BREAKING: Discover How A Slacker Makes $100,000 A Year!

WEBMASTERS! Get Your Website To The Top Of Google

New World Order Evolving

Friday, June 29th, 2007

The term “*New World Order*” (*Novus Ordo Mundi*) has been used to refer to a new period of history evidencing a dramatic change in world political thought and the balance of power.

When we talk about New World Order we can say that everything is about hegemony and dominance of stronger countries over others. If we look back through history we can recount various attempts of several countries to create a New World Order or some sort of dominance among countries. Some of these attempts was led by great warriors such as, Alexander the Great (Macedonian Empire), Julius Caesar (Roman Empire), Genghis Khan (Mongol Empire), Napoleon Bonaparte (French Empire), Adolf Hitler, among others. From this we can see that every attempt to rule the world was needles and devastating.

We heard many theories and conspiracy theories about the New World Order, some of which include the USA and the UK wanting to form the Federal World Government, or the Illuminati (The People of The Light) believing that they are masterminds behind events that will lead to a New World Order, or that the Freemasons are involved in the conspiracy to create a New World Order, or that international organizations such as the World Bank, IMF, European Union, the United Nations, and NATO are often listed as core NWO organizations, Black helicopters, etc. In my opinion, these theories will never take place because of strong disagreement from Russia, China and Islamic countries.

In regard to the above, in present times, we can see that even more countries are trying to dominate and create some sort of order among themselves by creating Unions and Alliances between them; like European Union, African union, Alliance of the USA, the UK, Australia and Canada, etc.

In the very near future, in order to survive, keep national identity and to maintain economy, costume and culture it is more likely that more Unions and Alliances would be formed to create a New World Order; bigger European Union with new member states such as: Macedonia, Croatia and Turkey. Union of Asian and Eurasian countries Russia, Mongolia, China and India, Union of Islamic countries from Middle East and Central Asia, Iran, Iraq and Saudi Arabia, stronger unity of African Union, Union of Central and South America; Panama, Colombia, Cuba and Venezuela, and eventually North American Union; USA, Canada and Mexico. After these Unions, we can expect even bigger ones.

My vision is that they are going to look like this.

European Union (EU) led by supreme members Germany and Austria will expand to five more countries Switzerland, Norway, Serbia, Montenegro and Moldova.. It is most likely that the EU will have problems with France and Turkeybecause of the pressure from Muslim countries from the south.

In order to maintain stability in the world, Union of Asia and Eurasia countries (UA) led by Russia, China and India will expand to Ukraine, Georgia, Armenia, Nepal, Bhutan, Sri Lanka and North Korea. South Korea and Japan will try to stay neutral while on the other side Pakistan, Azerbaijan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan will try to form some sort of Union among themselves because of historic experience and influence from Russia and India. This Union will create struggle between Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and the UA but eventually will get them back to Russian and Indian embrace.

Because of enormous power of other Unions, Union of Islamic countries will transform it self in Union of Middle East and North Africa (MENA) and led by Iran and Saudi Arabia will enlarge to whole Middle East (except Cyprus and Israel), North Africa, Sudan and Afghanistan. In these circumstances,
Israelwill lose support from the USA and the UK. This Union will be one of strongest unions since it would be directed strictly by religion and desire to preserve their customs; also, it will become economically one of the strongest and one of the most influential Union since there is great number of Muslims in the EU and the USA. Turkey, France and Morocco will be the bridges of MENA to set influence on the EU.

The African Union will get weakened when it loses members from the North but eventually she will form new Sub-Saharan Union (SSU) which will become stronger, and finally place Africa on the right way. Because of the events in North Africa and new MENA Union, SSU will prosper with great economic support from the EU, the UA and Great American Union (GAU).

Union of Central and South America will enlarge to the whole continent and they will join North America to create Great American Union (GAU). The USA will have great influence on other members through Mexico. This Union will be led by the USA in the North and Brazil in the South. This Union will make the USA to concentrate on the American continent and eventually stop supporting the UK and Israel, which will lead to the UKdrawing closer to the EU and Europe; this would push the State of Israel to find a new way out and for the USA to become independent from the two of them.

Countries from Southeast Asia like Singapore, Thailand, Indonesia, Philippines, etc. will become oasis for peace and world’s largest tourist destinations. It is most likely that Japan and South Korea will join them.

The Formation of these Unions will bring many difficulties and misunderstandings; however, Unions will be formed with an objective; desire to compete, to dominate, to parry, to be biggest and some even to survive, regardless of differences in religion, nationality, color of skin, history, culture, among others.

Bigger Unions means bigger desires, desire to be first, to be biggest, to be strongest no matter what. These desires will create disorder among countries, and eventually will create war of the Nations, war that will destroy mankind and mark the beginning of a true world order.

Have Your Say: New World Order Evolving
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Brown: No Change to ID Card System

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Tom Espiner
RINF Alternative News

Gordon Brown will not substantially alter current government IT projects, analyst firm Ovum said on Thursday, the first full day of office for the new prime minister.

“We don’t see a huge change in direction,” said Ovum’s senior analyst John O’Brien. “As chancellor, Brown pretty much helped to direct all investments in the last 10 years anyway — they had his stamp of approval.”

Instead, Ovum expects a greater drive towards efficiency. “The nuances will shift,” said O’Brien. “The public sector will have to deliver services in a more effective way.”

As part of the Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR), which is expected to identify future investments and reforms in government spending, central government will have to deliver five percent year-on-year efficiency gains.

This will encourage greater information sharing between government departments, according to Ovum. “Closer collaboration and a shared agenda will take up costs by making systems more effective,” said O’Brien. “Shared help-desk services, greater automation and remote working will take up costs. Using thin clients is nothing new in the IT world, but it will be for government.”

Ovum said it expected Brown to implement no change in the NHS’s National Programme for IT, because it is starting to demonstrate some success. However, projects such as the National Identity Register, that will support the ID cards scheme, may be delayed.

“For the ID cards scheme, procurement will continue as is. However, they’re modifying the nuts and bolts about information sharing and access to prevent fraud — this may require more thought,” said O’Brien.

###

Biometric documents (ID cards and passports) will work fine for organisations where everyone concerned is on the database and every point of transaction has equipment to read these biometric documents.

Nationally it is virtually impossible to satisfy both these conditions and hence these biometric systems will fail by making bad problems worse. For example criminals will be tempted to use fakes of these documents where there is no equipment to read them. So rather than deterring this system will boost identity fraud which will be even more complex to solve.

This shows why these ID cards should not be implemented at any cost.

Have Your Say: Brown: No Change to ID Card System
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Police hunt for London car bomber

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Police are hunting the driver of an abandoned car containing a bomb that would have killed hundreds of people in central London had it exploded. An ambulance crew spotted the metallic green Mercedes by chance outside the busy Tiger Tiger night club in Haymarket at 0130BST (0030GMT).

Police defused a bomb made of 60 litres of petrol, gas cylinders and nails.

In what is believed to be a related incident Park Lane was cordoned off because of a suspicious vehicle.

The Haymarket and Park Lane areas remain closed as dozens of officers continue to make detailed forensic searches.

The Mercedes is being tested at the Forensics Explosives Laboratory in Kent. CCTV footage is also being examined.

Extra patrols

Assistant Commissioner Tarique Ghaffur urged people to be “alert and vigilant” and report anything suspicious to police.

Disruption would be kept to a minimum, he said, although the police were reviewing the safety of a number of big public events set to take place in the capital over the weekend.

“I want to reassure Londoners that we are doing everything possible to make them safe,” he added.

Following Friday’s discovery police patrols in central London were stepped up “to provide a visible reassurance”, rather than in response to a specific threat.

Officers were visiting licensed premises to reiterate crime prevention and safety advice, said a police spokesman.

Park Lane was closed at Marble Arch to Hyde Park Corner and a 200m cordon was in place.

Sources close to the investigation said the Park Lane closure was linked to the discovery of a vehicle at an underground car park. A police robot is being used to investigate the vehicle.

“International elements” are believed to be involved with the Haymarket bomb, Whitehall sources have told the BBC.

Police sources said the bomb would have caused “carnage” if it exploded.

Nightclubbers

Deputy Assistant Commissioner Peter Clarke, head of Scotland Yard’s counter-terrorism command, said: “It is obvious that if the device had detonated there could have been serious injury or loss of life.”

The ambulance had been called to the nightclub - where up to 1,700 people were inside - when they spotted what they thought was smoke, now believed to have been vapour released from the petrol.

Bomb experts manually disabled the “potentially viable explosive device”.

Scotland Yard declined to comment on reports a mobile phone was found in the Mercedes that may have been intended to trigger the explosion.

One report claimed a police officer disconnected the mobile phone before bomb squad officers arrived.

Mobile phones have been used to detonate bombs in Iraq and Indonesia and in other terror attacks, such as the 2004 Madrid bombings.

The car bomb has echoes of other terrorist plots. Five men were jailed for life in April for a UK bomb plot linked to al-Qaeda that targeted a shopping centre and a nightclub with a giant fertiliser bomb.

And Dhiren Barot was jailed for life last November for conspiring to park limousines packed with gas canisters underneath high-profile buildings before detonating them.

DAC Clarke told a press conference it was too early to say who was responsible but the incident “resonated” with previous terror plots.

Alert

Speaking in Downing Street after meeting Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the new Home Office minister for security, Admiral Sir Alan West, Home Secretary Jacqui Smith urged members of the public to report anything suspicious to the police.

Mr Brown said Britain faced “a serious and continuous threat” and the public “need to be alert” at all times.

The BBC’s Andy Tighe said the timing of the car bomb was significant coming a day after Mr Brown became prime minister, and with the second anniversary of the 7 July bombings approaching.

The current terror threat level has been classed severe - one level lower than the highest “critical” - since 14 August 2006.

Intelligence sources said they were keeping an open mind on who was responsible for the car bomb.

Police have urged anyone with information to phone the confidential Anti-Terrorist hotline number on 0800789321.

Map of area affected

BBC

Have Your Say: Police hunt for London car bomber
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Appeals Court Unseals CIA Leak Documents

Friday, June 29th, 2007

By MATT APUZZO

A federal appeals court said Friday it would release some of the documents it reviewed when deciding to force journalists to testify in the CIA leak investigation.

The ruling followed a request by The Associated Press and Dow Jones, which asked for the release of the sworn statements Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald gave to justify subpoenas for New York Times reporter Judith Miller and Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper in 2005.

Fitzgerald wanted the reporters’ help in his investigation of the leak of CIA operative Valerie Plame’s identity to syndicated columnist Robert Novak. The news organizations argued that Fitzgerald never needed the testimony of reporters because he knew the source of the leak all along.

Miller spent 85 days in jail in 2005 for refusing to testify. Cooper testified under a court order.

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit was not persuaded by the media’s argument but said some of the materials no longer needed to remain secret. Former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage, the original source for the newspaper article naming Plame, has publicly identified himself.

“One can safely assume that the ‘cat is out of the bag’ when a grand jury witness - in this case Armitage - discusses his role on the CBS Evening News,” the court said.

The court agreed to release portions of the court’s ruling authorizing the subpoenas and two affidavits discussing grand jury matters. Those matters, the court said, became public recently during trial of former White House aide I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby.

No one was charged with the leak. Libby was sentenced to 2 years in prison for obstructing the investigation.

Have Your Say: Appeals Court Unseals CIA Leak Documents
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Is Freedom of Speech Under Attack?

Friday, June 29th, 2007

By Mick Meaney
RINF Alternative News

An independent news web site has begun appealing for help from members of the public in a bid to get re-enlisted in Google News.

The web site, thepeoplesvoice.org has been accused of publishing anti-Semitic content and hate material due to their criticism of Israel.

The web site strongly denies the accusations.

Thepeoplesvoice.org said: “We post excellent articles by many different people and from journalists risking their lives to bring us the non-corporate truth about the Occupied Palestinian Territories. That is what we are about, giving people a voice on the net to speak out on environmental political and social justice issues.”

Apparently the web site has been pulled from Google’s news service because of complaints from users.

“Although Google News doesn’t proactively review articles or images for adult content, violence, or hate speech, we depend largely on user reports to identify articles containing these materials. We appreciate any feedback with regard to these types of content appearing in our News index,” said the Internet giant.

Whilst investigating the web site I could not find any example of hate or anti-Semitic content.

Independent media is our best hope of exposing and stopping the criminal cabal from enforcing a New World Order through illegal wars, fear tactics and 24/7 surveillance. Give alternative media your support. Contact Google News.

Have Your Say: Is Freedom of Speech Under Attack?
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Secret trials for terrorists, says US judge

Friday, June 29th, 2007

David Nason

A TOP-RANKING US judge has stunned a conference of Australian judges and barristers in Chicago by advocating secret trials for terrorists, more surveillance of Muslim populations across North America and an end to counter-terrorism efforts being “hog-tied” by the US constitution.

Judge Richard Posner, a supposedly liberal-leaning jurist regarded by many as a future US Supreme Court candidate, said traditional concepts of criminal justice were inadequate to deal with the terrorist threat and the US had “over-invested” in them.

His proposed “big brother” solutions flabbergasted delegates at the Australian Bar Association’s biennial conference, where David Hicks’s lawyer, Major Michael Mori, is to be awarded honorary life membership.

“We have to fight terrorism with our strengths, and our strengths evolve around technology, including the technology of surveillance,” said Justice Posner, a prolific legal scholar who sits on the US Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

“Are there terrorist plots that are at a formative stage among the large US Muslim community of two to three million people? In the 600,000 Canadian Muslim population, are there people planning attacks on the US?

“What we have to do is discover the extent of the terrorist threat to the US. There is a danger, and it demands a rethinking of some of our conventional views on the limits of national security measures.

“We should think of surveillance as preventative, not punitive. We should think of controls that have nothing to do with warrants or traditional criminal justice to prevent abuses.”

Judge Posner said the US temper and culture could not sustain repeated terrorist attacks.

Melbourne QC Tim Tobin said it was a shock to hear such hard and isolationist positions coming from a judge known as a liberal thinker. While he was disturbed by the judge’s proposed crackdown on US and Canadian Muslims, he suspected the sentiment would be welcomed by the Howard Government.

Judge Posner raised the prospect of secret trials as a “tailored regime” to prosecute terrorists in cases where there was a concern about classified information going public.

Queensland SC Glenn Martin said he had been “jolted” by the address: “I hope we never have secret trials in Australia.”

Judge Posner said the US was “a law-saturated society where even non-lawyers tend to think ofproblems in terms of legal categories”.

“Criminal justice and war are the two responses we have to terrorism. Each comes with its own legal institutions and doctrines and regimes but the struggle against international terrorism doesn’t fit either very well.”

He said it was “quite misplaced” to suggest national security measures in force or contemplated in the US could endanger liberty and undermine the political system. This was because governments could no longer conceal what they did: “We have a very aggressive media and a huge and complex government where many people in the government are quite willing to talk to the press.”

Have Your Say: Secret trials for terrorists, says US judge
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Google sued over defamatory postings found on web search

Friday, June 29th, 2007

By Robert Verkaik

Google, the world’s biggest search engine, is being sued by a London businessman in a landmark legal action that could hold the US-based company liable for the publication of inaccurate, malicious or damaging material on the internet.

The case, the first of its kind in this country that seeks to make search engines responsible for the content of the internet - could trigger severe restrictions on the free flow of information on the web.

Last night, internet experts warned that if the action was successful it would mean Google could be held liable for the content of 11.5 billion web pages.

The case is being brought by a 48-year-old man from Wembley who has instructed a City law firm to begin defamation proceedings after the search engine directed users to web pages that the businessman claims contained “deeply offensive and commercially damaging” material about his enterprises.

In one anonymous posting on an internet discussion forum, Brian Retkin, managing director of the internet company dotworlds, is wrongly accused of cashing in on the 11 September attacks on America by offering the free registration of domain names to the US in a way that took advantage of the fervent patriotism at the time. In other anonymous postings, he is wrongly and groundlessly accused of conducting fraudulent business.

The allegations are believed to have originated in America, where it is much more difficult to succeed in a libel claim.

US judges have ruled that search engines and other third party internet service and product providers are immune from defamation lawsuits. But in Britain, similar legal protection is conditional on the company not having notice of the complaint. And in Britain that area of the law is yet to be fully tested.

Mr Retkin, whose internet company is a domain name registrar (a company that allows customers to register domain names on the internet), says he has spent three years trying to persuade Google to permanently remove the libellous allegations from its search results.

In a letter sent to Google, Franklin Price, a litigation partner at the law firm Jeffery Green Russell, has given formal notice of the defamation action under the court’s pro-action protocol.

“There comes a point,” said Mr Retkin, “when someone must take responsibility for this material. These allegations were posted anonymously so there is no way of suing the author. Where it has appeared on internet discussion forums we have asked them to remove it but it keeps popping up again at other internet addresses. The only solution is for Google to remove it and give an undertaking they will remove it permanently.”

In legal correspondence between Mr Retkin and Google, a California-based company with sales and marketing offices in London, claims it has “blacklisted” the offending links and removed the material complained of by Mr Retkin. It also rejects the idea that it should be responsible for the contents of links produced in an internet search.

In an email written by Google’s legal counsel Harjinder Obhi, the company argues: “Google is not responsible for the content of any result of a query which may be presented to a user of Google’s web search service. Google has absolutely no connection, control or ability to direct or influence the content of web pages which may be shown as links within any given set of search results.”

Defamation on the internet

Internet publishers rightly fear the libel laws in this country, which are much stricter than those of other jurisdictions. They know the onus is on them to prove the truth of any statement found on their websites. Recent UK case law has established that a company based outside the jurisdiction may not be immune from litigation in this country if the material can be read by internet users in this country.

A successful defamation ruling against a search engine such as Google would have dramatic consequences for thousands of similar organisations or internet product providers which refine, channel and forward information. The reason that has not already happened is that the Defamation Act 1996 offers a defence to an internet product or service provider where it can claim it is unaware of defamatory or potentially defamatory material it is hosting or material arising from a search result. This protection is supported by the Electronic Commerce (EC) Directive, 2002. But the Defamation Act stipulates that once the company has been put on notice about a complaint it must take action to remove the material or block access.

Have Your Say: Google sued over defamatory postings found on web search
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Egyptian spy dies in UK

Friday, June 29th, 2007

Marwan is reported to have feared for his life after being accused of being a spy for Mossad [AFP]

An Egyptian billionaire who allegedly spied for Israel in the 1970s has been found dead outside his home in London.

Ashraf Marwan, the son-in-law of Gamal Abdel Nasser, a former Egyptian president, “lost his balance” while standing on his balcony on Wednesday and fell to his death, Egyptian state media said.

British police said only that they were looking into the death of an Egyptian man in central London, and it was being treated as “unexplained” but not suspicious.

“It’s understood he may have fallen from a balcony,” a police spokesman said.

A spokesman for Westminster Coroner’s Court said an inquest would open on Friday into a man named Ashraf Marwan, but did not give any further details.

‘Balance problems’

Egypt’s MENA news agency quoted a source close to the family as saying Marwan had recently suffered from balance problems because of an illness and had been using a cane.

Marwan had been living in London after leaving Egyptian government service late in the 1970s.

He is thought to have feared for his life after he was publicly accused of being a spy for Mossad three years ago.

Israeli media named his as a source for the Israeli secret service, saying he had passed a warning to Mossad, the Israeli intelligence agency, on the eve of the 1973 Middle East war, also called the Yom Kippur War.

Yom Kippur ‘tip-off’

Gad Shimron, a former Mossad officer turned historian, said Marwan had warned Israel hours before the Egyptian attack in 1973.

“We know now, from testimony given by Israeli spymasters and made public years after the Yom Kippur War, that Marwan was the man who tipped off the Mossad,” he said.

According to The Times, a UK newspaper, Marwan offered his services to Israel in 1969, going on to provide information on Egypt and the Arab world.

He worked as a senior information official for both Abdel Nasser and Anwar Sadat, Abdel Nasser’s successor as president.

Egyptian media has said he also had “intelligence duties”.

Agencies

Have Your Say: Egyptian spy dies in UK
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report in our forum .

Related News

This entry was posted on Friday, June 29th, 2007 at 7:09 pm and is filed under Contributions & Guests, New World Order, Opinion . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Translate: