BREAKING: Discover How A Slacker Makes $100,000 A Year!

WEBMASTERS! Get Your Website To The Top Of Google

Malaysian-Indians becoming victims of slavery

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

KUALA LUMPUR: Many illiterate ethnic Indians in Malaysia are falling prey to scams by organized syndicates who lure them with well-paying jobs and later treat them like slaves, a leading daily here reported on Saturday.

Wanting a better life for their family and eager to escape the grip of poverty, many ethnic Indians fall victim to the scam which has been kept under close wraps by syndicates, the New Straits Times said in a report from Malacca.

One of the victims, M Nadarajah, 47, said the syndicate members were like “thugs, who exerted force to instil fear so that we dare not go against them.” He alleged that he and some others victims were abused verbally and physically.

Nadarajah said his captor had also threatened to sell his children, especially his two girls, if he escaped, the paper reported.

The newspaper, however, did not give any details of how many victims were lured by the syndicate. There was also no mention of any action by the police.

Have Your Say: Malaysian-Indians becoming victims of slavery
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Amnesty requests UN to release Sri Lankan civilian death toll

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

Have Your Say: Amnesty requests UN to release Sri Lankan civilian death toll
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

US cybersecurity plan poses new war threats

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

By Tom Eley |

President Barack Obama announced on Friday the creation of a new “cyber czar” position. The Cybersecurity Coordinator, who is yet to be named, would oversee billions of dollars in funding for developing and coordinating defense of the computer networks that operate the global financial system and domestic transportation and commerce, according to the administration. The position, which Obama said would report directly to him, results from a 60-day “cyberspace policy review” Obama ordered.

Obama’s announcement was overshadowed by the US military’s imminent creation of a new military “Cyber Command,” detailed in a New York Times article published Friday. Obama has not even been presented with the military’s plan, nor did he mention it directly in his press conference. However, administration sources have said he will sign a classified order or set of directives later this month authorizing the creation of the Cyber Command.

Media accounts indicate that the formation of the parallel domestic and military cyber security agencies was the source of a bitter “turf battle” between and within competing national security and federal domestic agencies.

As a compromise, Obama’s domestic Cybersecurity Coordinator would report to both the National Economic Council (NEC), a White House economic advisory group, and the National Security Council, the top-level presidential advisory group that coordinates foreign and military policy, thus ensuring “a balance between homeland security and economic concerns,” the Washington Post reports. Obama’s top economic advisor, Lawrence H. Summers, fought for a dominant role for the NEC so that “efforts to protect private networks do not unduly threaten economic growth.”

In his Friday press conference, Obama sought to present the Cybersecurity Coordinator position in the most innocuous terms, referring to the “spyware and malware and spoofing and phishing and botnets.” and “cyber thieves” that anyone with access to the Internet confronts. Obama emphasized that the measure would not include “monitoring private sector networks or Internet traffic. We will preserve and protect the personal privacy and civil liberties that we cherish as Americans,” he said. “Indeed, I remain firmly committed to net neutrality so we can keep the Internet as it should be—open and free.”

But the creation of high-level police agency tasked with overseeing the Internet raises troubling questions. As the New York Times notes, it “appears to be part of a significant expansion of the role of the national security apparatus” in the White House.

Meanwhile, legislation working its way through Congress, the so-called Cybersecurity Act of 2009, would grant the US government unprecedented control over the Internet. The bill gives the president unrestricted power to halt Internet traffic, ordering the shutdown of both government and privately owned and operated networks deemed related to “critical infrastructure information systems,” merely by declaring a “cybersecurity emergency.”

In his remarks, Obama pointed to the threat of cyber terrorism, noting that US “defense and military networks are under constant attack. Al Qaeda and other terrorist groups have spoken of their desire to unleash a cyber attack on our country.” He invoked the recent terror attacks on Mumbai, India, where “terrorists…relied not only on guns and grenades but also on GPS and phones using voice-over-the-Internet.” Obama also alluded to the possibility of cyberwarfare with a major foe, mentioning Russia by name. “Last year we had a glimpse of the future face of war,” Obama said. “As Russian tanks rolled into Georgia, cyber attacks crippled Georgian government websites.”

However, these sorts of threats would most likely not fall under the purview of the Cybersecurity Coordinator, at least based on Obama’s explanation of the position. The implication is that these “threats” would be handled by the military-intelligence Cyber Command.

Reports indicate that there is an acrimonious struggle within the national security apparatus over who should oversee the new command. Currently, the National Security Agency (NSA) controls most of the functions that would be associated with cyberwarfare. Created by Democratic President Harry S. Truman in 1952 at the height of the Cold War, the NSA is a spy agency tasked with breaking the codes and signals of foreign entities and encrypting sensitive US government communications. It is overseen by a military figure—either a lieutenant general or vice admiral—and the NSA reports to the Department of Defense.

In March, Rod Beckstrom, the Department of Homeland Security’s cyber-security head (Director, National Cybersecurity Center) resigned in protest over the NSA appearing to win out in the struggle over who should “defend” domestic computer networks. In his resignation letter, which was leaked to the press, Beckstrom implied that the Office of Management and Budget had conspired with the NSA to starve his own agency of funding, and raised the threat posed by the NSA overseeing domestic computer-spying operations. “The threat to our democratic processes are significant if all top government network security and monitoring are handled by any one organization (either directly or indirectly),” Beckstrom wrote. “During my term as director we have been unwilling to subjugate the NSCS underneath the NSA.”

A Wall Street Journal report at the end of April indicated that the head of the Cyber Command would be current NSA chief, General Keith Alexander. Other accounts indicate that the Cyber Command would more likely report at first to the military’s Strategic Command, which oversees the nation’s nuclear arsenal, according to sources cited in the New York Times. And still other sources have said NSA personnel could be moved into a new military command structure under the control of the Pentagon.

In any case, the formation of the Cyber Command raises the threat of the military or the NSA launching operations within the US. Both are currently constitutionally-prohibited from carrying on either military or spy actions within American borders. One anonymous “senior intelligence official,” cited in the Times, called this “the domestic spying problem writ large.”

“These attacks start in other countries, but they know no borders,” he said. “So how do you fight them if you can’t act both inside and outside the United States?” The answer, implied by the very formation of the Cyber Command, is that the military and spy agencies should disregard the traditional separation of foreign war and espionage, on the one hand, and domestic policing and investigation, on the other.

According to the Defense Department, in 2008 360 million attempts were made to breach its computer networks. It also reported that the Pentagon spent $100 million in the past six months to repair damage done by hackers, most of whom work from Russia and China, it is claimed. In early April the Wall Street Journal reported that hackers had penetrated the national electricity grid and even the Pentagon’s $300 billion Joint Strike Fighters program.

Yet despite the rhetoric about national defense, comments from administration sources and military figures make clear that motivating the creations of the military cyber defense is its offensive capabilities. “We are not comfortable discussing the question of offensive cyberoperations, but we consider cyberspace a war-fighting domain,” said Bryan Whitman, an Obama Pentagon spokesman. “We need to be able to operate within that domain just like on any battlefield, which includes protecting our freedom of movement and preserving our capability to perform in that environment.”

Have Your Say: US cybersecurity plan poses new war threats
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

SEO Training Course Reveals New Secrets

Saturday, May 30th, 2009

BECOME AN SEO GURU IN HOURS!
JUST $27 PER MONTH

Since the demand in SEO (Search Engine Optimization) has increased by almost 10 fold in the past 12 months, so also has the demand for high quality SEO training courses.

All novices can pick up basic tactics like the use of title and meta data in their pages but the more advanced methods are rarely, if ever, made public.

Even intermediate knowledge such as keyword proximity and density can be easily researched via the internet, but what is never spoken about, at least freely on Internet forums and PDF sheets, is the real nuts and bolds of what makes a search engine like Google tick.

Armed with this elite knowledge, anyone, no matter what their technical ability, can engineer any website from zero to hero in a matter of minutes; dominating the search engines and pulling the traffic (and profits) that makes such valuable information pay for itself within days.

For example, little is known about the Google algorithms, there is much speculation from those who think they know these lucrative insider secrets, but even what Google releases to the public about algorithms such as QDF is extremely limited.

So how does someone wishing to expand their SEO knowledge discover the ‘magic ingredients’?

The Google Front Page Supremacy video master class explains in detail every single factor search engines use in their ranking algorithms.

From complete novice to the most advanced and highly trained of SEO gurus, every single nut and bolt is covered, from basic keyword research right through to Growth Profiles, Clustering and Independent Peers.

No stone is left unturned. To gain instant access to all this knowledge, and be kept bang up to date about every search engine development subscribe below for the insane price of just $27 a month.

BECOME AN SEO GURU IN HOURS!
JUST $27 PER MONTH

Video courses with less information are currently retailing for £400, and do not include updates to keep you ahead of all other SEO’s. See what people are saying about this offer:

“10 years of full-time internet marketing and these videos still opened my eyes to whole new worlds of traffic. Now getting 6,000 visitors per hour to a site.” - Jon MacPherson of jonmacpherson.info

“People shouldn’t be able to get this type of information for such a low price.” - Daniel Molano of danielmolano.com

Try it for yourself

Have Your Say: SEO Training Course Reveals New Secrets
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Related News

• At least 30 reported killed as Indians protest oil and gas exploration in Peru
• FBI agents raid office protecting whistleblowers
• MI5 and MI6 to recruit more minority spies
• South African Police ‘rotten to the core’
• Hicks feared he would be shot: affidavit

This entry was posted on Saturday, May 30th, 2009 at 8:22 pm and is filed under Contributions & Guests . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.