf去..Comment on 'White House Censors Civil Liberties Report' : 評論'白宮檢查員民權報告' ：
Related News: 相關新聞：
