4 Responses to “The World Health Organization Documents Failure of US Drug Policies”第4响应“世界卫生组织文件失效的美国毒品政策”

1. pingback: pingback ： Posted: Jul 8th, 2008 at 1:49 pm 发布时间： 2008年7月8日在下午1时49分

   USA: The World Health Organization Documents Failure of US Drug Policies - Marijuana.com美国：世界卫生组织文件失败的美国禁毒政策-M arijuana.com [...] US Drug Policies The World Health Organization Documents Failure of US Drug Policies 07-08-08|RINF.com|By Bruce Mirken The United States has some of the world’s most punitive drug policies and has led [...] [...]美国药物政策世界卫生组织的文件失效的美国药物政策07-08-08 | RINF.com |布鲁斯Mirken美国有一些世界上最惩罚性的禁毒政策，并导致[ 。 .. ] Reply回复 | Quote selected text报价选定的文本 | Link to this链接到本

2. pingback: pingback ： Posted: Jul 9th, 2008 at 2:20 am 发布时间： 2008年七月九日在上午02时20

   The World Health Organization Documents Failure of US Drug | 72off.net世界卫生组织的文件失败的美国药物| 72off.net [...] “The US, which has been driving much of the world’s drug research and drug policy agenda, stands out with higher levels of use of alcohol, cocaine, and cannabis, despite punitive illegal drug policies. [...] “美国一直推动对世界上许多国家的药物研究和药物政策议程，站在了更高层次的使用酒精，可卡因和大麻，尽管惩罚性的非法毒品的政策。 … The Netherlands, with a less criminally punitive approach to cannabis use than the US, has experienced lower levels of use, particularly among younger adults. ...荷兰，以较少的刑事责任的惩罚办法，使用大麻超过了美国，经历了较低级别的使用，尤其是年轻的成年人。 Clearly, by itself, a punitive policy towards possession and use accounts for limited variation in nation level rates of illegal drug use.”For this we arrest 830,000 Americans a year on marijuana charges?http://rinf.com/alt-news/culture/th…-policies/4050/ [...]显然，本身的惩罚性政策的占有和使用有限的账户变化率的国家一级的非法使用毒品。 “为此，我们逮捕830000美国人一年大麻费用？ http://rinf.com/alt-news/文化/次... -policies/4050 / [...] Reply回复 | Quote selected text报价选定的文本 | Link to this链接到本

3. Victor Hansens 维克多Hansens Posted: Jul 9th, 2008 at 3:55 pm 发布时间： 2008年七月九日在下午3时55分

   Trying to find a link between drug use and drug enforcement doesn’t make sense, said Tom Riley, spokesman for the US Office of National Drug Control Policy in Washington.试图找到一种之间的联系使用毒品和禁毒执法就没有意义了汤姆说，莱利，发言人办公室，美国国家毒品管制政策在华盛顿举行。 Why doesn’t it make sense??为何它没有道理？ ？ “The US has high crime rates but we spend a lot on law enforcement and prison,” Riley said yesterday in a telephone interview. “美国犯罪率高，但我们花费了大量的执法和监狱， ”莱利说昨天在接受电话采访。 “Should we spend less? “如果我们少花钱？ Yes we should spend less.是我们应该少花钱。 We’re just a different kind of country.我们只是一种不同类型的国家。 We have higher drug use rates, a higher crime rate, many things that go with a highly free and mobile society.”我们有更高的药物使用的利率，较高的犯罪率，很多事情是去同一个高度自由流动的社会。 “ What?什么？ Having a ‘free and mobile society’ has to have higher crime rates, higher drug use rates??拥有一个自由和移动社会'必须有较高的犯罪率，更高的药物使用利率？ ？ What would our ‘crime rate’ be if 800,000 arrests went away and millions of man hours of Law Enforcements time went to other activities.什么是我们的罪案率' ，如果800000逮捕走，数百万人小时的法执法时间去其他活动。 A ‘free and mobile society’ requires sensible policy about drugs and there use, starting with the “Classification” of drugs, and continuing with the educaion of what are ‘drugs’.一个自由和移动社会的需要明智的政策大约有毒品和使用，首先是“分类法”的药物，并继续与educaion什么是'毒品' 。 The ‘legal’ prescription drugs are the drug problem.在'法律'的处方药是毒品问题。 According to Phillip Emafo, International Narcotics Control Board President, ” The very high potency of some of the synthetic narcotic drugs available as prescription drugs presents, in fact, a higher overdose risk than the abuse of illicit drugs.”根据菲利普Emafo ，国际麻醉品管制局主席说： “非常高的潜能的一些合成麻醉药品可作为处方药介绍，事实上，较高的风险比过量滥用非法药物。 ” The article points out that while the number of young people abusing illicit drugs in the US has gone down the number of Americans abusing prescription drugs nearly doubled from 7.8 million in 1992 to more than 15.1 million in 2003.文章指出，而一些青少年滥用非法药物在美国已经下降了一些美国人滥用处方药几乎翻了一番，从780万美元在1992年超过1510万美元于2003年。 Those drugs kill people.这些药物杀死人。 And all you have to do is go to a Doctor and explain the ‘pain’ you are in because of (insert your story here) and they can prescribe just about anything you want, the insurance company pays for it, you can still keep your job even though it may be addictive.和所有您需要做的就是去一个医生和解释'痛'你是因为（插入你的故事在这里） ，他们可以明只是您想要的任何，保险公司支付的，你仍然可以保持您的工作即使它可能会上瘾。 The FDA is in a complete shambles, no wy they can do what they are supposed to and the difference is you are part of the drug companies not the ‘Drug Cartels’ that are destroying our youth.美国食品和药物管理局是在一个完整的烂摊子，没有怀俄明州，他们可以做他们所要的区别在于你是不是制药公司的'毒品卡特尔'摧毁我们的青年。 The economy of the world seems to be in a hurt, yet the advertising budget for legal drugs “hit a record $4.8 billion in 2006, up from $2.6 billion in 2002.” Health Care isn’t health care, its a legal drug dispensory.经济的世界似乎是一个伤害，但广告预算的法律毒品“达到创纪录的48亿美元在2006年，从26亿美元，在2002年。 ”保健不保健，其法律毒品dispensory 。 We have television ads that give us an ‘atta boy’ for knowing how many prescriptions we take and finding out that little pink pill has a name.我们的电视广告，给我们一个'阿塔男孩'的认识有多少，我们采取的处方，并找出粉红色的小药丸有一个名字。 According to an article published in the USA Today, Thursday, January 10, 2008, “About 3.1 million people in the USA ages 12 to 25 have used cough and cold medicine to get high, the government reported Wednesday”.根据刊登的一篇文章在美国的今天，星期四， 08年1月10日， “大约310万人在美国12岁至25日已用咳嗽和感冒药，以获得高，美国政府星期三” 。 If there are 300million in the US then that is 1% of the population and according to LEAP 1.2% of the population is addicted to these other illicit drugs, that is for all age groups not just the 12 to 25 year olds.如果有300million在美国，这是人口的1 ％ ，并根据利普1.2 ％的人口是沉迷于这些其他非法毒品，这是为所有年龄组的不只是12至25岁。 We have drug store clerks checking id’s to sell you cold medicine becasue its used to make ‘meth’.我们药店办事员检查身份证卖给你的感冒药，因为其用来制造'法' 。 My 27 year old nephew died when I was 54.我27岁的侄子去世的时候54 。 The autopsy proved it was from an overdose of pain killers, ‘legal’ prescription drugs are killing our young people.尸检证明这是一个过量的止痛药， '法律'的处方药是要扼杀我们的年轻人。 We need to ‘Change the Mind Set’, good drugs, bad drugs.我们需要'变化的心态，良好的药物，坏药。 It needs to be based on reality.这需要立足于现实。 I guess he is right after all, trying to find a link between drug use and drug enforcement, under the current system doesn’t make any sense……but it should.我猜他是正确的，毕竟试图找到之间的联系使用毒品和禁毒执法，在现行制度下没有任何意义... ...但应该。 I think he is missing the point??我认为他是错过了点？ ？ VV维维 Reply回复 | Quote selected text报价选定的文本 | Link to this链接到本

4. David Raynes 大卫Raynes Posted: Jul 9th, 2008 at 4:49 pm 发布时间： 2008年七月九日在下午4点49

   The US has strong anti-drug policies it also has the strongest and best funded drug legalization lobby groups in the world.美国具有较强的反毒品政策，它也有最强大和最资助毒品合法化游说团体在世界上。 Any connection?任何联系？ The Dutch sitaution is not a success, it has given the Netherlands a third world drug traficking, drug crime, drug warehousing and manufacturing problem with astonishing levels of criminality.荷兰sitaution不是一个成功的，它给了荷兰的第三个世界毒品traficking ，毒品犯罪，毒品仓库和生产的问题令人吃惊的犯罪水平。 It has managed to get to this point while being a small first world economy.它已设法弄到了这一点，同时是一个小头的世界经济。 we have a model for legal drugs in tobacco & alcohol, both hugely harmful.我们有一个模型的法律毒品在烟草及酒精，都非常有害的。 In societies where alcohol is less used because of religious or social taboo, there is much less harm.在社会里，酒是少使用，因为宗教或社会禁忌，有少得多的伤害。 Less use=less harm, very simple.少使用=少伤害，非常简单。 It applies to all drugs and use reinforcing substances, legal or ilegal.它适用于所有药品和使用加强物质，法律或ilegal 。 Reply回复 | Quote selected text报价选定的文本 | Link to this链接到本