BREAKING: Discover How A Slacker Makes $100,000 A Year!

WEBMASTERS! Get Your Website To The Top Of Google

The Surveillance Society report: DNA discussions

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

By Anthony Hildebrand | The report recognises the National DNA Database as a “valuable investigative tool, particularly in relation to police efforts to solve older cases”

“But the sensitive nature of the information which may be yielded by DNA heightens the degree of responsibility borne by the Government,” it says. “The Home Office must work with the National Policing Improvement Agency and the police to set and observe a regulatory framework which protects individuals from unnecessary invasions of privacy and loss or unauthorised use of their genetic material and information gleaned from it.

“The Home Office should actively support the NPIA in its efforts to reduce the rate of replication on the NDNAD. Inaccuracies in the information on the database must be corrected to enable the police and the public to reap the full benefit of the NDNAD.”

The report is in favour of the Government’s assurances that the National DNA Database won’t be used to “correlate particular genetic characteristics with propensity to commit crime” – genetic profiling, in other words.

“We recommend that the Home Office renew this assurance in conjunction with the Government’s conclusions on the review of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act,” the report says. “We recommend that the Home Office make public at the earliest stage any plans to revisit this issue. “

Transparency
It says that Government consultations on the issue should be transparent, and help to clarify “the purposes and processes of DNA collection and retention”.

“There have been calls for an expansion of the National DNA Database to include profiles connected with non-recordable offences and for a ‘universal database’ and for the Government to reconsider its policy on retaining the profiles of those who have been arrested but not charged,” the report says.

“In order to facilitate a full debate and an appropriate level of Parliamentary scrutiny we recommend that alongside any conclusions of the PACE review the Government introduce primary legislation to replace the current regulatory framework for the National DNA Database. We recommend that this legislation provide for a more accessible mechanism by which individuals can challenge the decision to retain their records on the Database.

“The Government should reconsider the ways in which National DNA database information is collected, handled stored and transferred,” it continues.

“In particular we recommend that in order to minimise the data held, the Home Office and the police should review the identifiers used for samples and the policy of retaining samples.”

Have Your Say: The Surveillance Society report: DNA discussions
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Are we losing our civil liberties?

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Are we losing our civil liberties?
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Commons report: British “surveillance society”

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Commons report: British “surveillance society”
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Our Government’s Dirty Little Secrets

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Our Government’s Dirty Little Secrets
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Change, What Change?

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Change, What Change?
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Can Technology Improve Your Memory?

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Can Technology Improve Your Memory?
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

It’s Conyers’s Time to Act on Impeachment

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: It’s Conyers’s Time to Act on Impeachment
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Detention Camp Remains, but Not Its Rationale

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Detention Camp Remains, but Not Its Rationale
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

High Court: Gitmo Detainees Have Rights in Court

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: High Court: Gitmo Detainees Have Rights in Court
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Democracy in the EU Institutions

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Democracy in the EU Institutions
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Mobile Phone Number Moving Caused Feds to Wiretap Wrong American

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Mobile Phone Number Moving Caused Feds to Wiretap Wrong American
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Iraqi PM: Security deal with U.S. at ‘dead end’

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Iraqi PM: Security deal with U.S. at ‘dead end’
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Bush Pledges on Iraq Bases Pact Were a Ruse

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: Bush Pledges on Iraq Bases Pact Were a Ruse
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

A New Kind Of Corporate Slavery

Saturday, June 14th, 2008

Have Your Say: A New Kind Of Corporate Slavery
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Related News

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 14th, 2008 at 2:46 pm and is filed under Science & Technology News, Surveillance, Civil Liberties & Human Rights News . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Translate: