Het Nieuws van de wereld | Forum | Brits Nieuws | Het Nieuws van de V.S. | Globaal Nieuws | Politiek Nieuws | Nieuws sc.i-technologie | Het Nieuws van de oorlog & van het Terrorisme | Het Nieuws van sporten | Multimedia | Vastgestelde Homepage

Vertaal:

Maandag, 29 December, 2008

Door NORM KENT

Hij plukte voor Ondervoorzitter één van de belangrijkste architecten van de Oorlog van de Drug.

Hij plukte voor Leider van Personeelsleden één van de belangrijkste tegenstanders van medische marihuana.

Hij spreekt over het plukken van voor de vlek van Czar van de Drug een conservatieve kandidaat die een congresleider het vechten drughervorming is geweest.

Hij heeft beloofd om een eind aan invallen op medische apotheken in Californië te maken, maar hij heeft niet gezegd hij ruim zal steunen Amendement hinchey-Rohrbacher welke staten de kwestie zou laten beslissen.

Hij heeft zich van eens het steunen van marihuanadecriminalization aan het publiceren van commentaren bewogen die hij niet kan te veel gebruiken? politiek kapitaal? op de kwestie.

Hij heeft nu voor Algemene Procureur een kandidaat benoemd die een lange geschiedenis van zich het verzetten van de hervormingen heeft van het drugbeleid en die voor het gerecht het verplichte minimum veroordelen en burgerlijke verbeuring heeft gesteund.

Allen St. Pierre, de Uitvoerende Directeur van NORML, somde het het best over M. op. Obama? s benoemingen tot zover: ? Tot dusver, niet zo Goed:? Zijn gedachte-veroorzakend artikel verschijnt op NORML.com website bij zijn blog.

Van het samenvatten waarom de selectie van Joe Biden als Ondervoorzitter veroorzaakt hem? spijsverterings tumult? aan het vinden Rahm Emanuel? s het antidrugbeleid in het afgelopen decennium, het artikel vangt een momentopname van wat routinepolitiek gebruikelijk voor de spelers spoedig om in macht te zijn was.

Wanneer het over onze 44ste Voorzitter komt, waren sommige van zijn posities inzake marihuana eens aanmoedigend. Maar als M. Obama is naar nationale limelight op weg geweest, is er een pas ontdekte frustratie voor hervormers. Het schijnt de Voorzitter om te zijn zich van de linkerzijde aan het midden beweegt. En aangezien Loudon Wainwright eens in een populair lied schreef, zijn de enige dingen u in het midden van de weg ziet dode stinkdieren en gele lijnen. Nog, word ik niet nog gealarmeerd. Het is te vroeg manier, en er zijn nog ruimte en reden voor optimisme.

Het beginnen van uw beleid in aanwezigheid van een nationale economische crisis thuis terwijl de Amerikaanse militairen in het buitenland bij oorlog zijn kan uw prioriteiten op andere kwesties buiten de behoefte aan onkruid concentreren. Wij hebben gezien wat aan Bill Clinton gebeurde toen hij, in zijn beleid, probeerde om de oorzaak van vrolijke rechten te vroeg vooruit te gaan door onderscheid tegen homosexuals in de militairen te verbieden. Hij begon een firestorm die waardevolle eerste maanden van zijn voorzitterschap opbrandde.

We do know this though, and it is a challenging start. Rather decisively, on the official administration website, at www.change.gov, the following statement appears: ?President-elect Obama is not in favor of the legalization of marijuana.

What can we then expect of Mr. Obama once he becomes President?

I think there are many encouraging things.

First, in his past he has acknowledged the broad failures of the drug war, declaring in 2004 that it was an ?utter failure? which needs to be rethought.

Second, as an African-American in an urban community, few people will be as sensitive as Mr. Obama to the exhaustive legal toll this drug war exacts on minority communities. The arrests come quicker, the prosecutions are more frequent, and the sentences are longer. Drug arrests have been tools to deny poor people driver?s licenses, scholarships and federal welfare benefits, causing innocuous conduct to endure catastrophic consequences for otherwise decent people.

Third, the President is ?with it?. His telling comments to a group of students when asked whether he ?inhaled? marijuana were ?Of course, I thought that was the whole purpose.?

Those remarks are a reflection of the candor and commitment of Mr. Obama to address the issue in a new light. He did not play a game of Clintonian holier-than-thou cover-up. With the same self-deprecating qualities that he shared with the nation when he called himself a ?mutt,? Mr. Obama implied in tone and substance that marijuana may not be as bad as we have been hearing from the government for too many decades.

Last week, the website Change.gov asked the public to provide them with a list of the top public policy questions facing America. Visitors to the site were then asked to vote on which questions should take priority for the incoming administration.

After receiving nearly 100,000 total votes on more than 10,000 separate public policy issues, the most widely voted on question for Obama is:

?Will you consider legalizing marijuana so that the government can regulate it, tax it, put age limits on it, and create millions of new jobs and create a billion dollar industry right here in the U.S.?

Maybe Rahm Emanuel has turned a corner as well. Rahm is politically smart if nothing else, so I hope that he?ll follow his boss? lead in the area of criminal justice reforms. Also, to his credit, after voting years against Hinchey-Rohrbacher Amendment in 2007, as member of Congress from Illinois, Rahm voted in favor of holding back federal funding from law enforcement (read DEA) to raid or harass medical marijuana cultivators and dispensaries.

I know I have been unsuccessful in getting my own liberal Congresswoman from South Florida, Debbie Wasserman-Schulz, to even support this effort. Maybe Mr. Emanuel will influence her and dozens of others. It will take leadership from the oval office. That can only happen when the people in office are looked upon as enlightened reformers rather than being weak on crime.

Politically, I know such polls as the one the administration inaugurated here are instrumental in turning mindsets. If we can show politicians that it is ?safe? to support drug reform, even popular, we can suddenly find them on our side. To their credit, outstanding philanthropists like Peter Lewis and George Soros have been national leaders in helping bring public opinion out of the closet. These are men whose voices may be heard by the new administration. And I am here for them too if they need me. My number is listed. So too is Barney Frank, the influential Massachusetts congressman who has long supported decriminalization legislation.

The truth is that people who support decriminalization have always been a silent majority afraid to speak out. But give them a secret ballot box, and in state after state, you see massive support for medical marijuana and a more enlightened approach to marijuana reform. Perhaps the President, in his own unique disarming way, can lead a new path. He has surrounded himself with educated leaders who also have been willing to speak candidly in favor of decriminalization including new Cabinet nominee Bill Richardson.

We do not need a new Drug Czar, either. This is America. Czars are for Russia. What we need is the appointment of an educator, a scientist, a doctor, a constitutional rights lawyer to pave the way to a new era of drug enlightenment.

At the last NORML Board of Directors meeting, one issue we raised was one many of us within the drug reform movement can support. It has been three decades since the Shafer Commission released its national study on marijuana, which Nixon immediately trashed. Perhaps a new Blue Ribbon Commission, with decades more research behind it, and years of medical marijuana evidence, can look into new recommendations for the 21st century.

On one hand, such a Presidential panel would buy time for the new administration to get settled in with more pressing priorities. But it would also give drug reformers a national platform to address so many issues that have been, forgive me, cultivated- since the Shafer Commission, from forfeiture laws to raids on dispensaries, from the THC content of marijuana to medicinal initiatives. It is time to look again at marijuana with a scholarly and clinical eye instead of with SWAT teams and law enforcement raids.

Correspondingly, it is also time for the national drug reform organizations to speak with a singular voice and work together for a common purpose. There needs to be a unity of purpose, and leaders from the Marijuana Policy Project, the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws, the Drug Policy Alliance, Students for a Sensible Drug Policy, and a host of other respected reform organizations, too many to mention here, should hold their own meeting to develop a common theme with a collective initiative. We need to work together to send a message that is enlightened and progressive, convincing legislators and the executive branch that we are responsible and right..

The drug reform movement needs to act in a way that President-elect Obama has asked all of us to move towards: not to be tied to the politics of the past and the way things have always been done, but to engage hope by broadening our constituency and reaching out to others. Within the drug reform movement, fratricide must come to an end. We must bury the hatchet on our own rivalries, and move forward with a common purpose. We defeat ourselves by ourselves when we do not.

Our cause is just, and our goals have always been righteous. We may have only ourselves to blame if we cannot achieve now what we have fought so long for. I would say our time is now, but I thought that in 1976 when the Attorney General of the United States, then Ramsey Clark, said we should see an end to unjust marijuana laws before the end of the decade. I think we are overdue. Together, let us do better than we have already done.

We have a President who is willing to listen, a Congress that is willing to learn, and a public that is salivating for a better solution.

Norm Kent is a criminal defense lawyer from Fort Lauderdale who serves on the Board of Directors for NORML www.norml.com He can be reached at Norm@normkent.com, and his law office website is www.normkent.com

Have Your Say: What Will Obama Do About Cannabis?
Please read our posting guidelines before posting.
Alternatively you can discuss this report here.

RSS TrackBack URL

Name (required)

Mail (will not be published) (required)

Website

Related News

• Obama on Weed
• The World Health Organization Documents Failure of U.S. Drug Policies
• America’s never-ending prohibition
• Medical marijuana act passes NJ panel
• Indicators Point to a Softening of America’s Marijuana Laws

This entry was posted on Monday, December 29th, 2008 at 6:46 pm and is filed under Contributions & Guests . You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

Loading ...

ADVERTISEMENTS

SITE MAPS

7/7 Activism News Afghanistan Alternative-Energy Art Barack Obama BBC Big-Brother Bilderberg Biometrics Bush CCTV Censorship CIA Climate-Change Cover-Up Cults Culture Database-State David-Hicks David-Ray-Griffin Debt Democrats Demos Drugs Education Entertainment Environmental News EU False-Flag FBI Fraud Free-Speech Freemasons G8 Global-News Global-News Globalization Guantanamo Health-News History ID-Cards Internet Iran Iraq Israel John McCain Law Marches Media News MI5 MI6 Microsoft Military MoD Money Music NASA Neocons New World Order NSA Oil Pakistan Podcast Police-State Political News Propaganda Reviews RFID RINF Rumsfeld Science Science & Technology News Secrecy Security Slavery Space Sports Spy Spying Stephen-Lendman Technology Terrorism Tony-Blair Torture TV UK-News UN USA- USA-News Video Voting war War & Terrorism News Warfare Web Development News White-House Wolfowitz World_News Yahoo
2003 - 2005 Archives | 2005 - 2007 Archives | 2007 - 2008 Archives | Current Archives | Past Version