|
|
Übersetzen Sie:
              Schicksal von Guant? namo Häftlinge noch düster
Mittwoch, den 14. Januar 2009
Durch William Fisher | Gruppen der menschlichen Rechte hageln Reports dieser Pläne des gewählten Präsidenten Barack Obama, um eine Ausführungsverordnung an seinem ersten vollen Tag im Büro herauszugeben, welches das Schließen des Guant verweist? namo Bucht-Internierungslager in Kuba. Aber sie drängen ihn, Details auf zur Verfügung zu stellen wenn und wie es getan wird und was geschehen denen, die jetzt dort eingesperrt werden. In einem Teleconference Dienstag mit Reportern, würde Caroline Frederickson, der gesetzgebende hauptsächlichrepräsentant des amerikanischen Zivilfreiheit-Anschlußes (ACLU), besagtes schließendes Gitmo wenig bedeuten, wenn Häftlinge einfach auf etwas andere Position verschoben wurden. Sie sagte auch, daß sie Versicherung benötigte, daß die Obama Leitung würde nicht vorschlagen ein System „der vorbeugenden Verzögerung.“ „Es ist nicht genug, zum von Guant einfach zu schließen? namo oder sogar die militärischen Kommission Versuche zu verschieben, die z.Z. dort,“ sie stattfinden, sagte. Sie ersuchte um Kongreß, die militärische Kommissionen Tat von 2006, die dem Präsidenten Berechtigung, um gab Leute zurückzuhalten, einschließlich US zu widerrufen Bürger, unbestimmt ohne Aufladungen oder Versuche. Deborah Colson des Gesetz-und Sicherheit Programms der zugelassenen Befürwortung gruppieren menschliche Rechte zuerst (HRF) erklärte IPS dieses schließende Guant? namo Wille „Erscheinen die Welt sind wir ernst über unsere Werte.“ Aber, sie fügte, es „erfordert das Umfassen der Zeit-geprüften Verfahren für kriminelle Verfolgung der vermuteten Terroristen in unseren Bundesgerichtshöfen.“ hinzu Schließendes Guant? namo ist unwahrscheinlich, schnell durchgeführt zu werden. Ein Beamter der Obama übergang Mannschaft sagte angeblich, daß es einige Monate dauern, um einige der restlichen 248 Gefangenen auf andere Länder zu bringen, entscheidet würde, wie man Verdächtige versucht und die vielen anderen zugelassenen Herausforderungen beschäftigt, die indem sie das Lager aufgeworfen wurden, schloß. Jedoch haben übergang Beamte gesagt, daß Obama an der Einrichtung einer sofortigen Aufhebung George W. festgelegt wird Militär der Bush Leitung beauftragt System für versuchende Häftlinge. Zusätzlich hat die ankommende Leitung angeblich einen Antrag zurückgewiesen, um eine autorisierende unbestimmte Verzögerung des neuen Gesetzes innerhalb der Vereinigten Staaten zu suchen. Die Bush Leitung hatte beharrt, daß solch ein Maß notwendig war, um das Guant zu schließen? namo Lager und holen einige der Häftlinge in die US Unterdessen fährt das Schicksal einer Anzahl von Gitmo Häftlingen fort, heraus in den Gerichten zu spielen. Am Dienstag ordnete das ACLU eine Petition für habeas Korpus im Bundesgerichtshof in Washington ein, schwierig die Verzögerung von Mohamed Jawad, der bei Guant gehalten worden ist? namo für mehr als sechs Jahre. Jawad, now about 23 years old, was captured at the age of 16 or 17 and is one of two Guant?namo prisoners the U.S. is prosecuting for acts allegedly committed when they were juveniles. He is accused of throwing a hand grenade at two U.S. service members and their interpreter in Afghanistan. “It would be a miscarriage of justice for President-elect Obama to continue Mr. Jawad’s unlawful detention in Guant?namo, particularly considering that Mr. Jawad was captured as a teenager and detained based on alleged confessions obtained through torture,” said Hina Shamsi, an ACLU attorney. “The Bush administration compounded this injustice by using torture-derived evidence to prosecute Mr. Jawad for war crimes in the unconstitutional military commissions. The government’s continued detention and prosecution of Mr. Jawad violates America’s values and the Constitution, as well as this country’s binding obligations under the Geneva Conventions and human rights law,” she said. In September, the military’s prosecutor resigned from the military commissions because he did not believe he could ethically proceed with the case. He told the court there was “no credible evidence or legal basis” to justify Jawad’s detention and prosecution, and that the commission system’s flaws make it impossible for anyone “to harbor the remotest hope that justice is an achievable goal.” A month later, Army judge Col. Stephen Henley held that evidence collected while Jawad was in U.S. custody could not be admitted in his trial because it had been obtained under duress. Among various forms of abusive treatment, Jawad was a victim of the military’s so-called “frequent flyer” program, in which detainees at Guant?namo were subjected to sleep deprivation for extended periods of time. In May 2004, a few months after Jawad tried to commit suicide in his cell, prison officials deprived him of sleep for two weeks by moving him 112 times in 14 days ? after having been ordered by their commanding general to discontinue this practice. The government told the judge that Jawad’s alleged confessions were the centerpiece of its case against him. “The fact that the government persists in trying to use evidence obtained through torture says everything you need to know about the integrity of its case,” said U.S. Air Force Major David J. R. Frakt, who represents Jawad. The Bush administration is appealing the Guant?namo military judge’s decision to throw out the “tainted” evidence. In a separate case, the trial of another “child soldier,” Canadian citizen Omar Ahmed Khadr, is scheduled to begin Jan. 26. Khadr was captured by U.S. forces when he was 15, following a four-hour firefight with militants in a village in Afghanistan. He has spent six years in Guant?namo charged with war crimes and providing support to terrorism after allegedly throwing a grenade that killed a U.S. soldier. But in February of 2008, the Pentagon accidentally released documents that revealed that while Khadr was present during the firefight, there was no evidence that he had thrown the grenade. In fact, military officials had originally reported that another militant had thrown the grenade just before being killed. HRF’s Deborah Colson told IPS that Obama’s plan to close Gitmo will be further complicated if he “does not make an immediate decision to suspend all military commission proceedings, including the trial of Omar Khadr.” Among the many complications surrounding the closing of Guant?namo is the question of what to do with detainees the U.S. government has cleared for release. In December 2008, the government attempted to halt the cases of approximately 20 detainees the Defense Department had cleared for transfer out of Guant?namo. A few weeks later, a federal court rejected the government’s action. The ruling, from Judge Thomas Hogan of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, meant that lawyers for the detainees could go forward with attempting to seek their release from detention. As recognized by the Supreme Court and by District Court Judge Ricardo Urbina in the case involving 17 Chinese Muslims ? known as Uighurs ? remaining at Guant?namo, a core facet of the fundamental right of habeas is the ability of a federal court to order release in cases of unlawful detention. Judge Urbina ruled the Uighurs should be released from Guant?namo and admitted into the U.S. The government is appealing that decision. “An administrative order that says that they are free to go is not relief after seven years of imprisonment,” says Emi MacLean, an attorney with the Center for Constitutional Rights. “These men need to be released from prison, and this relief is long overdue.” There are approximately 50-60 detainees at Guant?namo who cannot be sent to their home countries for fear of torture or persecution or because of statelessness. These include the 17 Uighurs from China as well as men from Azerbaijan, Algeria, Libya, Palestine, Russia, Syria, Tajikistan, Tunisia, and Uzbekistan. Have Your Say: Fate of Guant?namo Detainees Still Murky Please read our posting guidelines before posting. Alternatively you can discuss this report here. Related News
|
Prince Harry video nasty that will spark outrage Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 09:19 AM Go to Forum
| Latest Topics
Labour MPs rail against mail betrayal Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 09:13 AM 2012: Illegal CCTV Last post by Unregistered @ 08:45 AM Israeli forces have killed more than 1,000 Palestinians in Gaza Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 07:51 AM Gaza: Facts and Analysis ? By Any Means Necessary Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 06:29 AM RULING-CLASS ideology turns workers into shirkers and civilians into 'our enemies,' Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 06:26 AM KEITH FLETT looks back at 1969's tumultuous events in Northern Ireland. Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 06:18 AM Judging the judges Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 06:14 AM Bush cronies rewarded for warmongering Last post by Thinking Man's Idiot @ 06:08 AM Guide to Anti-Communism Last post by Boris The Bullet Dodger @ 01:28 AM  Email This Page To A Friend Latest Headlines
More World News  Archive
|
The views expressed in the RINF news wire and newsletter are the sole responsibility of the author (s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the webmaster. RINF.COM: Breaking News & Alternative Media is Copyleft - Copy & Distribute Freely. News Forum |
Loading ...
